Sentences with phrase «because of a preponderance of evidence»

Or should the researchers recommend immediate action because of a preponderance of evidence?

Not exact matches

So you would rather science ignore the preponderance of evidence in support of evolution, just because you don't like it?

The reason why some say that there is no god is because there isn't a single shred of evidence to support the existence of any god, and indeed a preponderance of evidence to show that the universe and this world were formed by very natural processes.

Take the money away from the public schools where children will be taught real science and that a «theory» is very close to a proven fact because it is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.

Many of the cases failed to move forward because Baylor had erroneously determined it lacked jurisdiction, if an incident occurred off campus, or because it determined through an incomplete or inaccurate investigation that there was not a preponderance of evidence.

A judge ruled the jury reached the verdict against the preponderance of evidence in the case because prosecutors strayed from the legal theory presented in the original indictment.

The point is that there is a preponderance of evidence that indicate a wide range of sources of risk that could become large more quickly or more slowly because the future will bring changes changes in estimates of likelihood, consequence, or both.

Trenberth seems to want to be saying that the preponderance of evidence is in favour of deleterious human influence («deleterious» must be implied, because if it weren't, where's the problem?).

Because the consensus view is based on the preponderance of scientific peer - reviewed evidence.

I changed my views on nuclear winter making it «nuclear autumn» in 1984, incurring the wrath of the peace movement — again because the preponderance of evidence shifted with study.

Under Illinois law, you have to prove your case by what's known as a preponderance of the evidence, or basically that it's more likely than not that you were harmed because of the defect.

That's because the burden of proof in a civil case is a preponderance of the evidence.