If large scale changes in the ocean ecology occur
because of acidification the model can not reasonably be expected to capture the effects.
Not exact matches
Today the vast majority
of the populace in industrialized nations suffers from problems caused by the stress
of acidosis,
because both modern lifestyle and diet promote
acidification of the body's internal environment.
Two Atlantic Ocean coral species — elkhorn and staghorn — are listed as «threatened» under the Endangered Species Act, and NOAA is considering whether an additional 82 coral species also warrant some level
of protection under the law
because of threats from warming water, ocean
acidification and pollution.
A crucial reason why the study
of freshwater
acidification has lagged until now is
because determining how atmospheric carbon affects these ecosystems requires complex modeling, and is much less clear than that occurring in oceans, according to study author Linda Weiss, an aquatic ecologist at Ruhr University Bochum in Germany.
It's their «broadly adaptable physiology» that will allow them «to outcompete more complicated animals for niches that become available
because of warming, or
acidification, or any number
of reasons.»
The waters probed during this study, known as the California Current, are a hot spot
of ocean
acidification because of coastal upwelling, which brings naturally acidic waters to the surface, where they are made even more acidic by greenhouse gas pollution.
But they conclude that marine organisms with skeletons made
of high - magnesium calcite may be especially susceptible to ocean
acidification because this form
of calcium carbonate dissolves more easily than others.
Ocean
acidification in particular, caused as the ocean absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, is a grave concern for stony corals,
because it makes it harder for the animals to passively precipitate skeletons made
of calcium carbonate, the same molecule found in antacids for heartburn and indigestion.
Marine biologist John Bruno
of the University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill calls current ocean
acidification data «trivial,
because you can't buy cheap little devices to monitor [in place].»
Ocean
acidification is also predicted to reduce microbial production
of nitrate from ammonium (Beman et al., 2011), which could have major consequences for oceanic primary production
because a significant fraction
of the nitrate used by phytoplankton is generated by nitrification at the ocean surface (Yool et al., 2007).
ref Specifically, reducing land - based sources
of pollution (nutrient runoff and sedimentation) has been identified as an important approach to address
acidification in coastal waters
because nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen and land - based carbon inputs can increase the acidity
of coastal and oceanic waters.
Geologists are interested
because ocean
acidification has been implicated as one
of the causes
of the mass extinctions and these events may present useful analogs to the present situation.
Protecting salt marshes is one way
of combating ocean
acidification because the grasses in these marshes can store carbon dioxide.
More information on the effects
of ocean
acidification is a major environmental priority
because of the threat it poses to certain processes, organisms and ecosystems.
In the Nature study you state that previous work has not determined the impact
of acidification on the ability
of individual species to calcify
because they measured net calcification (that is, gross calcification minus dissolution) thus failing to disentangle the relative contributions
of gross calcification (the amount
of carbonate deposited by an animal over time) and dissolution rates.
Since you state that a decrease in net calcification could result from a decrease in gross calcification, an increase in dissolution rates, or both, you distinguish between these responses and get to the conclusion that the impact
of ocean
acidification on a creature's net calcification may be largely controlled by the status
of its protective organic cover and that the net slowdown in skeletal growth under increased CO2 occurs not
because these organisms are unable to calcify, but rather
because their unprotected skeleton is dissolving faster.
In the North West US along the Pacific Coast the oyster industry has been having a hard time for the last two or three years, partly
because of ocean
acidification, which is related with the upwelling
of deep water.
It is one
of the most extreme things they could come up with
because they are not able to find the fingerprint
of the carbon dioxide warming
of the atmosphere so then they started to come up with this new scheme [ocean
acidification].
OVERFISHING • Stop the Problem
of Ocean
Acidification Global warming has been a hot topic in the ocean world, and it is because of ocean acidification, known as «the other global warming pr
Acidification Global warming has been a hot topic in the ocean world, and it is
because of ocean
acidification, known as «the other global warming pr
acidification, known as «the other global warming problem.»
Because we could not collect sufficient hindgut content to serve as a medium in which to perform in vitro testing
of the effect
of acidification on the growth
of the five primary hindgut bacteria, we used LB broth instead.
He states «
Acidification, coral bleaching, the loss
of biodiversity, with global warming and extreme changing weather patterns is causing alternating frequent typhoons and droughts where fisheries are collapsing and dead zones
because of lack
of oxygen are the virtual underwater deserts.»
Because of CO2, ocean become
acidification.
I think the inflation would be a consequence
of that fact that (except for some things), in so far as the efficient market hypothesis applies, we would be operating optimally now except for global warming and ocean
acidification; applying the tax pulls us away from that optimum, the economy will then not be as efficient (ignoring externalities); but we should want to do this
because the economy is now more efficient when including the externalities.
The pace
of the completely man - made CO2 increase (by now the CO2 concentration is higher than at any time in the past three million years) leads to a rapid
acidification of the world's oceans,
because it overcomes the buffer capacity
of the oceans.
This is, in itself, a very serious problem
because it leads to the
acidification of the oceans, since CO2 forms carbonic acid in water.
When you suggested in an reply to a comment
of mine in an older post that the planet was resilient and also mentioned the coral reefs, I thought it useless to reply in rebuttal,
because the science so clearly already showed that persistent high water temperatures and the increasing
acidification of ocean waters were highly likely to do away with coral reefs during our lifetime.
Ocean
acidification is toxic for various species, and hard to adapt to
because of rates
of change.
Coral reefs are under stress for several reasons, including warming
of the ocean, but especially
because of ocean
acidification, a direct effect
of added carbon dioxide.
The
acidification of oceans may well be the most insidious and pervasive threat to life in the oceans everywhere, simply
because so many different plants and animals that play key roles in ecosystems will likely be affected — coccolithophores, pteropods, corals, mollusks (clams, mussels, oysters, snails), echinoderms (urchins, seastars), arthropods (lobsters, crabs, shrimp), etc., etc..
To use «
acidification» is akin to give the Nobel Peace Prize to the Commander in Chief
of a nation fighting multiple wars only
because he's made a nice speech.
Obviously the above assumption
of harmlessness would not be accepted on the basis
of current science, both
because of climate change and ocean
acidification processes.
Because if not, «Laboratory experiments revealed that ocean
acidification has negative impacts on the fertilization, cleavage, larva, settlement and reproductive stages
of several marine calcifiers, including echinoderm, bivalve, coral and crustacean species.
The 2009 State
of the Climate Report
of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tells us that climate change is real
because of rising surface air temperatures since 1880 over land and the ocean, ocean
acidification, sea level rise, glaciers melting, rising specific humidity, ocean heat content increasing, sea ice retreating, glaciers diminishing, Northern Hemisphere snow cover decreasing, and so many other lines
of evidence.
The Environmental Protection Agency is investigating whether it can use the Clean Water Act to control greenhouse gas emissions
because of ocean
acidification.
• Stop the Problem
of Ocean
Acidification Global warming has been a hot topic in the ocean world, and it is because of ocean acidification, known as «the other global warming pr
Acidification Global warming has been a hot topic in the ocean world, and it is
because of ocean
acidification, known as «the other global warming pr
acidification, known as «the other global warming problem.»
Meanwhile, a U.N. report predicted $ 1 trillion in annual damage from ocean
acidification if carbon pollution is not curbed, and the Antarctic ice pack appears to have grown this year partly
because fresh water from melting glaciers has raised the freezing point
of the near - shore Southern Ocean.
I'm against Ocean
Acidification theory
because I've done loads and loads
of background reading... about the lack
of credible scientific evidence that it represents any kind
of problem... in the eyes
of all those undecideds who can't make up their mind whether they agree with me on climate science or whether I'm talking bollocks...»
The article also talks about
acidification of the oceans
because of the methane.
I'm starting with the step on ocean
acidification,
because we haven't had much dialogue on that topic and now have a few OA experts in the CCNF community, and
because losing a 1 / 3rd
of ocean species would be really really bad.
Ocean
acidification occurs when carbon dioxide dissolves out
of the atmosphere and into the ocean, where it chemically reacts and lowers the water's pH. The process is sometimes dubbed the «evil twin»
of climate change
because of the harmful effects it may have on marine ecosystems.
Under pressure from the Center, the National Marine Fisheries Service released a status review
of the 82 corals, finding that 56
of them are likely to go extinct before the end
of the century primarily
because of ocean warming, disease and ocean
acidification.
In addition, Alaska oyster farmers are now indirectly affected by ocean
acidification impacts farther south
because they rely on oyster spat (attached oyster larvae) from Puget Sound farmers who are now directly affected by the recent upwelling
of acidic waters along the Washington and Oregon coastline (Ch.
Here I'd like to reproduce in full the Idsos» latest review
of an ocean
acidification study,
because it clearly demonstrates the difference between facts and alarmist interpretations
of facts.
Organisms living in Polar Regions are uniquely vulnerable to the effects
of ocean
acidification because only very low concentrations
of calcium carbonate is dissolved in the water column.
Of far greater concern than corals in particular is the ocean food chain in general, because while acidification will probably result in more oceanic dead zones as the amount of CO2 goes up and the amount of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
Of far greater concern than corals in particular is the ocean food chain in general,
because while
acidification will probably result in more oceanic dead zones as the amount
of CO2 goes up and the amount of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
of CO2 goes up and the amount
of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority
of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals).
Because, if it ain't ocean
acidification that will kill
of marine life, then for sure it's got ta be the speculative oxygen starvation that does the job, donchaknow!
Efficiency is very important in the case
of fossil fuel power stations
because fossil fuels are a finite resource — once we use them they are gone — and when burned they produce carbon dioxide and other substances that kill people and cause climate change and ocean
acidification; so it is very important to get as much electricity as we possibly can per tonne
of fossil fuel.
Willis an acid - base titration is indeed neutralization
because sufficient acid is added to exactly neutralize the base, chemists term
acidification as the addition
of acid to a solution.
«'' On both a monthly and annual scale, even the most stable open ocean sites see pH changes many times larger than the annual rate
of acidification,» say the authors
of the study, adding that
because good instruments to measure ocean pH have only recently been deployed, «this variation has been under - appreciated.»
These are the same fools who convinced an aboriginal band in British Columbia, Canada (Pacific coastline) to spend half a million dollars to dump several tonnes
of iron filings into the deep ocean
because it would correct «ocean
acidification».