Sentences with phrase «because of dividend cuts»

P / E10 (actually, 100E10 / P) does better than the initial dividend yield because of dividend cuts, especially before the 1950s.

Not exact matches

I like to count them in into my evaluation as I am an active investor in the European market because I don't have to take care of exchange rates and at least they haven't cut the dividends for a long time.

«Dividend cuts would take more from poor people than rich people because rich people would pay less taxes if their dividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska AnDividend cuts would take more from poor people than rich people because rich people would pay less taxes if their dividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska Andividend was cut,» said Gunnar Knapp, a top economist on the region at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska Anchorage.

That assumption seems logical because the income shares are lower in the capital structure, are perpetual, and bear the risk of dividend cuts.

That's a 12 % cut to EAD's dividend, but because EAD's earlier dividend payout ($ 10.88, but now $ 9.57) only amounted to 1.39 % of my total dividend income, my exposure was very limited.

You also have to be wary of companies with high current yields because the market may be discounting slower dividend growth or worse, a potential dividend cut.

For example, a dividend stock's yield could be high simply because its share price has dropped sharply in anticipation of a dividend cut.

It's not from dividend cuts or from selling positions, it's because Coca Cola (KO) has a strange payout schedule of April, July, October and December.

I'm also leery of companies that pay more in dividends than they earn — particularly if this situation persists for a long time — because such firms often cut their dividends.

Be skeptical of the highest - yielding stocks because they're often at risk of a dividend cut.

Many companies are deeply committed to maintaining and increasing their dividends over the years, so management won't cut dividend payments unless it really needs to do so because of financial constraints or some other really important consideration.

Selling positions because of a potential dividend cut or an actual dividend cut so far has been the right move.

Finally, while BP has said it will pay for the clean - up and direct damages to those affected by the spill, the Obama Administration is going a step further and threatening to force BP to cut its dividend and «repay the salaries of any workers laid off because of the six - month moratorium on deepwater exploratory drilling imposed by the U.S. government after the spill.»

That would indicate the dividend was in jeopardy of being reduced or cut because the company would have to use other resources to pay the dividend.

Because it (100E10 / P) includes ten years of earnings, it protects us against the effects of surprise dividend cuts.

It has a reasonable management fee, has a high trailing dividend yield (which will inevitably come down because of all the dividend cuts in the sector), and has been around since 2001.

A company may cut or freeze its dividend not only during times of general economic stress, but also because of specific difficulties that impact only itself or its industry.

For example, a dividend paying stock's yield could be high simply because its share price has dropped sharply (because you use a company's share price to calculate yield) in anticipation of a dividend cut.

Funny fact, some readers of mine had warmed me that this was going to happen and a very good reader from BC suggested me to sell my Bell Aliant units because of the announcement made regarding the dividend cut.

This is because dividends come out of earnings and using a decade of earnings protects us from surprise dividend cuts.

If you broaden your horizons across the entire TSX and S&P 500 to include smaller companies, there are plenty of high yielding stocks that may not be good options, paying high dividends simply because they've gone down in value and haven't yet cut their dividends (think junior oil companies paying out more than they're earning).

The fundamental question to answer with any high dividend yield stock is whether the yield is high because it is trading at an attractive valuation with a substantial dividend payout ratio, or because the dividend is out of control and ready to get cut.

Also, my stocks pick methods are not 100 % perfect because some of the stocks I purchased didn't perform well as I expected and they cut their dividend.

And because it increases fuel efficiency, thus cutting down on fueling costs, Sabertec's CEO Bill O'Brien thinks Blade has the potential to convert even the non-environmentally minded — which means big dividends in terms of environmental benefits.