Sentences with phrase «because of doctrine»

Because of this doctrine, a defendant's insurer will be looking for any reason you are partially or fully to blame for an accident.

It was possible to sell your policy and get something, but because of the doctrine of insurable interest eventually that market was abolished.

It is because of this doctrine that certain Islamic countries objected to Article 18 of the 1948 International Declaration of Human Rights, which declares (among other things) that «everyone has the right... to change his religion or belief.»

It is because of this doctrine that Islamic countries make apostasy a crime.

There it seemed that the non-substantialist philosophy of Whitehead was particularly attractive to Buddhists, because of the doctrine of the no - self.

however, because of the doctrine of religious liberty, have always competed religiously but never politically, that is, over the rules governing competition.

«Strong churches are strong in the first instance because of doctrine,» he says.

This is not gruesome: as Addis and Arnold wrote in relation to relics in their Catholic Dictionary, because of the doctrine of the resurrection of the body «Christians have lost that horror of dead bodies which was characteristic of the heathen».

This is partly because I accept the view that even our natural theology is inevitably a Christian natural theology, in the sense suggested by John Cobb, and partly because some of the doctrines that should be placed under the more strictly Christian aspect, such as the problem of evil, are not as strictly limited to Christian theology as are some others, such as christology.

Not exact matches

«Those statements are definitely relevant, because there's a longstanding doctrine that there can be laws or executive orders that on their face don't discriminative on the basis of race or religion but that is their motive — and if that is their motive, they can be struck down,» Ilya Somin, a George Mason University law professor, told CNN on Tuesday.

While predatory pricing technically remains illegal, it is extremely difficult to win predatory pricing claims because courts now require proof that the alleged predator would be able to raise prices and recoup its losses.405 Revising predatory pricing doctrine to reflect the economics of platform markets, where firms can sink money for years given unlimited investor backing, would require abandoning the recoupment requirement in cases of below - cost pricing by dominant platforms.

Dawkins argues that while there appear to be plenty of individuals that would place themselves as «1» due to the strictness of religious doctrine against doubt, most atheists do not consider themselves «7» because atheism arises from a lack of evidence and evidence can always change a thinking person's mind.

9 It is in vain that they keep worshiping me, because they teach commands of men as doctrines.»

What Steve and I, and other converts to Lutheranism (the original «evangelicalism») share, is a time in life where our life became «free» because of proper Christian doctrine and we are imbued with this.

Simply because one of the most important Mormon doctrines is that of free agency.

The reason is because they believe that Christ's original church in both form and doctrine, unaltered in any way, was restored to the earth again after a long time of being gone through apostasy (or a falling away — 2 Thessalonians 2:1 - 3 KJV).

Cardinal Müller: Not even an ecumenical council can change the doctrine of the Church, because her Founder, Jesus Christ, entrusted the faithful preservation of his teachings and doctrine to the apostles and their successors.

Before this happens, there will be a «great falling away» from the faith because false science (evolution) along with false doctrines (esp dualism) will fall, thus leaving the truth — Christ and His coming Kingdom which is «not of this world».

If you believe that Christian doctrine is essentially an attempt to capture dimensions of human experience that defy precise expression in language because of personal and cultural limitations, then the truth about God, the human condition, salvation, and the like can never be adequately posited once and for all; on the contrary, the church must express ever and anew its experience of the divine as mediated through Jesus Christ.

You can continue to spew out your immoral doctrine until you die, that doesn't make it true, and that doesn't make you any more pious even though you really want to feel better than everyone else because of it.

Just because christians took the morals of the time and incorporated them into their doctrine, doesn't make them theirs.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

And those entries have not been published in later editions of the book — not as a «white - washing,» but simply because they're not «Mormon Doctrine.»

and while examining a candidate's religion is perfectly reasonable from the plane of the individual, the media overblowing controversial religious doctrine, often misinterpreting or misrepresenting, and attacking individuals solely because of their proclaimed religion, is simply negative, unproductive news.

Actually there is no official doctrine what exact shade of color His skin is because it doesn't matter.

There many people are black and LDS and are so because they have gained a deeper understanding of its doctrine.

The only reason mormonism accepted blacks in the 70s was simply because of a temple being built in Brazil, before discovering that many Brazilians were mixed with blacks which meant according to their doctrine they were unworthy to enter the temple.

Because of this, many have called you a representative of postmodern Christianity — postmodern in the sense that while holding to the traditional doctrines of Christianity, you embrace a view of God's love and grace that extends beyond the parameters evangelicals tend to establish about who is «in» and who is «out» in God's family.

So to have someone who can finally speak from experience and explain to me that most of them don't understand their own doctrine, but it's still not an excuse because it's a damaging and false doctrine that the Bible clearly contradicts — is incredibly helpful and healing to my soul.

Such a doctrine, however, seemed to presuppose a sufficient degree of clarity in many other areas, because talking about God involves everything else.

This is because the emergent «conversation» ¯ «movements» are passé and narrow - minded ¯ lacks the commentary and the narrative of traditional Christian doctrine.

Quite frankly, Satan (an interesting and appropriate nic), because of the above short list, a normal human being might find it difficult if not outright impossible to believe in the Jesus Doctrine.

So many people believe in so many different gods and in so many different doctrines and dogmas because there is no proof for any one of them.

But anyway, I myself struggle with the same question you asked about pastors who know and embrace the full implications of Calvinism, and I have to say I DO regard a pastor like that as one who teaches False Doctrine and who is dangerous because of it.

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

I can't really suggest anything because I don't know much about the situation in particular but I can say they must not fully understand the doctrine of forgiveness and their duty as parents.

Oh, one last thing: after I made it clear I didn't feel comfortable in that church anymore (and not just because of panic attacks, but because I also disagree with their doctrine) they dumped me.

The doctrine of the ascension may have been given bad press because of its popular meaning, which seems related to ideas like «ascending to the third floor,» and less often to «ascending to the place of power.»

As a sidebar here and for my earlier responses about unfair grouping of all believers with promoters of false doctrine, I should mention that Jesus warned us to strive to enter His Kingdom through the narrow gate, because the many who claim to serve Him and come to the wide and easy gate will be turned away.

Regarding the argument that we can't be «unborn» etc, I think we have to be very careful building doctrine upon analogies, because analogies can never give us the whole truth, they only illustrate an aspect of it.

For it is also Catholic doctrine that body and soul do not share the same genesis because matter and spirit are not one common order of existence.

If the requisite disjunctive synthesis can not be explained by appeal to the doctrine that God values all possible worlds, this is not so much because evaluation is logically dependent upon gradations of importance, but because (accepting Christian's explanation of the absence of such gradations in the primordial nature) the logic of the doctrine itself entails that God be inextricably involved in the formation of actual worlds as «circles of convergence,» i.e., in «the orderings effected by individuals in the course of nature.»

Because the doctrine of Creation thus subordinates the world to God, the later Altizer rejects it as a perversion of the incarnational affirmation of the world that is for him now the heart of faith.

When I first began to examine the doctrine of the Inspiration of Scripture, it was because I saw so much Bible - abuse in our churches and from our pulpits, that is, people, pastors, and even seminary professors using the Bible in ways that made me extremely uncomfortable.

But the Christian missionaries also did not like the book because it repudiated the doctrine of the Trinity and condemned the Christians for their rejection of the Prophet of Islam.

Let me suggest another: these heresies are finding a resurgence because too many Protestants misunderstand the Reformation doctrine of sola scriptura.

Paul Tillich (1954) comments on this doctrine as follows: «In spite of its theological weakness this remained the predominant doctrine of Western Christianity because of its psychological power» (p. 14).

The doctrine of reincarnation is interesting because it attempts to provide an answer not only to the question of human destiny but also of human origin.

Because the doctrine of Creation is thus an affirmation of the world, the early Altizer rejected it as a perversion of the apocalyptic negation of the world that was for him then the heart of faith.

Well obviously they didn't kill anyone because of atheist beliefs or doctrine, because atheists have neither.