«Scotland is a better place today
because of equal marriage and I want to take that positive message from our experiences here to Belfast and beyond.»
Not exact matches
To deny females
equal authority not
because of their character, their intimacy with Christ or their giftedness, but solely
because of gender — a fixed and unchangeable condition — creates communities, organizations, churches and
marriages that are inherently unjustbecause they deny a people group shared authority based on an unchangeable condition - gender.
Civil unions (providing most
of the same benefits as
marriage with a different name) are better,
because a «separate but
equal» institution is always constitutional.
What YOU propose is STILL marginalizing people, STILL denying them
equal civil rights under the 14th,
because you have some weird idea
of what «traditional»
marriage is.
ddeevviinn I know
of a number
of people who say that they can find no sensible reason for denying
equal marriage rights to gays, but they will
because the Bible declares it wrong.
And I feel it is the responsibility
of us gay people not to want to have «
marriage»
because we feel we need this to be
equal but to really imagine how a gay relationship can become a blessing not only to the partners but also to the greater society and define it as something new and leave
marriage as what it is — a holy union between a man and a woman.
I don't lambaste your posts to Bob even though much
of the time they're poorly written and espouse points
of view even I find are difficult to defend
because I am adamantly in favor
of gay
marriage and
equal rights.
A federal appeals court on May 31st ruled that the Defense
of Marriage Act is unconstitutional
because it denies
equal rights for legally married same - sex couples, making it likely that the Supreme Court will consider the politically divisive issue for the first time in its next term.
By giving up the solace
of an earthly spouse and the prospect
of birthing heirs, the celibate gestures with her very body to a future time when «they neither marry nor are given in
marriage...
because they are
equal to angels» (Luke 20:35, 36).
Maria Miller is being pursued by the press
because of her role in implementing press regulation and support
of equal marriage, her parliamentary aide has claimed.
My preferred option would be to keep the traditional definition
of the word «
marriage»
because of its place in our law and history, but make it clear that civil partnerships, though different, are totally
equal.
Loughton is an unlikely political partner
of Tatchell
because he voted against the second reading
of the
equal marriage bill.
What is the mindset
of the people who support
equal civil rights for homosexuals but disagree with Obergefell v. Hodges
because it redefines the word «
marriage», which they believe is a sacred thing...
However, it was fair to acknowledge that the wife had, notwithstanding the parties»
equal contributions in the home, made a greater financial contribution to the
marriage because of her inherited wealth.
His ex-wife, 44, who was a «housewife and mother» during the
marriage, successfully argued she was due nearly half their wealth
because of her «
equal contributions to the welfare
of the family».
The Supreme Court based its decision on the fact that prohibiting same - sex
marriages constitutes a violation
of the 14th amendment,
because rights were not granted to all US Citizens by
equal.
This damages the relationship
because when we give love to get something back and when we want the
marriage to be
equal: giving and getting, we are acting from a mentality
of fear, scarcity and lack.
Since June 2015,
marriage equality has been legal in every state across the U.S.. That's
because a Supreme Court ruling determined that
marriage is a guaranteed right that is protected under the U.S. Constitution and the
Equal Protection clause
of the 14th Amendment.