The cost of testing (and often re-testing
because of false positive test results) could possibly hinder the success of a spay and neuter program.
The risk of incurring an unnecessary biopsy
because of a false positive exam increased in this study, from 1 in 100 women with mammography to 4 in 100 women with mammography plus MBI.
They suggest most women in their 40s should not have routine mammograms because the tests may cause more harm than good
because of false positive results (follow - up testing proves negative for cancer).
Because of these false positives, a sequence of tests - as originally outlined by Alonso et al. (2004)- is employed, beginning with detailed revisions of the detection light - curves, and continuing for surviving candidates with follow - up observations, to either reject them from the list of planetary candidates or to verify their planetary nature.
Both are good ideas in abstract, and would be desirable if they worked with reliable consistency, but both annoy me more than they help
because of the false positives when they do something I don't want them to.
«What could happen is the whole enterprise at Target could come grinding to a halt
because of false positives or software on the system that FireEye thinks is malicious and is not,» Schumacher told the E-Commerce Times.
Not exact matches
There are a lot
of false positives, and parents are getting out
of bed terrified
because they get an alert.»
But
because issues ranging from delays in reporting to
false positives can sometimes occur, Wilkerson suggests asking the baby's pediatrician to confirm it came back and if there were any areas
of concern.
Because only about 16 in every 100,000 people end their own lives, a test with such a level
of accuracy will give many
false positive and
false negative results if used on the general population.
For criminal investigators, if the database contains 10 close calls that resemble the print from the crime scene, that's a significant complication,
because by definition at least 9
of those 10 are
false positives.
Because ovarian cancer is relatively rare, occurring in approximately one out
of every 2,500 women, a test with only 99 percent specificity would result in
false -
positive diagnoses for 25 women, leading to unnecessary and risky surgeries and procedures.
First, it provides a strong argument against the opinion that subgroup analyses
of randomised trials should be strongly discouraged
because they can lead to
false positive findings due to the multiple comparison problem.
Vexing to doctors, the great majority
of positive results are
false, not
because the tandem mass spec or the other assays have made errors but
because certain babies are «borderline normal.»
Whereas technically the potential threats detected by the system in the past were not
false positives — they did accurately pick up tiny, background amounts
of DNA from organisms naturally present in the environment — in effect, they were
false alarms
because they signaled the potential occurrence
of a terrorist attack when none had occurred.
In addition to the huge hit to your wallet, there's also the potential harm
of false positives, and just
because a test has traditionally been done for a condition doesn't mean it's the best way to treat it.
The high - amplitude region
of depths over 5 % is not covered by candidates in the follow - up program,
because the eclipse depth as such identifies these cases as
false positives in planet finding, excluding them automatically from follow - up observations.
Because Huang's technique has been shown, via an analysis
of the very large dataset, to be both more sensitive — able to detect abnormality — as well as more specific (fewer
false positives), it could be used to improve cervical cancer screening in developed countries like the U.S.
It is clear, however, that evidence
of an excess
of amino acid substitutions (at least from site - by - site tests) is no longer a sufficiently convincing demonstration
of selection, not only
because a high ratio could result from selection on synonymous mutations rather than
positive selection on proteins [5], but also
because there is potentially a high
false discovery rate
of selected sites [6].
Because we tested a large number
of associations,
false -
positive relations are a possibility.
In my experience those interactions are much more superficial and shallow, simply
because you have only a few minutes together and
because you're face - to - face physical attraction becomes even more
of an anchor, That causes a lot
of false positives (easily rationalized away until the third
of fourth date when you realize that you can't actually tolerate the person).
Because the number
of potential factors is practically unlimited, and stock price changes are largely random, hundreds
of false positives are inevitable.
The only reason why this is mentioned here is
because although almost all dogs that test
positive for EPI do indeed have EPI — there have been extremely rare cases
of a
false read.
Because the magnitude
of the counter acting effects depends on the degree
of non-linearity, the rms
of the residuals to a linear fit, the length
of the trend and the temporal auto - correlation
of the «weather noise», it is difficult to generalize whether the method will generally result in too many
false positives or negatives.
I think that's mainly
because of my penchant for avoiding
false negatives (r / t scientists» need to avoid
false positives to protect their reputations).
Obviously
false because, firstly, with five established temperature records, claiming a negative trend with two
of them show a
positive trend is begging the question as to which record is superior.
100 %
false positive is quite interesting to note
because most studies citing shortcomings
of fingerprint authentication point to true negatives where the genuine customers are rejected by the reader if their fingers are sweaty, have a cut, or for other trivial reasons.
3 studies that assessed screening showed limited ability to predict future maltreatment
because of high
false positive results.
Many
of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one
of the following ways: (a) lack
of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility
of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack
of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high
false positive and
false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases»
of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack
of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies
of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion
of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies
of children with pediatric physical conditions
because physical symptoms may be a feature
of the condition rather than an indicator
of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures
of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure
of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).
The accuracy
of retrospectively self - reported childhood trauma might be limited by errors in recall
because of possible inaccessibility
of traumatic life events [63 — 65] or intentionally
false positive or negative responding.
After so long
of negatives it was finally
positive, the second line was faint, so we were hesitant to celebrate
because what if it was a
false -LSB-...]