Sentences with phrase «because of its live animal»

Perception proves to be particularly important for a retailer like Pet Express because of its live animal offerings.

Not exact matches

To know that 200 - something families have a different life because of these animals is really rewarding.»

He observes, however, that «the modernist desire in Frost and Eliot — to preserve an independent selfhood against the coercions of the market, a self made secure by the creation of a unique style — is subverted by the market, not because they wrote according to popular formulas, but because they give us their poems as delicious experiences of voyeurism, illusions of direct access to the life and thought of the famous writer, with the poet inside the poem like a rare animal in a zoo.

The reason why Christians don't believe in evolution is because they believe god created every animal for a purpose, as can be demonstrated by the delicate balance and hierarchy of life.

Of course the sequencing is not quite right, because the poem was written / inspired (take your pick) before science did its work.But the intuitive observer could see a clear evolution form plants to animals to human life, with continuities and differentiations.

Most people deny the sacredness of animal life not out of pride but because it is too painful to acknowledge.

Outside the rarified environs of the high academy and the fever swamps of animal rights advocacy, most people in the West believe that the lives of all human beings — not just the «normal» ones — are worth more than animals», simply because they are human.

«But there's spirituality because we human beings, and we animals, and maybe even we plants, but certainly the ocean and the moon and the stars, we all live with something that is cherished and we feel the treasure of it.»

The purpose of the sacrifice was that when you participate in slaughtering an animal, you commit yourself to try and sin-less because you don't want to take another creature's life.

He is a creature who, like all others, is mortal but who is unique because he knows that he is mortal; man is the animal who is aware of death and therefore is able to «prepare» for it by living in terms which allow for a recognition of mortality.

the existence isnt any different because no one here can prove what happens when you die, no one, so i suggest you make the best of your time in this planet that has the perfect balance of oxygen for you to breath and be thankful to whatever happened in this planet that made so many animals and plants and nature coexist and allowed us to have a place to live... well sorry to those who were killed by religious agendas... Do you know that someone tried to shut me up once by saying, oh then how can we be so perfect in form, we cant be evolving because how come we do nt evolve today..

For instance, a fellow who says there is no order in nature — nothing like laws of nature — that's not good common sense, because every living animal wants to make expectations about the future on the grounds that there are legitimate expectations about it.

Animal rights activists believe that animals deserve rights comparable to those of humans, e.g. life, self - determination, etc. because they too are sentient beings.

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

I have quoted Calvin's Institutes: «God [exalted] man above all the other animals to separate him from the common number, because he has attained to no vulgar life, but a life connected with the light of intelligence and reason --[this] at the same time shows how he was made in the image of God.»

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

-- commonly prove fruitless because someone proposes, in effect, that we try to consider the life of an animal as though it were one of Whitehead's occasions, with a single subjective aim determining the whole course of its life.

He develops his argument against atypically atheistic Darwinism around the fact of evolutionary convergence: «The central point is that because organisms arrive repeatedly at the same biological solution... this provides not only a degree of predictability, but more intriguingly points to a deeper structure to life...» His viewpoint is quite clear: «Metric - sized animals that are the end - result of many billions of years of prior stellar and biological evolution may be the only way to allow at least one species to begin its encounter with God.

It makes me feel that the term «vegan» is extremely unfortunate and misleading, because the term does not emphasize or even signify respect for animals or living beings or creatures, as it would benefit from doing, but rather uses a derivative form of «vegetable» or «vegetarian», which makes it sound as if the central point is — eating vegetation, i.e. plants, which makes it sound like a diet.

Just the thought that more animals lives have been saved because of your food choices warms my heart, and I take my hat off to you.

I've been putting off posting this recipe for apple pie for weeks because I could not for the life of me figure out how I was going to squeeze into one blog post exactly how much a celebration of imperialism and genocide over a feast of dead animals makes my heart hurt.

Interestingly, with greater awareness of animal welfare issues, kangaroo meat is the meat of choice for some people who prefer not to eat meat from traditional livestock, including chicken, because of the way many of them are housed during life (feed - lots or other high - density farming) and transported, handled and slaughtered.

Because of you, fewer animals are subjected to the horrors of live export today.

Nonetheless, live sales of cattle and sheep are a small slice of Australian meat exports, in part because it is easier to slaughter animals in Australia rather than ship them alive to Asia and the Middle East.

But we could not watch on as a vicious political assault was unleashed simply because Coles is supporting a campaign to improve the lives of animals.

For a start ending all live animal exports will not destroy our relationship with Indonesia, because our ties with that country are stronger than critics give them credit for and are certainly strong enough to survive our decision to stop selling it just one form of one particular foodstuff.

Mr Speaker the economic argument is in fact strongly in favour of banning live animal exports because of the way the trade is cannibalising the processed meat industry at the expense of thousands of Australian jobs.

The religious dimension of this matter has also been mischievously overcooked by the live animal export industry, because the fact is that the overwhelming number of relatively affluent Muslims who tend to consume Australian meat would have no objection to buying that meat so long as it's been processed in an Australian Halal certified abattoir.

This isn't Canada or France, and there is a moral taboo against that sort of thing here because horses are considered a different kind of animal — more intelligent, more beloved, worthy of living out their lives as working animals or pets.

Sometimes with farm life you have to make hard decisions... like putting down an animal because the quality of life is no longer good.

Sorry, I can't offer that kind of help and I will never be quiet as long as there are people out there that believe a living breathing animal is worth little because it is not human.

So all those whimsical pictures completely ignore the large number of animal infant deaths... Anyone, actually involved in rural life, especially in livestock management, is fully aware of this, not least because they often have to intervene to improve the survival rates of these already developed mammalian offspring.

There are several «pages» and the child will have lots of fun learning about the animals, their names, where they live, and because all of the animals are loose, the book is very tactile, allowing the baby to place the animals in the right homes.

But it could not be less folly to abolish liberty, which is essential to political life, because it nourishes faction, than it would be to wish the annihilation of air, which is essential to animal life, because it imparts to fire its destructive agency.

I challenged David Cameron to stop the badger cull not only due to rising costs, animal welfare concerns and public anger, but also because of widespread criminal activity, which threatens the future of a species which is protected by law and has lived on this land for 300,000 years.

«There have been reports of overcrowding, animals living in their own waste and, quite frankly, otherwise healthy animals being put down because they are given a strategy as to how we deal with animal control.»

He doesn't want to be dogmatic, because the Bible doesn't explicitly say there aren't extraterrestrials... but it does say we supposedly have dominion over all the plants and animals... Genesis 1:26 would have to be dealt with, of course, if there were aliens... though perhaps not if the life - form were merely a form of moss or lichen... and there's no scriptural barrier to God's having designed a planet populated entirely by spatulas...

Lots of animals differ in the parts of the color spectrum that they see best because of how they are tuned to their environments — whether they live in the deep sea or in caves, whether they mostly go out in the day or at night, or whether they're trying to pick up ultraviolet patterns on flowers or on prey.

This unique organization of tubulin is preserved among all living plant and animal cells, because it is essential for way in which microtubules assemble, Al - Bassam said.

But its importance in the more immediate regulation of sleep, like when a bright light wakes someone up, remained debatable because the experiments needed to show its role in a living animal were essentially impossible.

He was the first to seriously question Aristotelian ideas that plants don't have the stuff of life that animates us and other animals, simply because they...

The brightly colored animals came to scientific attention only because they were living as pets in small riverbank settlements — suggesting that the number of undiscovered species in the Amazon basin is even greater than scientists suspect.

The most likely explanation is that kiwis do not need vision because of where and how they live: they are active at night, and their habitat offers plenty of food and no predators, apart from introduced animals such as stoats.

Teeth tell such tales because their shapes and the usage patterns etched on them offer up heaping helpings of information about what animals ate and how they lived.

There are no quick answers, because you go according to the life of the animal, not your life.

«Captive studies may undercut these animals, may underestimate what they are doing,» because studies of animals in captivity can fail to fully replicate the social groups and relationships that occur in the wild, he told Live Science.

It especially doesn't look like an animal that would have lived in Australia, because the jaw and teeth show features of animals that nourish their young inside the mother's uterus.

(Ill - fitting because humans have been indirectly, and much less precisely, modifying plant and animal genomes for thousands of years via selective breeding, and evolution has been doing it for as long as there has been life on Earth.)

And a very ancient origin of symmetry makes sense: Because all but the most primitive animals are bilateral at some stage in their life, Bottjer says, «this basic feature must have been an early evolutionary innovation.»

As the drill approaches the crater, 800 meters down, scientists expect to find fewer species of the shell - producing animals that make up the limestone, because life was just recovering from the impact.