My dad worked for 35 years at Stelco in Hamilton, before watching a once great company dragged into bankruptcy, in large part
because of a pension plan it could no longer fund.
Not exact matches
Smaller businesses tend to eschew
pension plans because of the costs, responsibilities and administrative hassles associated with offering them.
These families are well respected and praised
because of the large number
of jobs that their companies offer to people, giving them stable salaries and security in
pension plans.
In short,
because they pool longevity risk, can offer a well - diversified portfolio with longer - term investments, and are professionally managed, public
pension funds deliver the same level
of benefits as DC
plans at only 46 percent
of the cost.15 Any funds invested with the state
pension fund would be kept in a separate investment pool from public sector funds.
Saunders, the president
of the Vancouver and District Labour Council, says that Canadian workers and their
pensions are more exposed to risk during market trouble
because of the successful campaign over the past decades to move from defined benefit
pensions, which guarantee a certain monthly amount when you retire, to defined contribution
plans, promoted by market enthusiasts.
«Go through paperwork
of old jobs
because you may have started a 401k or have a
pension plan that you are not aware
of,» Janis said.
Annuity experts say that Americans in retirement need the protection and income that annuities afford partly
because of fast - disappearing private
pensions and the
planned elimination next year
of some Social Security claiming strategies that can be used to boost retirees» monthly checks.
But there are other Canadians,
because of lack
of an employer
pension plan,
because they don't contribute to RRSPs or they don't contribute to tax - free savings accounts, aren't saving enough.
Worst
of all is the
pension plan for MPs — both
because its exceptionally lavish benefits are totally unfunded, and
because it's the scheme for elected representatives who need to lead national reforms.
The CFIB, in other words, represents a number
of shops whose employees are paid substandard wages with no in - house
pension plans, and who can get away with it
because the taxpayer is topping up the low CPP / QPP payouts their employees receive on retirement.
Their returns are shown gross
of fees, so that's something to consider as well, but they only charge 0.25 % to the
pension plan because they're such a large client (another aspect
of their approach I have great deal
of respect for).
In a recent USA Today article Chris Blunt, president
of the Investments Group at New York Life, when discussing the unpopularity
of 401 (k) s said «Americans never wanted to go to 401 (k)
plans, but they went there
because companies couldn't afford to offer
pensions anymore.
For 2011 and 2012, that meant losses, largely
because interest rates were falling — that increased the current value
of pension obligations, which affected the
plans» expenses.
Communities across Illinois are being forced to cut local services and raise taxes to afford their
pension payments, putting residents who rely on local government services at risk
because of the inherent failures
of defined - benefit
plans.
As Tory election strategist he is keen to make political ground over Labour's inclusion
of the
pension in the welfare cut,
because it allows the party to highlight how the opposition
plans to cut the basic state
pension in real terms.
On Wednesday, the unions will attempt to bring the country to its knees
because of the Coalition's
plan to reform the public sector's unsustainable
pension system.
That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill
because it fails to address the reasons why the cost
of benefits is exceeding the Government's
plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent
of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive
plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age
of 25 out
of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on
pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate
of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut
of over # 100,000 a year.
It was powerful
because it contained a specific policy idea (capping
pension tax relief for the rich) with a vivid critique
of the government's
plans (the ladder analogy).
Fact is the differences between Scottish and English
pensions is the tip
of the Ceberg
because on theses projections
Pension costs are set to triple and independent or not neither Scotland or the UK have a
plan to deal with that.
«I believe the real devil here is in your assumptions,
because the
plan's true costs are as yet unknown and depend heavily on the performance
of the State's
pension fund.»
A slew
of council members who originally supported the bill backed by the unions and introduced by Councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley today changed their votes to back the mayor's
plan — they said
because of a change that will provide the most seriously wounded workers, who qualify for Social Security disability, with a
pension equal to 75 percent
of their salary.
Details are in the article but here is a key finding:
because they earn more, school principals can expect to contribute 14 percent more to the
pension plan than a senior teacher would contribute over the course
of a career.
Current teacher
pension plans back - load benefits to the last 5 to 10 years
of service, mainly
because benefit formulas are based on final average salary calculations that do not adjust for inflation.
Most public school teachers participate in defined benefit (DB)
pension plans, which
because of different accounting rules contribute significantly less today for each dollar
of future retirement benefits than private - sector DB
pensions or defined contribution (DC)
pension plans.
In today's low - return environment, the
pension promises being made to state and local employees in general, and public school teachers in particular, have become very expensive and difficult to maintain largely
because the largesse
of the
pension plans assumes long run returns on the order
of 7.5 percent (or higher).
Governor Bruce Rauner's recent
pension bill would allow Chicago and other municipalities to file for bankruptcy, a mechanism which would allow the city to start over, restructure its past debt, and reform its
pensions plans (but even in this case, there would be obstacles around when Chicago could actually file
because of the way the city reports its debt).
Don't take time off or leave the profession for any reason,
because any lost years won't count toward your
pension plan's «years
of service» calculation.
Two,
because 90 percent
of teachers are enrolled in defined benefit
pension plans that push out veteran teachers, these demographic trends have widened the gap in retirement ages.
Reporters should steer away from reporting the simple «average» teacher
pension plan,
because the average hides a lot
of nuance.
Charter school teachers are some
of the biggest losers under current
pension plans,
because very few charter school teachers have worked long enough to qualify for the back - end benefits offered by traditional
pension plans.
Furthermore, teachers who remain in the field
of education but enter another
pension plan (such as in another state) will find it difficult to purchase the time equivalent to their prior employment in the new system
because they are not entitled to any employer contribution.
The District does not face
pension cost pressures, primarily
because most
of its employees are not in traditional
pension plans.
But those are not
because of the change in
pension plans.
Because of the tax treatment
of these securities, tax - advantaged purchasers, such as qualified
pension funds and tax deferred retirement accounts, including 40l (k)
plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs), may view an investment in inflation - protected securities as appropriate.
Still, some people are hesitant to opt into any type
of workplace program simply
because they don't trust their employer or the
pension plan itself.
«In fact, there may be diseconomies
of scale for larger public
pension plans because of the complexity
of implementing their investment strategies, which include contracting out for external experts — a practice that has become increasingly popular, with
plans investing more in non-traditional assets such as real estate, infrastructure, and private equity,» said the report.
There hasn't been a huge outcry about the loss
of the
pension plan, but that's largely
because younger Canadians have no idea what they're losing.
In case
of a
pension plan, it is possible to transfer a
pension to another country, but there are costs and paperwork involved (advisers love to do
pension transfers,
because the fees are very attractive - to them).
Then it's time to change your retirement
plan to maximize your eligible
pension income,
because that's pretty much the only type
of income you can split.
Unlike when I wrote about an actual observable and investable trend
of investing on the 1st day
of the month (there was a very pronounced positive alpha play here before the mainstream media caught wind
of it primarily
because of 1st
of month fund flows from 401 (k) s,
pension plans, etc.), there is nothing here for Tuesdays I'm sad to say.
This is
because you are in control
of your own destiny, and not hoping that the government, an employer
pension plan or a mutual fund manager would support you.
Because of its global presence, the company also has a global population
of pension plan participants, which...
If you're a teacher enrolled in a
pension plan, do not rely on that to be your sole source
of retirement income, especially if you are young,
because the funding might not exist by the time you get to retirement.
The DB
pension plan also does much better
because of the pooled longevity risk.
Meanwhile, that confident minority
of 25 per cent «are in a position where they have
pensions or a group
plan where they have an incentive to save
because their employers help them,» Bezaire said in a phone interview.
Part
of that was due to stupid tax law that the government put in
because they didn't want
pension plans to shelter income from taxes for
plan sponsors.
Registered
pension plans (RPPs) 1 are an important consideration in this regard, both
because they are a central component
of Canada's retirement income system and
because pension coverage and
pension characteristics have undergone changes in recent years.
Finally, regarding his feeling
of security with his Defined Benefit
Pension Plan (DBPP), DeGoey has this to say: «If Trevor feels as secure as he says he is
because of his solid Defined Benefit
Pension Plan (DBPP), then why is he investing so conservatively, aiming only to replicate purchasing power?
It says that is
because they will receive enough from the Canada
Pension Plan and other government programs to maintain their standard
of living.
Lately, it's been getting a bit
of interest
because some parties see it as a threat to much - loved Defined Benefit (DB)
pension plans for federal government workers and Crown Corporation employees, (such as Canada Post, CBC, Via Rail, etc.).