Sentences with phrase «because of our economic growth»

«There is good momentum in our industry because of demographics and because of the economic growth of China and the worldwide economy,» chief executive Axel Dumas told journalists.

Not exact matches

Mnuchin has argued that because of larger economic investment from businesses, growth from the plan would increase tax revenue despite lower rates.

The Trump administration argues that such maneuvers aren't a high priority, because economic growth will solve a lot of the problem.

Economists and reporters will seize on non-energy exports because those are what the Bank of Canada is counting on to revive economic growth.

One of the reasons the IMF has changed its tune on fiscal policy is because research it has done in the past year shows that borrowing to pay for infrastructure pays for itself over the longer term by generating faster economic growth.

This bill has a real chance of finally passing because of its potential for job creation and economic growth.

«There's no reason to think that the pace of economic growth today is excessive and needs to be slowed because of incipient inflation,» Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, said in calling on the Fed not economic growth today is excessive and needs to be slowed because of incipient inflation,» Josh Bivens, research director at the Economic Policy Institute, said in calling on the Fed not Economic Policy Institute, said in calling on the Fed not to hike.

WASHINGTON — Because of substantial wage growth, bonuses, and other positive economic factors, the Republican tax law is gaining in popularity with the American public after initially negative reviews, which is becoming a problem for Democrats looking to run on a cohesive economic message in 2018.

Investors have been buying equities because of strong economic data and earnings growth, according to Phipps, who pointed out they have been mostly ignoring political turmoil, including the specter of nuclear war between the United States and North Korea and the investigation of potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia.

That's still rapid growth — far better than any developed nation — but because it's such an integral part of the world's importing and exporting ecosystem, even the slightest economic pullback will have some eff ect on the rest of the world.

He said the difference might be because new infrastructure added during times of economic growth - new homes, roads or factories - is still used during recession.

«The argument is the types of things we're doing now with information technology just don't show up in GDP because a lot of what we do on the Internet is free,» or very nearly so, says Philip Cross, a former chief of economic analysis at Statistics Canada who wrote a paper on the slow - growth economy for the Fraser Institute think tank last year.

Because consumers are such a crucial driver of GDP, governments the world over have spent the last several years trying to coax consumers to open their wallets to fuel economic growth.

Canada has posted some of its weakest economic growth outside of a recession over the past couple of years in part because business investment sunk along with the price of oil.

Those numbers are similar to what we've seen most of 2012, but in addition the Scorecard survey also found that 80 % of small business owners are now concerned about an economic slowdown because of turmoil in Europe and slow growth in the U.S.

Curve inversions are worrisome because of their potential to constrain lending, which in turn curtails economic growth.

The trend worries economists because new businesses play a vital role in creating jobs, improving productivity and spurring economic growth; some researchers believe the decline in entrepreneurship, and in other measures of economic dynamism such as labor mobility, could be part of the reason the U.S. has experienced such a slow bounceback from the past two recessions.

Given these positive surprises, and because monetary policy must be forward - looking to achieve our inflation target, Governing Council's discussions focused on three main issues: first, the extent to which recent strength is signalling stronger economic momentum in Canada and globally; second, how heightened levels of uncertainty, particularly about US tax and trade policies, should be incorporated in our outlook; and third, how much excess capacity the economy currently has, and the growth rate of potential output going forward.

This week, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released a new estimate of economic growth, revising their short - term estimate upwards because of...

If they «re rising because there is general confidence that the economic growth will continue and that «s why interest rates are rising because stocks are actually — the return of companies is actually providing a competition for funds, that «s a positive thing.

So when economic growth slows because of weak investment, trade slows disproportionately.

Only 5 of the constituents are tech companies, which is a problem because the tech sector accounts for a great proportion of U.S. economic growth.

Potential economic growth is going to slow dramatically over the coming years because of slowing growth in the labor force, due to growing demographic trends, and continued poor productivity performance.

Subsequent surpluses will be restrained because global economic growth is unlikely to strengthen as it did in the 1990s and the early years of this century.

The second is when you are at max revenue growth, but don't yet have good unit economics because you can get in the trap of continuing to burn your excess capital to fund for the revenue growth whereas if you had more constrained capital, you would start to think about converting that revenue growth to actual unit economic growth.

In fact I suspect the reason credit growth in the past year or two has not slowed nearly as sharply as it should, or as sharply as required by the economic analysis implicit in the Third Plenum reform proposals, is precisely because of the expected impact of meaningful credit constraint on GDP growth.

This needs to be addressed because of the pending adverse impacts of an ageing population on economic growth and on government revenues and spending.

During the second half of the 1990s, the Liberal government was «blessed» with ever growing surpluses, largely because of rapid global economic growth, especially from the United States.

As a result, and because of the Bullwhip Effect, growth in developing economies is going to be jerked around more than people think, making for a good deal of cyclical economic contagion.

However, the deficit was eliminated within three years, in part, because of unexpected strong global economic growth.

In my September 1 blog entry I argued that economists typically focus on managing the asset side of the balance sheet, and almost never on the liability side, because they implicitly understand both the extent and the nature of economic growth to be almost wholly a function of the ways in which assets are managed.

To rein in credit growth, Beijing must force a sharp deceleration in investment growth, which, because investment growth is a substantial source of economic activity, means laying off a large number of workers employed in investment - related activity.

Incomes have become decoupled from economic growth because a large and rising share of economic growth has gone to households at the top of the ladder.

«The market went through a process of pricing down China because of the economic forecast, but what's important to note is that the relationship between GDP growth and equity markets is almost always non-existent,» Gendreau says.

I hoped that this wouldn't happen, because the longer reported GDP growth remained high, the worse for China's economy over the medium to long term, but in the end the pace of adjustment was always going to be driven by political variables, not economic variables, and this made it very hard to project with much confidence.

The objective of the EEZ Act is the familiar sustainability rhetoric — enable economic growth while maintaining ecological integrity — but it is tricky business because these are large capital - intensive projects in remote locations that bring environmental risks that are considered low probability with severe consequences.

Instead, they claim that such requirements would impair their ability to compete and lend — and that claim carries a lot of weight because less lending would very likely translate to slower economic growth.

Because of the important roles business and consumer confidence play in fostering economic growth, central bank officials often find themselves taking too - rosy a view of the economic figures.

At the same time, global investment spending has moderated, in part because of lower potential economic growth; firms need to invest less than they did in the past to sustain that lower potential output.

The transit agencies also face reduced sales tax revenue because of increased e-commerce and Illinois» poor economic growth.

Because we recognize that limited access to financial services is one of the main hurdles to economic growth and prosperity, we support many projects that encourage lending to entrepreneurs running small - and medium - size enterprises (SMEs).

«Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March indicates that growth in economic activity has picked up recently, after having slowed sharply during the winter in part because of adverse weather conditions,» the FOMC statement read.

Although most analysts considered Brazil to have a solid growth plan, the country has encountered rough seas because of policies that may have supported short - term economic performance but strangled sustainable growth.

Now, with that out of the way, the more important factor is what the Bank sees as the trajectory of economic growth for Canada, because that will be fixed income investors» guide for how it will react to disappointment or surprises along the way.

Canada has not released an economic impact study of the TPP, likely because the effect on GDP and job growth will be so small (and possibly negative, according to one study).

Indeed, because the level of interest rates at any point in time is highly correlated with the level of nominal economic growth over the preceding decade, the relationship between starting valuations and actual subsequent S&P 500 nominal total returns is nearly independent of interest rates.

Most economists agree that when lawmakers raise taxes, economic growth suffers because of the negative impact of higher taxes on investment.

They didn't, because the theory of the Republican tax plan is completely different, namely that cutting corporate tax rates will incentivize more business investment in capital goods, thus spurring higher productivity, more economic growth, and higher wages over the long run.

The recently published minute of the Fed's meeting last month showed some members of the policy committee have argued for raising interest rates more quickly in coming months because of strong economic growth, a robust job market and rising inflation, which last month exceeded the Fed's target of 2 percent.

As my colleague Dylan Matthews points out, it's a bit of a strange argument, because even if a new NAFTA boosted US economic growth, funds for the wall would still come from US taxpayers.