Not exact matches
Yet Benedict was suspicious
of liberation theologians
because some aligned themselves with
political movements that sought to overthrow repressive governments in Latin America, other historians say.
The prospect
of the church aligning itself with
political movements alarmed Benedict
because of his own upbringing, says Ramon Luzarraga, a religion professor at the University
of Dayton in Ohio.
Because of that, no single piece
of legislation or
political movement can assist this pro-life cause.
I must say (and I want readers to be absolutely clear about this) that all the
political and social
movements which Christian friends
of mine have joined precisely
because they wanted to help the poor — that these
movements very rarely show a concern to seek out, to find, to help the really poor.
Because he rooted his new
political realism in his own theological conversion — his new meditation on the wisdom and trustworthy observations
of Augustine — Niebuhr called the new
movement he called for by the theological name, Renewed Orthodoxy or Neo-Orthodoxy.
No, Weyrich insisted, what got us going as a
political movement was the attempt on the part
of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to rescind the tax - exempt status
of Bob Jones University
because of its racially discriminatory policies.»
Unfortunately, as women, we have found it difficult to persuade the churches and the ecumenical
movement that the issue
of violence against women is as much an issue
of ecclesiology as is complicity in
political conflicts,
because women have been silent for too long and the churches too have been complicit by their often silence, but also by their sometimes legitimization
of the violence theologically.
His reply is that a faith
of strong convictions is needed,
because only faith
of that kind will be able to inspire a
movement for cultural and
political change.
But precisely
because it is a
movement made up
of many races and ethnicities, many worship styles, and many
political persuasions, it hasn't taken much for one group
of evangelicals to become embarrassed at the unseemly views and behavior
of other evangelicals.
The conquest
of the
political culture
of the black community by the culture
of the left has allowed someone like Farrakhan to gain an acceptance and support that far exceeds that
of any comparable black demagogue in the past including Malcolm X, who in his lifetime, it should be remembered, was condemned and isolated by the leadership
of the black civil rights
movement precisely
because of his rhetorical violence and racial politics.
I note this with particular importance
because one
of the dangers, which, I hope, the ecumenical
movement and the churches should avoid, is that
of being «sucked» into the glib use
of this word as part
of the rhetoric
of «
political advocacy», or as a euphemism for things we do not like or have been opposed to in the past.
Emancipation from the endless discussions
of committee meetings, trying to solve problems in both religious and
political communities that had hitherto occupied so much
of my time, was a desirable freedom from the chores
of a democratic society; but it also meant an emancipation from responsibility — a doubtful boon,
because responsibility engages us in the causes
of moral,
political and religious
movements.
The result: Trump supporters dug in even deeper in their support
of him (especially when the news cycle shifted back to Clinton)
because they were already so emotionally invested in him and his
political movement.
Perhaps a new «third way» that avoids the over-simplistic definitions
of right - wing capitalism and left - wing socialism is needed,
because even though the aims
of the protest
movement would seem to be leaning towards a social - democratic, «leftist» welfare state, a significant number
of protesters clearly do not wish to detach themselves from the
political right, and are very much opposed to being associated with the left.
The best possible
political use
of opposition to cutting lone parent benefits was made
because it was left neither to enemies
of the working class to cynically exploit — specifically the Liberal Democrats — nor simply to those most affected or more minority forces in the labour
movement.
That is the scenario in which most Spanish
political parties would veto Scotland entry in the EU,
because of the risk
of setting a precedent for Spain own breakaway
movements.
«They are coming at the union
movement piece by piece,» he said to the assembled union leaders and members,
because of labor's
political clout and «
because you built and protect the middle class.»
Scotland, with the lowest Tory vote in the UK, will become an immense thorn in Blair's side
because the Scottish Assembly will create an independent base
of political activity for the Scottish labour
movement.
A day after being criticized for her reaction to
political journalist and NBC News contributor Mark Halperin's alleged sexual harassment
of female colleagues, «Morning Joe» cohost Mika Brzezinski issued a lengthy statement about the embattled journalist who was a fixture on her show, saying we are «witnessing a larger
movement of women speaking up about sexual harassment
because the fear
of being dismissed or not believed is melting away.»
There were modest gains in the 1970s «largely
because of the women's
movement,» according to Zoe Oxley,
political science professor at Union College.
I think in fairness to Steve Hart, Unite's strategy makes union backed candidates from a broader social background part
of their
political strategy, but certainly not the end
of it: At the Unite meeting at Labour Conference, Jon Trickett & Len McCluskey made the case for Unite & Labour developing MP's from down to earth backgrounds, but linked this very much to having policies that adress the needs
of working class voters: The Unite strategy is fairly broad, including recruitng union members to Labour, developing MP's (who as McCluskey are backed
because they «reflect the values
of the union
movement» — rather than just being from a particular social class), and supporting the CLASS think tank to develop policy — I did a write up
of this meeting for the Morning Star (and a rival Progress one), which may be
of interest (I think it will appear if you click on my name)
McKibben: Well, it's not quite the same,
because we're not, you know, we [wouldn't] try to, sort
of, do a big
political campaign around it, but it is the way that this, you know, the things like this locavore
movement and local agriculture in general have spread very rapidly from local farmers» market [s] to the fastest growing part
of the food economy in this country and have been for a decade now, they're just booming everywhere.
That's
because he is one: a man who reads Nietzsche for a hobby, he thinks that the central message
of Buddhism is «every man for himself» and that the London Underground is a
political movement.
Home schooling clearly continues to be a
political (and other)
movement because its advocates know they must labor to keep fundamental parental rights over the education and upbringing
of children recognized and protected from statist academics and government violation.
The findings are important
because of what they may contribute to the debate over changing how teacher evaluation is conducted, which has emerged as a hot - button
political issue favored by the so - called education reform
movement.
The Democratic Party has been called «the graveyard
of social
movements» for a reason,
because once you accept the idea that defeating the Republicans is the most important
political strategy, it makes sense to prioritize that over everything else.
However, if they were part
of a
political movement that was influencing the gov» t to sell all its snow - blowers and sand trucks
because this whole «winter is coming» thing is a hoax, I just might escalate the rhetoric!
The fossil free divestment
movement has been successful
because it knows that fighting for climate justice is about changing the power dynamics
of our
political system and standing up to the fossil fuel industry.
Ironically if you capitalize Consensus then your statement is more or less correct,
because the Consensus is a
political movement and this letter reminds Congress
of that.
I was very skeptical
of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (though not the possibility
of some AGW) from the moment I heard about it as a major
political movement,
because it «smelled» to much like the Alarmist «Population Bomb» and «Peek Oil»
movements, and was being pushed by many
of the same kind
of people.
Although a strong majority
of Americans do support addressing the issue, policymakers can delay action without facing
political consequences
because the denial
movement has successfully planted the seed
of doubt in the public consciousness.
What we should take away from the whole sorry episode is that this zeal for challenging the character
of climate - change skeptics — while excusing both the
political / financial connections, and sloppy science,
of true believers
because their cause is supposedly noble — represents the final degeneration
of the global warming
movement into pure politics.
But the only reason that it is necessary that climate change will increase the number
of deaths from Nth order effects is
because the environmental
movement have displaced from the
political agenda any possibility
of technological advance and economic development that doesn't meet their requirements
of «sustainability».
Because it seems to me that nobody at Westlaw has bothered to turn on CNN International, BBC and Al Jazeera over the past 8 months and had a serious think about what will be the results
of the mass
political movements in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria as well as the changes afoot in Morocco and Jordan.
People began looking into the records
because of the #DeleteFacebook
movement, which followed the revelation that the Facebook data
of 50 million users was abused by
political data firm Cambridge...