Some couples choose separation
because of religious values that forbid divorce.
Gresh encourages young people to abstain from sex
because of her religious values but also presented a neuroscientific case against casual sex:
Not exact matches
Coalition personnel and their local partners have a database
of «category - one structures» that they will avoid targeting
because they have infrastructural or historic
value, including
religious centers or hospitals.
Tell me, if the school charged the actual market
value for the use
of this space and the use
of equipment, etc. and if that market
value actually reflected the cost to the public, then the issue might become clearer to you
because these
religious people would scream at having to pay full price and the cost
of any damages they may inflict upon the public property they are using illegally.
Well, it's
because no
religious value, rule, law, tenet, or bit
of dogma EVER trumps this nation's laws and we all agree on that, otherwise you might as well make the sleazy pope President and let the Ayatollah Khomeni be Vice President and we will live under
religious sharia law with death for anyone who speaks blasphemy or who «dishonors» any
religious figure whether real or not.
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid
of the
religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance
religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is
of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel
of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation»
because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
In fact, I see the decision as a victory for
religious freedom in the sense that people whose religion supports and encourages same - sex unions will no longer be prohibited from practicing that important
religious value simply
because some
of their neighbors hold a different view.
The picture above the article is displaying a group
of Catholic sisters (Dominican Sisters
of Mary, Mother
of the Eucharist) that never belonged to the Leadership Conference
of Women
Religious, but instead started the Council
of Major Superiors
of Women
Religious because they disagreed with the
values of the LCWR.
Rush Limbach's comments will be taken as gospel for the Right, but they truely illustrate the reason the GOP is in turmoil... the leaders need the
Religious Right to win, but know they are being intellectually dishonest
because their
values do not match the
Religious Right, except on the abortion issue, whhich will never go away
because the GOP needs that 20 %
of voters who would otherwise vote Democrat becasue the Liberal
values match Christian
values more closely.
Those
of you who will not patronize Chick Fil - A
because of their right to express their
religious beliefs are the very people who would impose their immoral
values on us.
Once all the disclaimers have been made — that many
religious beliefs are supremely difficult to test for truth
because they refer to the supernatural or to that which it is beyond our mental powers to discern, or
because (in the case
of faith) they are
values and not truth - claims — once all this has been said, we still have to admit that yes,
of course the question
of truth enters in here.
Because religious conservatives sense this conflict between general television and their own
values and beliefs, their viewing
of religious programs is both an act
of protest against general television and an expression
of support for the beliefs associated with
religious programs.
These differences between the «mainstreams» cultivated by
religious and general television are significant
because for many years general television has been functioning as a powerful, and perhaps even the major, cultivator
of our society's
values, attitudes and behavior.
I hope that you are actually one
of those who just ignores the fact that atheism is amoral and chooses to follow our society's
religious values anyway and not one
of those who secretly uses people
because they realize there's nothing wrong with it.
A
religious ritual without a relationship with God is
of little to no
value at all... she feels uncomfortable with explaining her kosher / non kosher
because there is no God in it... just rituals.
Many
religious people have more refined version
of their beliefs
because of their moral
value they may have.
This is at first glance an anomalous position to find Habermas taking,
because he generally appears to be skeptical
of religion, treating it as a form
of ideology that systematically distorts communication by virtue
of the fact that
religious people generally seem to be unable to abandon their own suppositions long enough to truly consider the interests and
values of others.
He has taken on the monumental task
of rethinking the principles
of humanitarian intervention within an ethical framework based upon «universal»
religious tenets — universal
because they are core
values in all these
religious traditions.
It is the opinion
of this author that this model is
of significant
value for the
religious communicator
because of its empirical basis, its comprehensiveness, its clarity, and its applicability in understanding the
religious television situation.
Even so, such people are often accused
of having a «hidden
religious agenda»
because of the remnants
of the Hebrew - Christian tradition in the schools»
religious values, holidays and customs.
«
Because of that, we have to develop narratives, frames
of reference, language, and tools that connect climate change to people's
religious values and identity.»
This partiality is unjustified,
because Cruise's
religious affiliation is not germane to his acting abilities or the entertainment
value of his movie.
Contrary to the assertion that these programs focus on «
values» — the «Gospel message» is about salvation, and contains no «
values lesson» — it is a
religious doctrine, and
because of this, belongs to religion — and not in our public school classrooms.
Because religious schools violate your personal sensibilities, you are telling low - income families — often single mothers, often people of color — that you want to deny them a choice they want for their kid, because of your
Because religious schools violate your personal sensibilities, you are telling low - income families — often single mothers, often people
of color — that you want to deny them a choice they want for their kid,
because of your
because of your
values.
We have uplifted shared
values of justice, responsibility, and stewardship in numerous rounds
of public comments and hearings about this proposed coal terminal
because our
religious traditions tell us that we have moral responsibility to protect and care for God's creation and our communities.
People
of faith are in favor
of I - 1631
because it aligns with our shared
religious values of justice, responsibility and stewardship.
Apart from being unreasonable
because it isn't linked to actual discrimination by TWU grads (which discrimination might justify the need for protection) it also fails to give weight to the charter
values of religious freedom and freedom
of association reflected in sections 2 and 15 (1)
of the Charter, to say nothing
of the provincial protections afforded to TWU's conduct under section 41
of the BC human rights code (and similar provisions in other provinces).