One reason foot props are not common on U.S. car seats is
because of the crash testing methods used in this country.
Not exact matches
But
because of poor design and lack
of adequate
testing, the app frequently
crashed.
The number
of mini flash
crashes experienced during the
test window relative to other 9:30 — 9:33 windows is abnormal
because (a) the thirteen mini flash
crashes during the
test window is 2.6 times greater than the greatest number
of mini flash
crashes experienced during any other 9:30 — 9:33 window; (b) the eleven unique equities that experienced a mini flash
crash during the
test window is 2.2 times greater than the greatest number
of unique equities which experienced a mini flash
crash during any other 9:30 — 9:33 window; and (c) the frequency
of mini flash
crashes normalized by the number
of trades executed is greater during the
test window than it was during any other 9:30 — 9:33 window.
Even the path to that
crash was bumpy: hours after it started
testing its self - driving cars in December, the California Department
of Motor Vehicles told it to halt
because it hadn't received the proper permit.
Meaning it's sitting between the baby and the seat (so not an outer shell, more like a shell the baby goes into, inside
of the seat)-- every carseat manufacturer warns against using products like this,
because they are things going into the carseat between the baby and seat / straps, and it wasn't
crash tested with.
Because these items were not included in car seat safety
tests and may impact the physics
of how a seat functions in a
crash.
The team actually found that every car seat they
crash tested would be effective in keeping a baby safe,
because, according to the press release, «they absorbed
crash forces while controlling the motion
of the child, making rear - facing car seats a good choice in this scenario.»
Possibly the best beginner racing drone on the market, this model is constructed with impact - resistant, easy - to - repair materials.Feel free to
crash and learn,
because this drone stands the
test of time and impact.
The number
of space objects has shot up in the past five years
because of China's 2007
test of an antisatellite weapon and the 2009
crash between Russian and U.S. satellites.
Think about who you are and
Because the US population is aging and becoming more obese, the University
of Michigan believed it was time to modernize the design
of crash -
test dummies
For many lovelorn singletons, the holidays are the loneliest time
of year and, in the New Year, the $ 1 billion online dating industry sees a surge in users
Because the US population is aging and becoming more obese, the University
of Michigan believed it was time to modernize the design
of crash -
test dummies
Because the US population is aging and becoming more obese, the University
of Michigan believed it was time to modernize the design
of crash -
test dummies The one - stop, all - you - need - to - know, ultimate online and app dating guide.
Safety, Features & Pricing The Beetle convertible has not been
crash -
tested;
because of its structural differences, ratings for the coupe do not carry over.
You can trust this SUV 4X4
because it has a
crash test rating
of 4 out
of 5 stars!
You can trust this crossover awd
because it has a
crash test rating
of 4 out
of 5 stars!
This
crash test is particularly challenging
because the occupants move both forward and toward the side
of the vehicle at the same time.
The old term «They sure don't build»em like they used to» should always be followed up with a «Good,»
because modern cars perform better in
crash tests than any
of the land yachts
of the 1970s.
«Criteria to win are tough
because TOP SAFETY PICK is intended to drive continued improvements such as top
crash test ratings and rapid addition
of electronic stability control, which is standard equipment on the TSX,» says Institute president Adrian Lund.
As a result, the Institute averaged results
of both
tests and downgraded the Dart's restraints and kinematics rating to marginal
because doors shouldn't open in a
crash.
Though the April auto issue is printed and on newsstands now, the magazine has also pulled its «recommended» ratings from the Hyundai Elantra, Mazda3, Honda Element, Mitsubishi Outlander, Suzuki Grand Vitara and Nissan Altima, all
because of poor performance in Insurance Institute
crash tests.
The
test is more difficult than the head - on
crashes conducted by the government or the IIHS moderate overlap
test because most
of the vehicle's front - end crush zone is bypassed.
You can trust this coupe
because it has a
crash test rating
of 5 out
of 5 stars!
The reason the vehicle scored so well in the
crash tests is
because of its Advanced Compatibility Engineering (ACE) body structure.
When you think that most
crashes happend at 80km / h you would really reconsider these
tests,
because with that kind
of speed, it won't do much good.
You can trust this crossover
because it has a
crash test rating
of 4 out
of 5 stars!
Two
tests of the A4 were conducted
because, in the first
test, the vehicle's electrical system did not deploy the airbags due to a
crash test preparation error.
In many ways, the huge discrepancy between this year and last year is
because of the new small - overlap
crash test.
- Consumer Reports didn't recommend any vehicles from these 11 brands, either
because of low road
test scores, poor
crash test performance or questionable reliability: Fiat, Jeep, Land Rover, Alfa Romeo, Mitsubishi, Jaguar, GMC, Dodge, Mini, Cadillac and Volvo.
Ford was quick to trumpet the latest round
of NHTSA
testing because its 2000 Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable retained five - star ratings for the driver and passenger in frontal
crashes.
You can trust this 3 dr hatchback
because it has a
crash test rating
of 4 out
of 5 stars!
Description
of Recall: ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, ANALYSIS OF AN A SIDE IMPACT CRASH TEST CONDUCTED BY THE NHTSA; S NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP) INDICATED THAT THE OUTBOARD ANCHORAGE OF THE DRIVER»S SEAT BELT COULD DISCONNECT BECAUSE OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE SEAT TRIM AND THE ANCHORAGE CONNECTOR WHEN THE SEAT WAS ADJUSTED TO ITS LOWEST POSITIO
of Recall: ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, ANALYSIS
OF AN A SIDE IMPACT CRASH TEST CONDUCTED BY THE NHTSA; S NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP) INDICATED THAT THE OUTBOARD ANCHORAGE OF THE DRIVER»S SEAT BELT COULD DISCONNECT BECAUSE OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE SEAT TRIM AND THE ANCHORAGE CONNECTOR WHEN THE SEAT WAS ADJUSTED TO ITS LOWEST POSITIO
OF AN A SIDE IMPACT
CRASH TEST CONDUCTED BY THE NHTSA; S NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP) INDICATED THAT THE OUTBOARD ANCHORAGE
OF THE DRIVER»S SEAT BELT COULD DISCONNECT BECAUSE OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE SEAT TRIM AND THE ANCHORAGE CONNECTOR WHEN THE SEAT WAS ADJUSTED TO ITS LOWEST POSITIO
OF THE DRIVER»S SEAT BELT COULD DISCONNECT
BECAUSE OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE SEAT TRIM AND THE ANCHORAGE CONNECTOR WHEN THE SEAT WAS ADJUSTED TO ITS LOWEST POSITIO
OF CONTACT BETWEEN THE SEAT TRIM AND THE ANCHORAGE CONNECTOR WHEN THE SEAT WAS ADJUSTED TO ITS LOWEST POSITION.
The 2016 Volkswagen Golf received a Top Safety Pick Plus rating from the IIHS
because of its good
test performance, on top
of its
crash prevention technologies such as forward collision warning and low - speed autobrake.
That's
because, in a small overlap
test, the main structures
of the vehicle's front - end crush zone are bypassed, making it hard for the vehicle to manage
crash energy.
Following news
of a six - month delay back in November, we heard an interesting rumor that Alfa Romeo's latest sports sedan the Giulia was delayed
because it couldn't pass
crash tests.
Because only 40 percent
of the front end is involved, this
test places a far greater stress on the structure
of the vehicle than the federal frontal
crash test.
The 2000 S80 was one
of five midsized luxury cars that performed well in the institute's high - speed
crash tests, but the research organization for auto insurers withheld its top rating from the S80
because of concerns about air bags.
Asked about General Motors Corp.'s recent decision to cancel its GM - 80 program to build a plastic - body replacement for the Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac Firebird by 1989, Du Pont denied that the project was scrapped
because of the plastic's failure to pass
crash tests.
«Criteria to win Top Safety Pick award are tough
because they're intended to drive continued safety improvements such as high
crash test ratings and rapid addition
of ESC,» says Institute president Adrian Lund.
Despite the good driver - side small overlap rating and good ratings in the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint
tests, the Titan isn't eligible for a Top Safety Pick award
because it has no available front
crash prevention system and both
of its available headlight systems earn a marginal rating.
Because of these energy - absorbing units, damage to the front and rear
of the U.S. Beetles was less than to the European Beetles in 20 mph front - into - rear
crash tests.
«Many SUVs didn't earn good ratings in our
crash tests, and on the road they were more likely than cars to get in serious single - vehicle
crashes, including rollovers,
because of their higher centers
of gravity.
«Criteria to win are tough
because Top Safety Pick is intended to drive continued improvements such as good
crash test ratings and rapid addition
of electronic stability control, which is standard equipment on 9
of the 11 new winners,» says Institute president Adrian Lund.
You can trust this vehicle
because it has a
crash test rating
of 5 out
of 5 stars!
Then comes the Sonata Hybrid, plus recent news that the only two cars to ace the latest NHTSA highway safety
crash tests with five stars were the BMW 5 Series and Hyundai Sonata, and reports out
of Europe that Hyundai is working on a station wagon for 2012, although a U.S. version is doubtful
because of Americans» dislike for station wagons and minivans.
Because the small overlap
crash test is so new, the IIHS only requires cars to score «good» or «acceptable» on it to earn a Top Safety Pick rating — provided they ace all four
of the organization's other
crash tests (moderate front overlap, side, rollover, and rear).
You can trust this extended cab pickup 4x4
because it has a
crash test rating
of 4 out
of 5 stars!
The video below shows the carnage
of the new IIHS
test shattering the A4's front pillars and popping the Audi's door open after the collision — a big no - no in
crash safety
because if the vehicle is hit again after the initial
crash it will then eject occupants onto the road.
It could be
because the GSOD will only be on
test builds, wherein
crashes are more
of an inconvenience and not something as disastrous as the BSoD on a regular user's computer.