Points are given if a student's neighborhood school is overcrowded, if a student's sibling attends the school, if the student has been wait - listed at another magnet, and a student's race is also considered
because of the desegregation mission of magnet schools.
Not exact matches
This is why I believe it's so important to study both historical religious arguments supporting the abolition
of slavery and historical religious arguments opposing the abolition
of slavery (see my post on Mark Noll's The Civil War as a Theological Crisis» for a sampling), as well as historical religious arguments supporting
desegregation and historical religious arguments opposing
desegregation — not
because I believe both sides are equal, but
because the patterns
of argumentation that emerge are so unnervingly familiar:
The public schools in Prince Edward had been closed since 1959
because of «massive resistance» to
desegregation, as Leslie «Skip» Griffin Jr., Ed.M.»
Because pairing and clustering mandates student involvement in
desegregation and typically requires that students travel greater distances than under the redrawing
of school catchment areas or other voluntary
desegregation plans, the finding that this plan type produces the largest enrollment response is consistent with expectations.
The program, the court ruled, is «outside the scope
of [the 1975
desegregation ruling]
because it provides aid to students rather than to private schools.»
To comply with NCLB, the Richland Parish School Board notified parents that the Rayville Elementary School was failing, but on the advice
of its legal counsel it prohibited Rayville's white students from transferring to certain other schools
because of provisions «in the federal Richland Parish School
desegregation case.»
True,
desegregation in places like Boston was a failure
because it mixed poor whites and poor blacks and spawned white flight by not giving parents any say in the matter
of where their children went to school.
Even worse,
because the move is «part
of the Sheff
desegregation settlement» it will make a mockery
of the historic effort and the tens
of million in public funds that have been spent to implement the Sheff settlement initiatives to date.
Darien Franco, 2011 graduate
of Capital Preparatory Magnet School told me, «I think that the
desegregation goal is a bit superficial
because what I assume is the whole point is part
of an effort to make sure everyone's getting a similar, quality education.
Over the past generation, federal courts have stopped monitoring
desegregation plans that school districts had implemented
because of earlier court orders; in 2007, the Supreme Court went so far as to overturn voluntary
desegregation plans in Seattle and Louisville.
I am focusing on magnet schools in this essay
because these schools are designed to have a specific racial balance in order to achieve the goal
of desegregating Connecticut's public schools, yet demographics play out differently depending on the school, and some schools are struggling to maintain their required
desegregation standards.
In Cleveland, a federal judge surprised the nation last May by deciding the district's longtime
desegregation plan wasn't enough,
because only one
of its two high schools is racially integrated.
But what both sides fail to understand is that
desegregation was pursued mostly as a last resort; blacks wouldn't achieve it immediately through the fiscal means (equal funding
of schools) simply
because of the opposition
of Jim Crow segregationist - controlled school boards and legislatures.
Busing ended
because of a combination
of white protest, media that overemphasized resistance, and the lack
of systematic collection to judge the impact
of desegregation.
By Shawnta Barnes and David McGuire In their article, «Decades after civil rights gains, black teachers a rarity in public schools» USA Today noted, «
Because most white communities in the 1950s and 1960s preferred white teachers over black ones, court - ordered
desegregation often ended the teaching careers
of black educators.»
Because the DOJ is not a party to all
desegregation lawsuits, the list
of lawsuits it maintains on its website, while useful, is not an exhaustive account
of these cases in the United States.
In their article, «Decades after civil rights gains, black teachers a rarity in public schools» USA Today noted, «
Because most white communities in the 1950s and 1960s preferred white teachers over black ones, court - ordered
desegregation often ended the teaching careers
of black educators.»
Because the LAUSD magnet schools were created with the objective
of desegregation, it is this transitioning group
of schools that are relevant for analyzing integration levels, if it is the case that LAUSD magnets are changing goals.
Because racial integration and
desegregation are part
of the guidelines, it appears that these are still goals
of LAUSD magnet schools.
Because the court's conclusion led to the forbidding
of even voluntary
desegregation, magnet schools lost one
of their mechanisms for creating racially diverse schools.