Sentences with phrase «because of the money issue»

The denomination would not send a pastor to the first church because of the money issue.

I did not realise or understand the importance of a good education and job until to late and after my last girlfriend dumpingrme because of money issues I am close to giving up all together.

The daiper one can go both ways, me having to use cloth daipers because of money issues and seeing mom next door having it good with disposables..

So far, gaining access to universities in their host countries has been very difficult for Syrian students, because of money issues, language barriers, and laws that don't allow them to enroll in local universities or leave the refugee camps if they live there.

(Which I'm not, but not because of money issues!

Many companies won't hesitate to get someone younger to take over the position held by a senior professional because of money issues.

Not exact matches

The story that bitcoin victims are being sold is that, because we can not trust government - issued currencies, bitcoin is the future of money.

Jackson did not speak directly to the issue when summoned, though he elaborated in the court filing: «Just because I am photographed in or next to a certain vehicle, wearing an article of clothing, holding a product, sitting next to what appears to be large sums of money or modeling expensive pieces of jewelry does not mean that I own everything in those photos,» he wrote.

«The issue of me running for political office frequently comes up because I am constantly touring around, giving speeches and raising money for the party,» he said in a statement.

Speaking with CNBC on the sidelines of the Money 20/20 conference in Singapore, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said he had previously indicated to some entrepreneurs looking to issue digital tokens of their own that they should «save some of those proceeds» because they could potentially be sued if their token lost mMoney 20/20 conference in Singapore, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said he had previously indicated to some entrepreneurs looking to issue digital tokens of their own that they should «save some of those proceeds» because they could potentially be sued if their token lost moneymoney.

The revenue share issue is solved by giving artists 98 % of all royalties, the censorship issue because the power remains in the artists hands, and the transparency issue because labels can no longer hide money from the artists.

This issue is perhaps the thorniest of all, because at its core a publicly traded corporation exists to make as much money for execs and shareholders as possible.

But one of the most recurrent questions I receive everyday revolves around the issue of raising capital and unfortunately, raising money for a business is one of the hardest tasks an entrepreneur must perform because without capital; there will be no business.

«Yes, they're not spending the money, they're not hiring, but is it because of this issue?»

The issue is, a lot of people don't have a lot of money to invest, and they also can't afford to take too much risk because they don't have that much to invest.

I find this lesson the hardest because nobody wants to be left out of a hot issue or a new way to make money.

It was said that «the best of defense is to attack»... --- Those allowed such to be signed knew all the time that this is what was going to happen because it happened repeatedly through out history from time of the crusaders but still they continued with signing it because it meant for them money pouring in for all involved with the trading on this issue which has spoiled the life of the Palestinians and all Arabs ever started war over those lands started with swords and horses that has developed into the present arms that we became to know and only God knows how future arms would look like in few de-ca-des or cen - tur - ies that are yet to come...?!

«It's not just within the relationship, but also outside of them because money is such a sensitive issue.»

Doesn't change the money issue (Wenger did his best to say I'd of loved to sign Laporte any day of the week but we can't compete once City get involved which is true but no one paid attention because that doesn't fit the narrative.)

The amount of money you would have to pay them, if you pay them a certain amount they would have to get that much money and even more because of taxable benefit issues just to pay for the value of their scholarship.

Thierry Henry has said it all, that there's is a problem in arsenal, there was a time he don't even relate with his teams mate and he question why Sanchez will remain at arsenal after the display against Liverpool, I have said it before the big issue on ground is not money that the player are demanding but the ambition of the club... henry also said, when u are playing for arsenal u are comfortable whether u are playing well or not because there's no pressure on u....

Of course the money issue is a problem, because although Arsenal are in a financially strong position, to shell out almost a quarter of a million a week to one player, is a very large sum of moneOf course the money issue is a problem, because although Arsenal are in a financially strong position, to shell out almost a quarter of a million a week to one player, is a very large sum of moneof a million a week to one player, is a very large sum of moneof money!

How many of those guys do you think would be willing to re-invest in the clubs transfer fund, how many do you think would want to recouparate their money and how many would want to sack the man in charge... I remind you of Usmanov who promised millions in transfer money to Arsenal, but its not his call to make... till the board votes unanimously on the issue or one invididual buys out the other board members for all the controlling shares... we are limited to how much we can spend because its not one persons money its all of theirs.

We must change things are board level because someone there must have an issue with spending money, great finacial figures released by Arsenal again & we spend 5 million in the transfer window & to be fair spent little in the summer too in comparsion to everyone else, all we get is it is not easy to find you players & I take on board some of what Wengers says but at this stage we must bring in someone to help him because he is ntrying to do too much at the club & I would gladly through my hat in the ring to be come head of purchasing but I have a feeling they would not let me spend a penny HELP WANTED to improve the same old story

He takes the pain relief medicine, buys the (un-needed) car, but still has need of surgery; after ten years, he can't drive the cars because he hasn't performed the surgery, he prefers to hire a driver, he still takes the pain relief drugs, he still feels the pains, he still needs the surgery, he has money, everyone urges him to fix his health issues, but he thinks he can still manage on with it.

It's not money that is the real issue... It is the deluded man that refuses to spend them, because of belief in failed ideas and players.

The old kissing of the club badge has become something of an issue in football these days, mainly because a lot of fans feel that the huge amounts of money that now floods in with TV deals, shirt sponsors and all sorts of commercial deals have generally eroded the loyalty of players and also because a spot of badge kissing is often followed quickly by a transfer to another club.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Browns rookie Jabrill Peppers is yet to sign his rookie deal because of issues with the amount of guaranteed money in his deal, per PFT.

If money isn't an issue then why not get rid of Kroenke, what use is he apart from having no infrastructure on the board, because it's filled with his accountants, figuring out how to rip of the fans and season ticket holders, to pay for his 3.5 million pounds worth of «advice»?

When I talk about money issues being a major issue in holding us back, I meant about our lack of willingness to pay for what we think we need, primarily because we think we can't afford it.

If I ran the world I'd tell you he needs to get in to see a good therapist who knows something about family systems theory ASAP to help him work out at least a few of his own issues (cough * denial * cough), but I'd bet cash money that he'd never go to see someone because he «doesn't need to.»

The alternative, issuing bonds and borrowing money, could cost taxpayers $ 4 million more because of interest payments on the debt, park officials have said.

The fact is that the European Union issue is more important than any of that, because it's about the decision of whether you want your laws made in Brussels and that march towards ever - closer union, or whether you want our country to make its own laws, our politicians to make the laws in this country, for us to be able to determine our immigration policy, to decide how we're spending our public money.

The delay in state payments led to temporary pink slips being issued to dozens of carpenters and other tradesmen at the Solar City site because the contractors ran out of money.

«The real issue is the distribution of that money, because we have an education inequality problem in this state.»

We might believe that the reraising of the email legal issue days before the election unfairly tilted it one way, or emotive appeal or money unfairly tilted it another way, or that economic issues in some country promoted a racist candidate in that country to high office, but we don't argue that the election result becomes legally incorrect or invalidated because people (in our view) misjudged based on all they heard and knew.

«The issue is not a lack of resources - but there are problems because money is not unlimited - it is making sure all of the people in the system work effectively together,» he explained to Today.

The power behind the FFaC clause is that it, can promise repayment of debt securities they issue because they can raise money through taxes.

Now I subsequently heard about it because there was a to - and - fro over this money, contribution issue till somebody finally called me that this is what is going on: «They know me, they want to give me the money and I can pass it on, not give it to Victor Smith and Victor Smith is saying that: «no, he would take it to the prof, [because] I'm not the one who is going to be the candidate,» blah blah blah blah that type of rubbish.

He's a county leader... Clyde Williams makes a lot of background noise because he is a wonderful candidate and he too is raising the money and raising the issues.»

Singas said those funds were some of the same monies at issue in Ippolito's federal case — with a $ 400,000 difference because Nassau prosecutors focused on Ippolito's return to a period of government employment that started in 2009.

And that, according a just - issued report by the state comptroller, is because of the drop in gasoline prices, causing significantly less sales tax money to be collected at gas stations in Suffolk, as well as other areas of New York State.

«If the government can find the money to postpone it for longer then all the better because it is a big pressure and of course you've also got bus and train fares going up in January too, so the cost of getting to work for people — there's an issue about whether work pays for a lot of low - paid workers.

Not voting tonight will not cost the taxpayers an «additional $ 250,000», his words, because what he conveniently omits from his public statements on the issue is that even if we do apply the premium to the deficit he is still going to be short of cash this year and he will still have to borrow money through short - term borrowing.

«For example how can you spend almost 25 % of the [Energy] bond that you issued on administrative cost... because we've [Ghana] never spent that kind of money in raising funds,» she argued.

Skahen said the county initially agreed to pay all of the rent for the office because the city at the time did not have its own local development corporation to raise money by issuing bonds for nonprofit groups.

Because the message that I carry with me, I don't want it to be tainted; I don't want anyone to say, «Well, he's only suing because he wants money; that's the reason why he is talking about the whole issue of concussion.Because the message that I carry with me, I don't want it to be tainted; I don't want anyone to say, «Well, he's only suing because he wants money; that's the reason why he is talking about the whole issue of concussion.because he wants money; that's the reason why he is talking about the whole issue of concussion.»

Because science is global — i.e., global issues are truly global — there should be a flexible funding system in which co-PIs of different countries can share money, at least for research that has immediate social impact.

Some critics take issue with GMOs, not out of misplaced fear, but because they see a yawning gap between the promise of GM foods — feeding the world's poor — and what's been realized: a handful of corporations making money selling both the GM seeds and the chemicals needed to grow them.