You might think that it is made of low quality products
because of the price so my advice is to check what other people (who used it) think about it.
I don't eat nuts everyday
because of their price so I wonder if I should add more seeds the days I don't have nuts.
Many investors do not buy newer buildings
because of price so lower K acquisition costs per door means an older building.
Not exact matches
So if you are an investor who has bought Starbucks
because of the low
price of Arabica beans, you're in it for the wrong reasons.
So if the value
of the dollar rose, Mexican companies could raise their
prices in pesos to pay for the tariff, and those higher
prices wouldn't be felt by American consumers
because higher value dollars would compensate for the difference.
From there, a human store clerk will either re-stock the aisle or put the right
price tag on the product,
because the robots are not physically capable
of doing
so.
You could argue it provides a better ecosystem
because it's open and all
of us are building on what's already there,
so there are definitely some advantages from a
pricing and capability perspective.
Third - party contracting firm benefits aren't only less generous, but the exorbitant Silicon Valley housing
prices and rents make life as a contractor
so difficult workers from contract companies often can't afford to elect a benefits package,
because doing
so will take too much out
of their paycheck.
«Quality is
so important
because we run this vertically integrated supply chain, and managing food manufacturing centers and distribution networks are [some]
of the things that allow higher - quality food at better
prices,» said Salzberg.
«Every device has the capability now
because the
price point
of chips and sensors and security is becoming
so low.
«We're already talking about lower
prices [for farmers] occurring just
because of the large supplies
of pork we're bringing to the marketplace,»
so losing business abroad could further put the squeeze on pig farmers.
Timmer: Yeah,
so last August which was a key inflection point for the market —
because at that point, nobody was expecting tax cuts anymore and the 10 - year Treasury had fallen to 2 %, and the bond market which
of course is always
pricing in the potential future, was
pricing in only one more rate hike over the subsequent two years.
«
Because we're going to eliminate the maverick, T - Mobile, from having the incentives to be
so aggressive in terms
of cutting
prices,» Economides said Monday on «Closing Bell.»
Despite a long line - up
of popular shows like Narcos and Stranger Things, Netflix the company has been under some pressure — and
so has its share
price — primarily
because of fears about what the future might hold.
Research firm NPD Group earlier this month warned much
of the same would continue in 2017: it sees stalled growth and says those cutting back on restaurant visits are doing
so because they think
prices are too high.
Because the companies cover
so many people, they might have the negotiating power to make that happen, at least in one
of a number
of ways, like negotiating better
prices or building out better plans
of their own.
The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost
of manufacturing and transporting
of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable,
so what if a few American oil companies going out
of business.the cost
of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest
of us left behind, with the oil
price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the
price at pump even a penny,
because they are
so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms
of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.
A disadvantage
of Silver Eagle coins is that
because they are
so popular, they are sold at a hefty premium to the spot
price of silver.
It is also possible that stocks simply move faster today
because of the quicker pace
of news and trading, and
so drops and surges in
prices that might have been spread over days in past times are now condensed within hours.
So if you drew a horizontal line and call that fair value like Ben Graham said, and then you draw a wavy line around that horizontal line and call that stock
prices, the market is pitching us opportunities all the time between stocks that are way below fair value and way above fair value, the reason investors don't beat the market has nothing to do with the market is not throwing us pitches in that it's not still emotional, they are behavioral problem, there's agency problems, there is a lot
of other issues going on but it's not
because we're not getting really great pictures all the time.
Ironically, the trend
of companies raising less capital actually enhances the importance
of the initial round buy - in (both
because that initial buy - in becomes less diluted meaning the first round
price was that much more important and
because even if an angel wants to buy up more in later rounds they'll have less
of a chance to do
so; I also believe that along with the trend
of companies raising less capital we're also seeing earlier and somewhat smaller average exits — also enhancing the value
of initial round buy - ins as fewer investors are truly swinging for the proverbial fence).
Ben Luckock is in fact
so bullish that he forecast demand could exceed supply
of crude oil by 2 - 4 million bpd by the end
of 2019
because of the US$ 1 - trillion in spending plans that never saw the light
of day as a result
of the 2014
price crash.
While this week's
price action was certainly a step in the right direction (
so far), both the NASDAQ and Russell 2000 are now in «no man's land»
because the indexes are back above resistance
of their 20 and 50 - day averages, yet still must contend with resistance
of their prior highs and short - term downtrend lines that have formed.
So let's say that Susan thinks that XYZ Company stock is going to lose value over the next year
because of negative reviews and high
prices.
But then the Calvo Fairy is also a heroic assumption,
because she flies purely at random,
so in every period each firm has exactly the same probability
of changing its
price.
Cash transfers would likely trigger a rapid rise in equity markets,
because earnings are currently cyclically depressed,
so the asset
price effect
of cash transfers would likely be way more powerful than any impact
of «small» amounts
of QE.
«There will be headlines just
because the
price itself is
so high,» said Brad Loncar, CEO
of Loncar Investments, which runs the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF.
So, not only does your investment in currency lose money
because of inflation, but your investment also loses from the bid / ask spread — the
price of buying into a different currency.
If a consumer is saying that their costs are going up by 4 per cent
because of carbon taxes, gas
prices, and
so on, you have to ignore that as you do your work around trying to set an interest rate.
Namely, did the mortgages go bad
because of the unanticipated nationwide collapse in home
prices (a
so - called exogenous factor) or are the banks responsible for the mess
because they «misrepresented» to the mortgage purchasers the shoddy quality
of the mortgages they put in securities and pools?
«While drugs are free in public facilities, the cost
of transport often exceeds the
price we charge,
so because we deliver to the client's doorstep the model technically «cheaper than free».
The well - funded dairy lobby spends a great deal
of money (an estimated $ 80 to $ 100 million each year — ironically paid for by the higher
prices consumers pay), persuading federal and provincial politicians that supply management «protects the family farm,» «ensures food security» and that,
because these farmers are
so numerous, doing anything to upset them would be political suicide.
Because the soybean farmers and markets are
so afraid that it will tretaliate that it can buy food cheaper as a result
of the low soybean
prices.
As long as advertisers must advertise, Facebook's profits will increase, and
so will its stock
price, regardless
of the company's CEO warning that profits will take a hit
because of pesky «security» concerns.
That if the government was able to act as a
price negotiator and get
prices down, a lot
of things would open up in how we design insurance,
because people would not be
so afraid
of financial calamity.
The opportunity arose, I argued,
because it seemed to me that the oil environment was finally, in fact, ready to improve — oil stockpiles were finally dropping below 5 - year averages and declining steadily, and rig counts were due to decline as well, after
so many months
of sub-profitable oil
prices.
Basic premise (aging terribly,
so thank heavens the details are behind a paywall): lower gas
prices aren't really stimulative in Canada
because the concurrent decline in the terms
of trade is detrimental to gross domestic income, thereby crimping purchasing power, and is likely accompanied by a hit to employment (wrong again,
so far!).
But for a company that is just making ends meet
because their production costs are
so close to the gold
price, a small rise in the
price of their product will make a big difference to their bottom line.
If the
price to earnings, or the pork value is a little high, maybe it is
because earnings have been depressed,
so it might be toward the bottom
of the cycle.
I really like that D has shifted its portfolio in recent years to reduce its exposure to commodity
prices and that 90 %
of the company's sales are from regulated operations, Also, I'm a high believer in natural gass (partly
because that's what I studied in engineering
so probably biased), but Management is investing heavily in natural gas, including massive projects such as the Cove Point LNG export terminal and the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
We know that they're out there just selling us a bill
of goods, a piece
of junk, that isn't worth half the
price that they're charging for it and
so we hate the used car salesman pitch
because all they do is talk, talk, talk, talk,
because they don't want you to ask any questions.
I am using $ 5,000 per unit as my estimate
because I want to be extra conservative and
because I have not been able to find an exact break down on how many
of the 13,300 container units are the 40 ft refrigerated units as Dole's also has some 20 ft refrigerated, and completely unrefrigerated containers,
so I wanted a very conservative estimate
of price to be safe.
Nial, i learn from you
because i know you are a professional trader and i also want to be.your
price action strategy does nt only improve my trading but also reduces the stress i gone through while trading.thanks
so much Nial, to me you are the greatest mentor and the greatest techer
of simplicity trading.love all your articles.
Their cost
of capital is a function partly
of low interest rates and part
of the implicit share
price is a function
of the fact that investors have looked at equities for dividends rather than bonds for yield
because the bond market is
so expensive.
Investors should hope
so,
because the level
of stock
prices leaves little room for error.
Because of the upbeat guidance period and healthy profit surprises
so far this quarter, investors have awarded companies with higher stock
prices.
Never before have
prices in the financial markets been
so distorted and deceptive, but people now feel more secure
because it is clear that the government and its agents are hard at work ensuring that nobody can take advantage
of anbody else.
But he stresses that he did this analysis on his own
because he's been asked
so many times lately what could happen to the housing market — which has already suffered a slump in sales and an easing
of growth in
prices since tougher mortgage lending rules were introduced last summer — if interest rates inch up from historic lows.
AT&T and Time Warner have said there won't be any incentive for a combined company to threaten to withhold content or increase
prices,
because by doing
so, it would risk distributors walking away, leaving the company out tens
of millions
of dollars in ad revenue and subscription fees — far greater than any revenue AT&T might pick up from customers who would switch to its own pay - TV services in order to get Time Warner content back.
Covering up the error did not look like too bad an option at the time
because stocks were
priced at one - half
of their fair value and
so it was hard for anyone to imagine that
prices could ever again rise even to fair - value levels much less to overpriced levels.