Not exact matches
I'm a big proponent
of classroom education and never would have pictured myself as a home - schooling parent, but if anything could convince me to change my tune, it's a science teacher opposing
solar farms because they might suck up too much energy from the sun.
Woodland, North Carolina, has a nice big chunk
of land near the highway that would be just perfect for putting in a new
solar farm, but it looks like that won't be happening
because several town residents objected to the plan, which some
of them said they opposed on the grounds that the
solar farm might «suck up all the energy from the sun.»
These properties make the cells ideal for things like windows or roofs, although they are probably less suitable for large - scale commercial applications, such as
solar farms,
because they need more area to produce the same amount
of electricity as more typical silicon - based
solar cells.
Because of the power
of the lake effect, the federal investigators described such
solar farms as «mega-traps» in their report.
When power needs to be taken out
of the flywheels -
because a cloud crosses in front
of the sun for example and a
solar farm stops producing power for a short while - the motor shifts to generator mode and converts kinetic to electrical energy, feeding it into the grid.
Southern Europe is still almost a no - go area for investors
because of retroactive policy changes, most recently those affecting
solar farms in Italy.
The potential
of wind and
solar energy is almost limitless,
because solar alone can provide 100 folds energy requirement
of the US, and wind can supply 40 x the energy required with a turbine on every
farm.
As a power «add on»,
solar «
farms» are useful but could never play anything more than a small part
of the grid system
because of their inflexible and unreliable nature.
On - shore wind and
solar farms remain the most popular means
of generating electricity; although no one would doubt that there remains a very vocal minority who remain opposed, many
because of vested interests in fossil fuels.
One easy target,
because of its good «visuals» and absence
of technical obscurity, would be to show non-performing wind turbines and weed - overgrown
solar - panel
farms.
Renewable energy advocates responded that the Breakthrough findings had to be wrong
because it takes so much longer to build a nuclear power plant — with much
of the protracted timeframes owing to construction delays — than, say, a
solar or wind
farm.
For example, Georgia Power will save Georgians several hundred million dollars
because of its Advanced
Solar Initiative, which buys power from rural solar farms across the s
Solar Initiative, which buys power from rural
solar farms across the s
solar farms across the state.
Malaria would be almost non existent, food would be more plentiful, fewer wind
farms /
solar / biofuel systems and we would be avoiding any AGW / Climate Indulgences
because people like Pachauri would be oiling railway engines or trying to get their porno books published [and hopefully failing miserably] and the likes
of Hansen, Mann, Jones on the dole queue........