Sentences with phrase «because part of the money»

The number of science jobs that will be created or saved is not yet clear, because part of the money will go to facilities and equipment.

Permanent offerings tend to be pricier than term because part of the money goes toward investments that the insurer makes on your behalf, which allows your policy to accrue cash value over time.

Not exact matches

If it sounds like Edwards still needed to apply FEC rules and limits, consider this: Scott Thomas, a former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission testified that he did not consider that the payments would have come under his agency's auspices — in part because they were not used directly for the campaign and did not free up any of Edwards» own money to be spent on the campaign.

But the company will benefit from the fund's decision to use XRP, in part because it controls large reserves of the currency (which may get a price boost from Arrington's announcement) and because the move may burnish Ripple's reputation as a money transfer platform.

A vote on the measure was delayed for hours after Democrats revolted against provisions to roll back part of the Dodd - Frank financial reform law and allow more big money political donations, while conservative Republicans objected because the measure did not block funds for Obama's immigration order.

The coat also allowed her to dress the part of a successful businesswoman and to project confidence in the cutthroat real estate industry, she tells Raz: «It was the smartest thing I could have done with the money because, in it, I felt powerful.»

I do it in part because I enjoy it, and in part because it saves me a tremendous amount of money.

There Friedberg observed that most farmers plant corn and soybeans because they make can make the most money through those crops, in large part because of their role as animal feed that supports humans» massive appetite for meat.

They are choosing to spend their money on seeing and doing, in part due to the rise of the «selfie generation,» and in part because of a genuine desire to see the world, he said.

I got rid of the individual mandate, the most — the biggest part and the most unpopular thing in Obamacare, which really repeals Obamacare, because it can't live without the mandate, because that's where a lot of the money came.

He says that part of the reason why Silicon Valley startups are gobbling up so much venture capital money is because many companies (especially unicorns) are choosing to stay private longer.

Most of the money went to the investors, yet Levine is still using VC funding for his current startups because it's «part of the game.»

It's a more complicated argument, but the flip side is that employees may not want to work full - time hours anyway because, under the economics of Obamacare, they can bring home the same amount of money working part time as they did full time — and still get benefits.

Rieder said money is flowing to stocks in part because there's not enough fixed income supply in the world, a function of central banks buying bonds and crowding out private investment.

PayPal is a preferred method of managing money for a lot of people, and that's because it makes everything really easy, for the most part.

To get residency realistically I got to earn 300 dollars in taxable income a week for a year, and in the meantime am allowed to go to school part time given the fact that I can pay for school with the money I have earned within the period I began to establish residency, so no outside cash because my bank accounts will be audited at the end of the year.

«Private digital tokens masquerading as currencies must not subvert this trust,» the BIS chief declared, in part because they could threaten to impact the «real value» of money.

In other words, George and Jill Guzzardo surrendered over a million dollars, not because of any egregious actions on their part, but rather because the Financial Matrix's boom / bust cycle, manufactured through the fraudulent Fractional Reserve Banking (FRB) and Central Banking Fiat money system was at work.

But in another sense it's a perfect fit, because another part of the bitcoin ethos — and one closely linked to its libertarianism — is a fondness for hard money.

The owner of 12 Tesla shares wrote this would minimize conflicts and brought up the acquisition of SolarCity Corp., a deal that was criticized in part because of Musk's links to the money - losing panel installer.

There is no - one vying for control of your business, no money to pay back and few personal relationships can be damaged because part of the agreements include a fulfillment reward which often satisfy the contributors.

It is only popular because it boosts some prices relative to other prices, thus temporarily benefiting some parts of the economy at the expense of other parts, and because the early users of the new money get to do the bulk of their spending / investing before prices rise.

For you and other financial institutions, dividends from investments are often part of your passive income stream because you don't really do any work for that money.

Plaintiffs are seeking the return of money given during the company's fundraiser, in part because they never received the digital tokens (known as Tezzies) that they believe their investments entitle them to.

Auto - defaulting a borrower, in that circumstance, is the illegal part, because it leaves the borrower with no choice but to pay back the crippling amount of money.

The whole discussion that we should have on here is on de-dollarization, but the conflict that's going on right now and part of the answer out of that is what's going to happen to cryptocurrencies because it's a way of getting around the controls that the central banks really have on the creation of money, the value of that money and the debasements of those currencies.

Spotify is part of a growing trend of private companies that can comfortably avoid selling shares to the public because they're more than capable of raising money on their own.

I am sure that part of the reason you are attacked and maligned is because you are right on the money and have touched a collective spiritual nerve.

If you were a business owner, you'd know that even though you may have held the money out of their paychecks and sent the premiums in, it's still your employees paying for it, because it's part of the compensation package you promised them.

A loan provides only part of the money that is needed to pay it back, because in addition to the principle, the borrower must pay interest.

And I don't think the couple withheld part of the money as a protest against injustice, because Peter told them that giving their money was not a requirement, even after they sold their property.

Re: idiot above claiming it is bigoted and dogmatic not to give to a believer charity, if it is ok for believers to argue that no money should be given to Planned Parenthood because it mind find its way to the part of PP that provides abortions (70 + % of which are for believers in th USA), it is ok for non-believers to argue that donations to a cult based charity might find their way to the cult's indoctrination division.

Because television is a capital - intensive industry, the matter of where the money is to come from is one of central importance, for it has been demonstrated that the source of the finances for religious programming plays a ma) or part in shaping the nature of the program.

And as they expand to other cities (which many are considering), they'll likely rely in part on capital from investors within the tech industry, if only because restaurants are already where a lot of tech money is going.

For me, Coquelin remains a vital part of our team even if we need a new CM, Coquelin still has a lot to offer us and because he doesn't cost us money doesn't take away his value...

Perhaps that's because they were such an integral part of the Premier League's early years, as it swelled from «the First Division, but louder and with a lion» into the world - spanning, money - vomiting monstrosity we know and wincingly tolerate today.

Yes, there is a great demand for success amongst the top clubs because the game at that level generates ludicrous amounts of money no small part of which comes from fans pockets.

And it is clear that the Arsenal boss paid so much money for Ozil and backed him against his critics because he thought he could be a fantastic part of the Gunners team.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

After the 2004 - 2005 lockout, I moved upstairs, in part because of pricing and in part out of protest to hand over less money to a business I thought was taking fans for granted.

These are very important questions because when things go wrong on the field of play and we (fans and pundits) formulate our opinions — we do so through the prism of what we see on the field of play — the performance of the players and the manager — and largely ignore the role and activities of the money making people who behind the scenes play a huge part in determining what happens on the pitch.

yes, Sanchez is Good but he is not showing up for the Games, he is probably first choice becoz we bought for a lot of money and just becoz he played for Barcelona, sometimes it makes me realise why Barcelona parted ways with him because of his selfishness, we don't play that type of Football - we pass the ball and Campbell does that

He recently took part in a bit of Eurotrash sport — an ergometer contest broadcast on Austrian TV — because of the generous appearance money.

but thats because of wenger too, he is part of the problem since he always have privilege money than glory... besides his average decitions on the field..

(3) this team is rotting from the inside out and it's going to take some unprecedented moves on the part of this board and the fans to facilitate the necessary changes... this club must rid itself of it's absentee billionaire landlord before we become just another sporting wasteland in this man's collection of flailing clubs... when this is done it will expose just what exactly has been going on behind the scenes and I'm afraid of what will be uncovered because if Wenger's business model is as antiquated as his football philosophy it could look an awful lot like and old Monty Python sketch in the backroom... we need to replace the owner with someone who actually cares about this club and isn't afraid to wear their emotions on his or her sleeves or spend their own money to achieve greatness... this new owner needs to find someone who represents the same sort of cutting edge that Wenger represented in his early years then pair that individual with someone who knows how to conduct transfers in the modern era... then and only then will we find a way to escape the malaise that has permeated our once storied club for way too many years

Rambling... what I'm trying to say is, if even correct - Max (xx) seems like a Conor fan trying to find a rationalization, I think it's because figuring out what's beyond the zero - possibility is part of understanding where I'm truly at with the whole thing, beyond adject disappointment in the fight game for, yet again, mortgaging its future for the most money possible today.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Of course, that sort of thing hasn't stopped WWE before, because part - timers tend to be big money, and that's often the tiebreaker for decision makinOf course, that sort of thing hasn't stopped WWE before, because part - timers tend to be big money, and that's often the tiebreaker for decision makinof thing hasn't stopped WWE before, because part - timers tend to be big money, and that's often the tiebreaker for decision making.

Part of me thinks that AFC have put transfers on hold until they can raise more funds and go back with one last try for Lemar, I know it looks dead in the water because Monaco have raised their asking price but it might be the fact we do not have that money and without that money it is dead... but we get the money and it could be on again.

Despite that, the line has moved towards the Bengals, in large part because of the money that has come in on Cincy at -3.