Sentences with phrase «because point earnings»

The reason they use the term «around» is because point earnings vary depending on the program you choose.

Not exact matches

On what the bull market needs to stay alive: «I think you need a catalyst because valuations are at the point now where, in my opinion, where it's going to be difficult to get sustainable earnings growth without capital spending,» said Trennert.

Investors have been buying equities because of strong economic data and earnings growth, according to Phipps, who pointed out they have been mostly ignoring political turmoil, including the specter of nuclear war between the United States and North Korea and the investigation of potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Because of the widespread dilution, Research Affiliates reckons that since 1871, EPS has risen around 1.5 % a year in real terms, lagging total earnings by around 2 points.

Siegel thinks that earnings per share can grow about half a point faster than nominal GDP — in the 5 % range including inflation — chiefly because of big gains in the technology sector.

Building a position in the stock before its obvious breakout point is tricky because there is no guarantee the stock will gap higher after earnings.

Because instead of redeeming what you earn on the Chase Freedom Unlimited ® for cash, you can transfer your earnings to Ultimate Reward ® points and use Chase's proprietary rewards system.

If Marcie's # 225 earnings are derived from being on or near the minimum wage, then there is a double hit for her because she also can not salary sacrifice to save 12 per cent National Insurance, if such an arrangement would take her pay below the level of the applicable minimum wage rate (# 7.83 per hour in 2018/19 for those aged 25 and over).3 Anne Fairpo said: «One of the concerns about allowing the lowest earners to sacrifice salary has been the risk of their pay dropping below the point at which entitlement to contributory benefits is triggered (the Lower Earnings Limit - # 116 per week in 2earnings are derived from being on or near the minimum wage, then there is a double hit for her because she also can not salary sacrifice to save 12 per cent National Insurance, if such an arrangement would take her pay below the level of the applicable minimum wage rate (# 7.83 per hour in 2018/19 for those aged 25 and over).3 Anne Fairpo said: «One of the concerns about allowing the lowest earners to sacrifice salary has been the risk of their pay dropping below the point at which entitlement to contributory benefits is triggered (the Lower Earnings Limit - # 116 per week in 2Earnings Limit - # 116 per week in 2018/19).

I posted this somewhere else but I wanted to post here because I think it's important to point out that the earnings aren't the most important part of this report.

At this particular point in time, all of my single - author titles but one (just released with about 370 copies sold in Amazon US store) would not appear in any Author Earnings report because they are on no bestseller lists.

All card earnings count, but because this is year one you won't earn the 6,000 anniversary bonus points.

The reason I did not get into FCF (or rather owner earnings) is because I wanted to keep it simple to make a point that Asian paints was undervalued at a P / E of 25 and also because the owner earnings of Asian Paints exceed reported earnings, so my computations were not aggressive, in my view.

(Investors can also take a more relaxed approach because the three earnings - based portfolios still outperformed the index by more than four percentage points per year when they were rebalanced annually instead of monthly.)

However, the point is that your benefits aren't necessarily lost because of the earnings test — just delayed.

As a final point, it's important to mention that if your benefits are reduced because of the earnings test, they don't exactly disappear.

The earnings levels where percentages change are called bend points because a graph of the benefits would have a bend in the line at those points.

Because the funds in your Roth IRA have come from your contributions, and not from tax subsidized earnings, you can tap your contributions (but not your earnings) tax - free and penalty - free at any point you wish to do so.

As with most cyclicals, its earnings multiple will appear the highest when results are at their lowest point because investors are anticipating higher earnings in the future.

Look, we KNOW forward earnings estimates are going to be wrong at major inflection points because analysts generally just extrapolate the existing trend.

If we assume that companies return their 7 % earnings and dividend yield (perhaps optimistic) and we also assume that multiples don't expand further (because they're so historically high) then 7 % is a safe starting point.

The popular price - to - forward operating earnings measure does not point to overvaluation, but is flawed because forward operating earnings are systematically too optimistic.

A retailer at 13 times earnings is often a bad use of your research time, because it's unlikely to have absurdly high market power (due to the industry it's in) and it's unlikely to be absurdly cheap (13 times earnings is a pretty ho - hum price that most stocks hit at some point in their history as a public company).

Point # 1 is simply wrong, because companies that reinvest earnings and growing for a long time are essentially creating tax - free gains for you, which is even better than tax - deferred gains.

But the two main things to point out on penny stocks is this: 1) Most people investing in penny stocks lose a lot of money, because the stocks seem cheap, but they have little in assets or earnings relative to their price.

Hussman's point is that the Fed model doesn't work because netting out the risk - free rate destroys the information in the other portion of the model e.g. the raw earnings yield, unadjusted for 10 - year Treasury yields, more closely predicts the actual returns of the market.

Because the economic environment and news is often bad at this point, investors tend to be cautious and initially invest in companies with good earnings and cash reserves.

«There is no point asking about a company's earnings outlook because if we are investing for the long term, then short - term earnings never affect our intrinsic value calculation.

We highly recommend signing up for multiple Ultimate Rewards cards — not just to earn the sign - up bonuses — but because you can maximize your rewards earnings by rotating cards to earn the most points possible on each category of purchase.

All card earnings count, but because this is year one you won't earn the 6,000 anniversary bonus points.

However, the issue of whether or not you should split up your spending on different programs is more difficult because the earnings are usually far less and the risk for leaving points stranded is much higher.

Because the censuses do not describe individuals» careers or the details of where they work, they can provide only a limited understanding of earnings differences, pointing to the need for further research.

Sir this is sanjay form Mysore (Karnataka) working as driver, i have one year old son, can you please recommend which plan is better for my son for his education etc, whatever you suggest i will follow you, because i ask some insurance advisor they will suggest from their beneficial point of view, since my earnings is average, so whatever you suggest i will follow, because i do nt want my son to be driver like me, please suggest me