Sentences with phrase «because precise measures»

Legal experts, speaking on a not - for - attribution basis because precise measures have not been announced, said one possibility is the government might change the Competition Act to say that «abuse of a dominant position» would include «exploitative pricing» or, in effect, charging too much.

Not exact matches

I like to measure things in metrics because I think it is more precise so this is a must for me, especially when I am baking.

The San Francisco Cooking School prefers to measure quantities in grams, because it is a precise system of measurement for bakers.

And because NASCAR used tempates to measure the cars, which were not as precise and allowed crew chiefs to play within the margins of the rulebook and take advantage of the gray areas.

Gavin Rowell of the University of Adelaide in Australia says DAMPE should be able to shed some light on this because it is better at measuring the precise energy of those gamma rays, which could help test different explanations.

Fainter objects had been rejected because the color estimates were less precise; now they were objectively ranked in descending order by the fact that a star, when that faint, could end up having the measured colors of a quasar.

But director Anton Corbijn (he made the Joy Division movie Control) keeps you on board for that agenda because he sells it all cold, measured, cautious, precise, methodical and certain of its own stony - end demise from start to finish.

We have gotten into the business of measuring school performance with precise testing numbers because it's something we know how to measure.

Unfortunately, many manufacturers are quite sloppy with the Intensity Scale on their displays because it has to be set and measured logarithmically (to a precise mathematical power - law).

During the normal and healthy conduct of monetary policy, the measured rate of inflation often deviates from official targets within a range of a percentage point or two because of the challenges of defining, measuring, and hitting a precise inflation target over a short - term period.

Because the definition of the word states a concept or an idea rather than a precise measure or methodology, it is up to a person's interpretation to say whether or not a dog or a breeder is overbreeding.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

First, this is possible because helioseismic data provide the most precise measure ever of the solar cycle, which ultimately yields more profound physical limits on past irradiance variations.

Satellite measurements might be «close enough for many applications», but even warmists scientists admit they can't actually measure the alleged imbalance because the instruments aren't precise and accurate enough.

First we should reiterate that our measure of poverty may not be precise, most notably because GUS collects income information using just one question rather than as part of a detailed exercise.

These more precise measures will allow much more comprehensive price comparison, because the homes you are comparing will probably have greater similarity and therefore will indicate truer current pricing information.