In its most recent environmental review, the State Department is repeating its argument that the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will have limited impact on greenhouse gas emissions
because rail transport is an economically feasible alternative.
Not exact matches
McKenna also told Clinton that Canada is tripling the amount of oil that's
transported by
rail because of a lack of pipelines.
Crude - by -
rail shipments are expected to ramp up in the second half of this year and into the first half of next year to «very material volumes of oil,» Pourbaix said, adding price discounts will improve but will likely remain higher than usual
because rail costs more than pipeline
transport.
However, I would have been obliged to resign from the commission at this point anyway
because of the
transport secretary's indefensible decision to bail out the Stagecoach / Virgin East Coast
rail franchise.
Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin announced this afternoon that the UK Government is going to delay or cut back a number of modernisation projects planned for Network
Rail because rising costs and missed targets make the # 38.5 bn plan untenable.
The case for HS2 has now descended into nothing but rhetoric with everything being chucked at the idea that it must be a good idea,
because those three words «high speed
rail» sound so much like they should be a good idea, or at least that's what Cameron thought when he picked up the time - bomb Lord Adonis left ticking in the Department for
Transport.
Yesterday the Office of
Rail Regulator watchdog ruled that Network
Rail was in breach of its licence
because of «poor performance and high levels of delays», prompting shadow
transport secretary Maria Eagle to call for its corporate governance structure to be reformed.
But
transporting oil from western Canada by pipeline is less expensive than shipping by
rail, which requires specialized cars and / or specialized handling
because of the very high viscosity of oil sands oil.
Further, the pipeline would help the environment,
because moving oil by pipeline produces 42 percent fewer emissions than
transporting oil by
rail, which is how the oil is being
transported in lieu of the new pipeline.
Ethanol is currently
transported mainly by tanker truck or
rail cars
because it can not be shipped in existing gasoline pipelines.
And that the results may have been more disastrous
because the
rail and oil companies are not required to invest in the safest
transport car technology available is wrong.
Stopping the Keystone XL pipeline is important not just
because it will help stop future leaks that, judging from the track record of TransCanada's first pipeline, Keystone 1, as highlighted above, will be much larger than the spills we've seen from
rail transport, but it also prevents a massive piece of essentially permanent fossil fuel infrastructure from being established that will no doubt push global warming past the point of no return, as the «terrifying math of global warming» makes startlingly clear.