The researchers say it's possibly
because religious people have less fear of death.
I think it might be
because religious people are taught that sin has consequences (which it does), but then we feel that it is OUR job to make sinners suffer the consequences, and so we withhold forgiveness until we see them suffer.
It matters
because religious people (at least Abrahamic religions) are rarely content to believe whatever they believe in private.
But it is essential to deal with it at some length, first, because some evangelicals have made this charge; second, because the media have spread the charge far and wide; and third,
because some religious people discussing AIDS seem to want to ignore the biblical teaching that there is a moral order in the universe and that wrong choices have consequences.
also research the defintion of an extra-terristrial aka an alien, and the defintion of magic
because religious people believe in both of those things due to their belief in any god.
We can not get along
because the religious people want to write the guidelines of their fairy tale into our laws.
Just
because religious people are also crazy is no reason to burn down their churches.
oh yeah
because religious people NEVER cry about anything.
The reason that it's hard to convince some people that there is an almighty is
because we religious people have created the almighty in our own image — in images of forms that we can see, feel, taste, touch, imagine etc. and using properties of time, matter or space that do not actually exist!
Then I understood religion and atheism are alike
because religious people when they can't answer something they say it's God's wishes and they followers accept it.
Tell me, if the school charged the actual market value for the use of this space and the use of equipment, etc. and if that market value actually reflected the cost to the public, then the issue might become clearer to
you because these religious people would scream at having to pay full price and the cost of any damages they may inflict upon the public property they are using illegally.
You can argue that there are no religious people
because every religious person has their own definition of the word.
Because each religious person «feels» his religion is the true one and he «feels» he needs to share it (force it) on anyone within ear shot (and then some).
Not exact matches
It is the policy of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to provide equal opportunity in employment throughout the corporation for all qualified applicants and employees without discrimination against any
person because of a
person's race, color, religion (including
religious dress and grooming practices), sex / gender (including pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions and breast feeding), national origin, ancestry, gender identity, gender expression, legally - protected medical condition, physical or mental disability, age, military or veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information or any other basis protected by applicable law.
Indeed, the justices should hold that Hobby Lobby does not have
religious rights precisely
because the corporation is a legal
person.
More
religious claptrap, read some history and find out that santorums lot (the catholic church) executed whole societies in south America simply
because those poor ignorant
people had a different religion.
Dawkins argues that while there appear to be plenty of individuals that would place themselves as «1» due to the strictness of
religious doctrine against doubt, most atheists do not consider themselves «7»
because atheism arises from a lack of evidence and evidence can always change a thinking
person's mind.
First,
people often kill other human beings
because they believe that the creator of the universe wants them to do it... Second, far greater numbers of
people fall into conflict with one another
because they define their moral com.munity on the basis of their
religious affiliation...»
The reason is
because there is no end to certain
religious people telling scientists that they are wrong just
because some theory or law goes against that
person's religion.
I have no problem with any other religion (I'm not
religious myself)
because they, on a whole, promote positive actions amongst their
people.
These types of ra nts lead down the path of
religious per secution and have been the same kinds of words during horrible religiously motivated at roci ties — ki ll ing of
people because their flavor of Christian faith didn't meet the standard of some other self - right eous mob.
It is
because we do not harass
people, evangelize, and distribute
religious videos AT WORK.
When atheists begin a debate with a
religious person, it's
because the atheists are bullies who have no respect for the beliefs of others.
But of course and
religious quotings you consider as poison
because you want to be deafening and blinding your self from recognizing the existence of GOD the Creator of the universe...!?! Where ever you head you will find GOD and GOD loving
people so get used to it... You are running and running away but you can't run away from your self...!
Many are the descendants of
people who fled Europe
because of
religious persecution by state churches.
You atheists are doing it
because you have nothing to do in this world except for bullying the
religious people.
People who are
religious or spiritual are so
because it feels good not
because it makes sense.
I haven't blogged much today on things
religious because I've been so so busy meeting with
people: heart - attacks, grievers, and others in their own particular trials.
And when they ask questions you can not answer
because you do not know, just revert to the
religious person's favorite default, «It is part of god's plan.
Religion teaches
people THAT crap about the universe creator which is TOTALLY NOT what either the 10 commandments were about OR what they are for or all about and I can 100 percent prove it so
religious people HATE me
because... by God I do the 10 commmandment and since I do the 10 commandment and work so hard to always do the 10 commandment... YOUR burning in hell cause you broke one and SINNED... its is ridiculas... what religion HAS done regarding what God gave Moses... in the old testement.
Most
people in this country are ashamed to express their faith
because it is only a
religious duty to them and not a real spiritual relationship with the only true and living God!!!
@EvolvedDNA, Every majority's
religious body's leaders had supreme authority in most civilizations
because people were not educated, and religion was tied to the nation or the tribe.
You can't «believe in» God
because you don't know for sure whether God exist (by most
religious people's own admission, I think, though I coud be wrong, but either way its a fact that the existence of God has not been proven).
They have no friends and they just attack
religious people (particularly Christians)
because they are afraid of attacking Muslims and Jews.
This is exactly why
religious people are having difficulties coming to terms that there is no God — they construct an «evidence» for God
because they simply desire to do so; they do so when it is not supported by logic and / or despite logic.
Some athiests are just as bad as the fundimentalists...
because they «know» I being and agnostic, however, take issue with anyone who says that
people who are not
religious do not think... in fact, it has been found that statistically, athiests and agnostics know the bible better than christians.
People don't want
religious messages on the side of buses
because then they might be reminded while their walking down the street that there's a God, there's a Creator out there.
So, if you have actually read a bible and have a better argument for me than «I want proof» (
because there is none, it's a
religious BELIEF) or that Christians judge
people or hate
people (
because as a TRUE Christian you must not judge & you must love thy neighbor) then I'm all for it!
It's called deconstruction and the GOP is leading the way
because, as this nation knows all too well, the
religious right of America hates to pay a fair living wage to workers, they prefer to enslave
people to serve them.
Yes, lets just dig at
peoples final moments
because it doesn't strike some ideal
religious vision.
Probably confuses
people because «Christian» or «
religious» aren't in the name of the blog.
the «logic» of a
religious person: X: I think
people who are dying should talk about god,
because god is totally awesome!
But a
religious person needs him as much as the secular
person,
because the modern Protestant or Catholic or Jew has plenty of trouble hearing God's voice.
When I say blindly it is
because I know many, many, many
religious people that believe what they believe
because someone told them to, not
because they have studied the material and come to their own conclusions as you have.
The death penalty should be abolished not for
religious reasons (also
religious people seem to approve of the dath penalty — which to me makes no sense) but
because every
person who is killed is one less set of DNA to be passed on to succeeding generations, and who knows what those wasted genes could mean for the future of the species?
So just
because one atheist chooses to be a bigot and group all Christians or
religious people in general together don't do the same cause your own god said Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Right now, you've got a
Religious Right in America that's losing its own young
people because its leaders HATE so much whoever opposes them.
Rather, men or women join
religious life
because they have perceived the call from One who transcends all earthly things to serve him, and through him, his
people.
No amount of evidence will convince
religious people to change their views
because they are based on faith not logic.
As I'm writing this, I can see all the
religious people saying all atheists should be fired
because they bring the devil into the place of work... so I feel the need to provide the caveat: conflict with their objectives in a way that is sanely and reasonably shown.