Sentences with phrase «because sea level data»

Josh Willis explanation that extra warming was going down in the deep ocean is unsupportable because sea level data are essentialy coherent with ARGO ocean temperature: no temperature increase for ARGO (that is the most extensive way we are measuring ocean temperature), no sea level increase.

This was evident because the sea level data has been revised not once, but twice this year.

Not exact matches

Scientists use sea level as a means to calculate ocean circulation because satellites circle Earth daily, acquiring sea level data frequently and accurately.

And that is a very bad thing, because paleoclimate data tells us that the Pliocene regime 5 mil years ago had 15 meter higher sea level.

TK @ 85: Can anyone please explain to me what I'm missing because looking at satellite data from university of Colorado (http://sealevel.colorado.edu/) its obvious that the annual sea level rise is contained at 3.3 mm / year.

Can anyone please explain to me what I'm missing because looking at satellite data from university of Colorado (http://sealevel.colorado.edu/) its obvious that the annual sea level rise is contained at 3.3 mm / year.

But — just because the data don't follow a parabola, doesn't mean that sea level hasn't accelerated.

Whatever the true linear increasing rate of the present global sea level rise is, a look on the data after subtracting a linear function of +3.2 mm per year from the Colorado sea level data shows a remarkable oscillation of about ~ 6.15 periods per year, because this is twice the synodic frequency of Mercury, Earth and Jupiter, with the frequencies of Mercury (4.15204 y ^ -1), Earth (0.9998 y ^ -1) and Jupiter (0.084317 y ^ -1): F = 2 * (4.15204 — 0.99998 — 0.

NEW evidence has cast doubt on claims that the world's ice - caps are melting, it emerged last night. Satellite data shows that concerns over the levels of sea ice may have been premature. It was feared that the polar caps were vanishing because of the effects of global warming. But figures from the respected US National -LSB-...]

Satellite Data Show No Acceleration In Sea Level Rise Over Past 25 Years Image: NASA Earth Observatory (public domain) Dr. Sebastian Lüning and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt today here are asking how sea level rise is doing because as have not heard much about it lateSea Level Rise Over Past 25 Years Image: NASA Earth Observatory (public domain) Dr. Sebastian Lüning and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt today here are asking how sea level rise is doing because as have not heard much about it laLevel Rise Over Past 25 Years Image: NASA Earth Observatory (public domain) Dr. Sebastian Lüning and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt today here are asking how sea level rise is doing because as have not heard much about it latesea level rise is doing because as have not heard much about it lalevel rise is doing because as have not heard much about it lately.

A former senior researcher in the department, Doug Lord, said yesterday two papers he co-authored with colleagues and was due to present at conferences were suppressed because they suggested sea - levels on the east coast are rising at only one 10th of the rate estimated by the federal government, based on data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Paleoclimate data are not as helpful for defining the likely rate of sea level rise in coming decades, because there is no known case of growth of a positive (warming) climate forcing as rapid as the anthropogenic change.

The Holsteinian sea level is more difficult to reconstruct from geological data because of its age, and there has been a long - standing controversy concerning a substantial body of geological shoreline evidence for a +20 m Late Holsteinian sea level that Hearty and co-workers have found on numerous sites [54,55](numerous pros and cons are contained in the references provided in our present paragraph).

The villains [in Crichton's book] are frustrated because the data do not prove that global warming is causing rising sea levels This is a particularly strange example for Will (and Crichton) to choose, since even the most ardent «skeptics» do not question that sea levels are rising, and that this is almost all due to the warming of the planet.

Satellite technology was introduced to provide more objective measurement of the sea level rise because properly adjusted tide gauge data was not fitting Alarmists» claims.

However, detecting acceleration is difficult because of (i) interannual variability in GMSL largely driven by changes in terrestrial water storage (TWS)(7 ⇓ — 9), (ii) decadal variability in TWS (10), thermosteric sea level, and ice sheet mass loss (11) that might masquerade as a long - term acceleration over a 25 - y record, (iii) episodic variability driven by large volcanic eruptions (12), and (iv) errors in the altimeter data, in particular, potential drifts in the instruments over time (13).