Sentences with phrase «because such betting»

This is the bookmaker's dream, because such betting secures a lot of winnings for the bookies.

Not exact matches

In fact, cutting it out too often is a bad idea, because without it you're missing some of the key fat - fighting nutrients such as choline.If you're counting calories, your best bet is to eat one yolk for every 2 to 3 eggs you consume.

Value investors like Buffett will tell you that such stocks are a better bet over the long term because they provide better returns with less risk.

Because the financial markets have been so volatile these last few years and may continue to give investors a bumpy ride, Kaplan says it pays for investors to stay liquid and to diversify their holdings through vehicles such as mutual funds and ETFs (exchange - traded funds) rather than make big bets on individual securities.

Such complexity exists because this two - player version of poker allows for unrestricted bet sizes.

«Because the outcomes of games in daily fantasy sports leagues depends partially on chance, an individual's payment of a fee to participate in such activities is a bet,» Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote in a nine - page Jan. 19 decision.

On the other hand, it's very difficult intrinsically to value such stocks because they are bets on the future.

As such, Bitcoin traders have been betting on the cryptocurrency market believing it can provide the most stable currency in the future, precisely because it is not tied to any individual country and thus is not affected by socio - political events.

I bet mommy gave you two whole dollars this week because you're such an adult.

Because I'm such a mood food gal and I bet a lot of other folks are, too.

Show some grit and steel in games, even when we lose I bet you fans wouldn't be so mad because of such performance.

Ever since Wenger said after the West Brom debacle that he had made his mind up but hadn't told anybody his decision, I have been keeping an eye on the bookies to see if there is any big movements in the «Wenger to be the Arsenal manager next season» market, simply because there is no such thing as a secret nowadays, and if the Boss has made his mind up you can bet your bottom dollar that someone else knows what it is and will tip off his mates on the quiet...

I would prefer a player who gives Coq strong competition like Krychowiak.But if Wenger wont sign any DM then i would like him to try out Isaac Hayden.I have faith in him and i believe even at such a young age he is better than Flamini at defending and attacking.This guy would be a star one day its only injuries that are halting the rate of his progress.However i would have preferred Wenger signed someone more experienced like Krychowiak to give COQ competition.However if he does nt sign anyone Isaac Hayden will be my best bet because he is solid.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

For the first time in league history no team will play four - in - fives this season, which stinks because fading such teams was a profitable betting strategy.

And these same women who are willing to bet the lives and health of their babies against such enormous odds, then refuse to allow those children to be vaccinated because of the «risk of autism» (I know there is no risk and that theory is utter bunk, I'm just discussing their thinking on the subject).

Although most recognize that taking such a bet makes sense, people often choose not to because the potential pain of losing often outweighs the pleasure of winning.

Generally speaking, sports that don't require long periods of strenuous physical effort, such as volleyball or baseball, are a safe bet for asthma sufferers, because they allow you to catch your breath while the ball isn't in play.

A pinup witch is an excellent option if you're on such a strict budget that you don't want to spend out anything at all to make your costume, because I bet you have enough black pieces in your wardrobe to put something together, and also a great option for a last minute costume you weren't prepared to need.

This year, I bet you it will be the same case, because I'm such a procrastinator... but you don't have to be.

«The Shape of Things» marks the last good film LaBute has made (for whatever reason he moves on to goofy Hollywood thrillers like «The Wicker Man» and «Lakeview Terrace» and the embarrassing «Death at a Funeral» remake - one would think those films were from a totally different human all together; my bet is he became a drug addict because no one looses such talent so quickly) but this wonderful, tricky and rewarding series of films is well worth your serious time and attention.

It's almost like Weitz and Co. thought this movie would be a safe bet because it was using such strong and successful parts of The Bicycle Thief, that it would work with almost if not the same effect De Sica's film had in 1948.

All too often, I've seen people feel artificially over-confident about their situation (such that they formulate big spending and big budget plans, or proceed to make high risk bets) all because their confidence is boosted by a handful of well - performing stocks or the sudden found wealth generated in appreciating property values.

Because of their diversity, more mutual funds are considered a safer bet than individual stocks, as they are spread out in such a way that poor performance in one area of the market will not necessarily make that much of an impact on the overall fund.

The move took major cojones because with such a large percentage on the short side, around 20 percent, in the hands of one person, those on the other side of the trade — who are betting the stock will go up — can try to orchestrate the aforementioned «short squeeze,» by buying up shares.

We can't tell from this data whether paying the minimum amount is the reason people are struggling or whether they pay the minimum because they are struggling, but it seems a good bet from our data that paying the minimum amount is somehow connected to a person's financial situation as well as their knowledge — or lack of knowledge — about the drawbacks of paying such a tiny amount each month.

I'd bet you'd have never guess that Horsetail falls is named as such because it resembles the flowing tail of a horse?

Normal, non-ideology-based scientists question the veracity of the CRU — IPCC flavoured results just because the JBM camaraderie - based group did refuse to honour such requests and people ask the following question: why, if both the empirical results — the raw data (including the nitty - gritty details of the temperature measurements) AND the theoretical model - based machinery are above board and the overall climatological picture of a man (n)- made warming is pretty much a safe bet, why then would some AGW researchers like the JBM gang refuse to accept that they, too, have got to conform to normal scientific procedure and release the raw data and the details of the theoretical machinery used to understand those data?

I can quote you some examples of climate science data analytics that were published in non-related climate journals, such as computing, data - mining, etc,... If those papers were to submit to a climate related journal, I bet that reviewers from those journals (would have no clue to the methods / algorithms being used in those papers because those methods / algorithms are still unknown to climate scientists).

The control panel, «Networking and Sharing Center» seems like our best bet because it's such a simple thing.