Sentences with phrase «because taking the case to trial»

Not exact matches

And please, let us do proper investigation so that when we take a case to court, we would have successfully prosecuted the individual and not all the needless energy on bail and media trial because if the case is not strong and the accused is set free, people will turn round to blame judges for corruption.

I have together with my officials here taken a hard look at the docket and we have come to the decision that there are aspects of the matter that require further investigations, and to be able to do that, then we need to discontinue because we can not reopen investigations when the case is on trial, so what has necessitated the withdrawal by the entering of a nolle prosequoi is to enable us conduct further investigations into aspects of the matter.»

More important is Hutton's overstatement of the case for HRT: the long - term benefits of HRT are still not clear because the women who began taking HRT twenty or thirty years ago were probably healthier to begin with, and no one has set up a long - term randomised controlled trial.

Whitehead and the other researchers said that in the case of dengue, the testing was warranted because they knew that the vaccine appeared to be effective at preventing dengue 1, 3 and 4 viruses through previous testing but needed to learn more about its impact on dengue 2 before proceeding to larger trials that could take three to 10 years and cost tens of millions of dollars.

In this case, the trial judge did not take the statutory deductible into consideration in awarding costs of $ 409,098.48 to the Plaintiff because it would be «unfair».

Because the case is set for trial in Vancouver, I am of the view that it is in the interests of justice in this case to order that the independent medical examination take place here.

Evander Holyfield is the spokesperson for our firm because we fight for our clients until they receive a fair settlement, or we take the case to trial.

There have been situations in which Ontario judges have halted cases involving serious criminal charges because they have taken too long to get to trial, however, this is not always the case.

Getting to trial can take years in some cases because of the backlog of civil cases.

Experienced trial attorneys, however, will not recommend a victim to take less simply because they are afraid to try the case.

Insurance companies quickly recognize attorneys that do not try cases and will keep settlement offers unreasonably low knowing that such attorneys will ultimately settle for less because they either do not want to, or can not, take a case to trial.

Because of how the principle of judicial independence is interpreted by courts, the original trial judge in this case could not be asked why it had taken 9 months to reach a verdict, and could not be questioned whether the delay was due to the complexity of the case, the judge's workload, or other personal reasons, such as illness.

We win difficult cases because our attorneys have the training and background to thoroughly understand complex technical issues, the courtroom skills to take cases to trial — if necessary, and a client - focused approach to developing strategies and budgets to achieve every client's unique goals.

Our spokesperson is Evander Holyfield because we do not stop fighting on behalf of our clients until we reach a fair settlement or take the case to trial.

If you have been involved in a civil dispute, and taken your case to trial, only to get an unfavorable result because the judge made an error, you want an experienced lawyer to help you assess and protect your rights.

Because of the complex nature of medical malpractice cases, they take longer to get to trial than most people would care to wait.

Alan does not just settle a case because he won't take the case to trial.

Because if a case goes to trial and AbbVie takes a hit, it is a stain on this new company... and the price of settlements is going to keep going up.

If you don't have a major injury you may have difficulty finding an attorney to take your case because the cost of going to trial might otherwise exceed what you can recover.

Guyle Clark, co-chair on the trial team explains, «We took Ryan's case to trial because we did not feel that ICBC was adequately willing to compensate Ryan for his future loss of earning capacity.»

We will fight for our clients because we are known as a firm that has taken so many cases to trial, we now find that in most cases our clients receive fair offers which avoid the need for a trial.

We recommend hiring an established and prominent Illinois medical malpractice lawyer because they typically have the financial resources to take a medical malpractice case to trial, and are generally respected by insurance companies.

These experts are crucial in building a case that is formidable — a case that the insurance company will look at and not want to take to trial because they are afraid of it.

Taking a case completely to trial is often done in only the most egregious accident cases because it gives a sympathetic jury an opportunity to award punitive damages along with compensatory claims, especially when an accident involved a drunk driver or speeding driver or a commercial vehicle.

The insurance companies know that we will take your case to trial when necessary, and this is important to you because you want your attorneys to have a reputation that there is «bite behind our bark.»

Because we only take on cases that we are willing to take to trial, we prepare your claims to the full extent of the law.

Because of cost considerations, the stores rarely take these cases to trial if the letters go unheeded, but it is quite common for them to turn the matters over to debt collectors.

Because we are a firm of trial attorneys with a diverse range of trial experience, our opponents in securities and corporate governance cases know that we can and will take them to trial if necessary.

Because we are not afraid to take a case to trial, and because we have been so successful trying cases before juries, we are able to negotiate advantageously on behalf of our cBecause we are not afraid to take a case to trial, and because we have been so successful trying cases before juries, we are able to negotiate advantageously on behalf of our cbecause we have been so successful trying cases before juries, we are able to negotiate advantageously on behalf of our clients.

The original trial judge said that that previous case, in which the Crown took a case against Wallace Duncan Smith, meant «that the Crown Court had jurisdiction to try the appellants for their conduct because a substantial measure of the activities constituting the crime took place in England,» according to the Court of Appeal.

As Justice McEwan noted (paras. 19 - 20), it was a ten - day trial «largely a result of the thorough approach the defendant took to the case,» even though «[c] ompetent counsel might have cut the time in half, because counsel generally know how much evidence is enough.»)

Because we know that deciding whether to settle a personal injury lawsuit out of court over taking the case to trial is a major decision that should not be made lightly.

The idea that a judge, presented with a case that has taken years to investigate, has involved millions of pounds of investment, thousands of documents and hundreds of witnesses, will suddenly on day one of the trial halt proceedings because of prejudicial reporting is wholly unrealistic.

That proportion is no accident: patent litigants flock to Texas because the court has put in place a host of procedures that make it difficult for defendants to terminate meritless cases early, while also speeding up the time it takes for cases to go to trial.