Sentences with phrase «because walcot»

So because walcot scored two against a mediocre san marino he is WC and like a «new signing»?..

So just because Walcot shows some flashes of brilliance in back to back preseason friendlies Wenger all of a sudden believes he is ready to be our top striker competing with Giroud?

Not exact matches

He is not what we need, we have started with Alexis and Walcot at the beginning of the season, they did very well both scoring goals but suddenly, we changed the lineup because OG scored goals when brought in as substitute.

«Wenger is giving the striker the self confidence and belief that should help him to start banging more goals in himself» i highly doubt that makes one a goal scorer... otherwise why bring about this question after welbeck has been involved in two goals??? To me walcot is a better option because of his finishing, smart runs, game reading, delivering during big games, good final touch and making it easier for the right back since he keeps defenders in deep in their half therefore, no need for him to be defensive.

Would you drop, Ozil yes, Giroud yes Mertisaker yes Gibbs yes because we have replacements for those positions at this time.So who comes in Gabriel Monreal Rosicky Walcot.

But who am I kidding Walcot and Giroud are starting this game because always tries to prve a point using the same set of players every game.

because no competition for spot, if you have two good players in one position, d one playing will b fully awaere that if he doesn't perform to expectation, there is another good guy waiting to topple him, hence d one playing is contious of DAT, then why allow contracts to linger on, get rid of unproductive players who ate on free salaries, walcot, iwobi, mattasarka, and buy players you can use, end carzola contract and channel d money elsewhere, too many leakages in d system, y waisting money for noting, all these is asene fault, he is the coach.

i understand why wenger opted for gibbons instead because defending doesn't interest walcot..

Ox, Giroud, gibbs will find sure buyers because they are marketable, Walcot is a liability... i want Ox to stay, this guy has this talent...

i don't see any sense in the article apart from promoting england players by the way people on here praise the ox but none realises that his final product ends in the hands of the defenders after exciting us with he runs in to defenders, i don't mean to say he's bad but i'd prefer him in the middle because there he makes runs and shoot on sight other than in the wings where he hardly create a thing... put campbell, Sanchez and walcot in the wings.

Ramsey for Fu — k sake is not a RW, only his friends and family are happy to see him play there but any true Arsenal fans would prefer Welbek or Walcot there because they are true RW.Those who say he is more a threat for goal than the two others are deluded.

Anytime Walcot has the ball you see the defender coming at him because they know he can not dribble to save his life.

We were looking a great team untill we lost that Walcot and Bellerin... look how we've been struggling since we missd those playrs and adding to Ramsey... those three playrs shud return as quick as possible our opponents are attacking us from the ryt wing because both Campbel and Debuchy dnt offr what Bellerin and Walcot offerd... it can get worse if they dnt return soon... without them we cudnt hv blown leicestr and man u!

all in all oxlade, walcot and wilshere if i were them they will play out their heart because if wenger is gone by the end of season i think they are going aswell if they do nt improve because i know no manager will keep them for that long if not wenger.

why I left out Giroud and poldosky is because of the following reasons it all depend on cambel, sanogo, sanchez and walcot seasons really weather we need to release and buy a strike or just release / that and buy a left winger strike or giroud and poldosky show they worth coz in france giroud looked the part a also thought and poldosky was an immediate solution to the loss of RVP.

I do nt think there should be any selection problems, Ozil has just returned and Carzolar is on form and i do nt think Walcot can ox's place right now because he does not contribute defensively on the flanks.

He might probably do better as striker for arsenal than Alexis and Walcot because he plays as striker in his national team and he does a decent job there.

Let us not pretend not to know that the main reason Walcot has been benched is because of his contract situation.

let me tell you the truth, go and do research on every world class player, you will no that akpom is also going to be average player (like welbeck, chamberlain, etc) or close (near) to world class player (like walcot, ramsey, gibbs, wilshere, etc) because 1.

Is no rocket science that wenger prefers chamberlain or welbeck to walcot because of their workrate walcot has zero to none workrate.

I will prefer to see Wellbeck, ox and sanchez starts as d attacking trio against barca because of their pace, and their ability to beat a man with ease unlike Walcot... I hope Gabriel will recover in time to face barcelona, Arsenal wont escape barcelona onslaught if mertesacker should start.