Not exact matches
Clearly, the proposal that a
theological school's
study be focused through the lens of questions about congregations does not mean that somehow congregations
become the sole or even the central subject of disciplined inquiry.
The illusion that the now is either so insignificant and commonplace as to be unworthy of
study, or that it is so well known anyhow — without analysis, critical reflection, or even systematic observation — as to be beneath serious notice, has
become all too characteristic of a
theological tradition that knows perfectly well that we can not understand either God's grace or man's sinfulness without in some fundamental sense understanding the other first.
But by the time «catechetics,» as the
study of instruction,
became a
theological discipline in the seventeenth or eighteenth century, a curious reversal had taken place, and most of the talk was about dealing with children.
After Our Likeness
becomes more enigmatic when one recalls how carefully Volf has considered the historical
studies of scholars such as Yves Congar, the
theological insights of Reinhold Niebuhr and the ecclesial analyses of feminist and liberation thinkers.
The speech assessment exercise
became one more action in the service of «contemplation»; it pointed to an individual's need for «perfection» or «purification» by getting minimal instruction in «effectiveness» before
studying the more complex,
theological act of preaching.
Although I fought for and achieved admission as the first woman to take the full program of
theological studies that was reserved for priesthood candidates, I could not imagine as my male colleagues did that I could
become a theologian like Karl Rahner, Rudolf Bultmann or Rudolf Schnackenburg — decisively determining
theological questions and exegetical discussions.
As the new literature about «
theological education» began to grow during the past decade it quickly
became clear [l] that for some participants the central issue facing «
theological education» is the fragmentation of its course of
study and the need to reconceive it so as to recover its unity, whereas for others the central issue is «
theological education's» inadequacy to the pluralism of social and cultural locations in which the Christian thing is understood and lived.
Much as the
Study of Theological Education in the United States and Canada, directed by H. Richard Niebuhr in the 1950s, became an influential inquiry into the nature of the church and its ministry, so the Danforth study, ostensibly of campus ministries, became an important resource for exploring the necessary relation of religious faith, social ethics and public - policy formula
Study of
Theological Education in the United States and Canada, directed by H. Richard Niebuhr in the 1950s,
became an influential inquiry into the nature of the church and its ministry, so the Danforth
study, ostensibly of campus ministries, became an important resource for exploring the necessary relation of religious faith, social ethics and public - policy formula
study, ostensibly of campus ministries,
became an important resource for exploring the necessary relation of religious faith, social ethics and public - policy formulation.
Those
studies become less and less an occupation engaged in or intrinsic to his role as witness to the gospel and pastor to people, and
become more and more frantic efforts to find biblical, or
theological, generalities which will religiously dignify his promotional purposes.
The simple and yet profound act of speaking with one another has
become the center for a whole constellation of
studies philosophical,
theological, biblical, psychological, and practical.
Ministerial
studies tended to
become devoid of
theological foundations and neglectful of spiritual and moral concerns.
In any case, the purpose here is not to
study the British radicals but to describe this American
theological tradition and to ask under what conditions it might
become part of the very lively
theological discussion going on right now in this country.
If there were a clear and coherent
theological picture of the nature and purpose of ministry toward which the course of
study was ordered, then, he argues, the course of
study itself would
become an integral whole.
If Bible
study has
become a specialty or series of specialties today the reason is not to be sought simply in the development of specialization among teachers of theology but in the loss of a controlling idea in
theological education — an idea able to give unity to many partial inquiries.
Hence
theological study is hazardous; the involvement may
become so personal and emotional that intellectual activity ceases and the work of abstraction, comparison and criticism stops.
The tendency toward pluralism and the participation of the schools in the confusion of churches and ministers
becomes even more apparent in their efforts to add to the traditional core of
theological studies new disciplines which are to serve as bridges between the heritage and modern men, or, more immediately, between it and the needs of ministers in modern churches.
Becoming an AAPC certified pastoral counselor requires a serious commitment that begins with stringent education requirements — a B.A. and a Master of Divinity, or a master's or doctoral level degree in
theological / spiritual or biblical
studies, or a Masters or Doctoral level degree in pastoral counseling, from accredited colleges or universities.