Not exact matches
Just as he did in Earthly Powers, Burleigh's new book shows how the over-politicized state, having failed to wipe out Christianity,
became insanely jealous of it, eventually trying to appropriate its power and even adopting its rituals and rites to produce new, secularized religions, reproducing in reverse the
dogmatism they rejected but without any biblical restraints.
My third prediction is that the word «evangelical» will go the way of «fundamentalism» as its adherents
become increasingly homogonous and as the word
becomes associated with
dogmatism regarding politics, science, women's roles, homosexuality, salvation, and biblical literalism.
The net result has been a gathering malaise, a crisis of morale, and a dawning recognition that what was once a vital contribution to the emancipation of people from the constrictions of
dogmatism has
become a new constriction in its own right.
Nor will they forgive the neoliberal market
dogmatism that resulted in the British economy
becoming so unbalanced and so over-reliant on reckless financiers.
Of course, there's also the countercurrent, namely that in the end,
dogmatism can be overcome if someone is brave and persistent enough, and if mechanisms for paradigm shifting haven't
become completely ossified.
Alexander Harvey points out that the word I probably want to use is
dogmatism and dogmatist (although I was
becoming rather attached to Tom Fuller's «dogman.»)
The upstart view of one generation
became the inviolable creed of the next... It would be unrealistic to believe that
dogmatism in science ended... flagrant examples as the Nazi doctrine [eugenics] of Aryan racial supremacy and the Communist credo of dialectic materialism... less publicized instances... are known in every discipline in small or large degree.