Sentences with phrase «been at fault in the accident because»

Not exact matches

This is because the defective product litigation lawyers at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. believe in representing victims who have received a personal injury due to an accident that was not their fault.

Though Canadian law clearly protects pedestrians, many who are injured presume they have no legal recourse against the at - fault motorist because they were not traveling in a motor vehicle at the time of the accident.

If the first driver is determined to have suffered $ 100,000 worth of damages because of the accident, that number will be reduced by the percentage they were found to be at fault, which in this case is 15 %.

That creates an incentive for those drivers to take off if they are at fault in a crash because they could face criminal penalties for driving without insurance, and they may be held personally liable to compensate accident victims.

The at - fault driver effectively has no insurance because they can not be located, so the accident victim's uninsured motorist coverage kicks in as the sole means of compensation.

However, even if you are at fault in a motor vehicle accident and you are injured, your ICBC insurance coverage entitles you to certain benefits which are known as either «no fault benefits» or «Part 7 benefits» because they fall under Part 7 of the Regulations under the Insurance (Vehicle) Act.

The defendant argued that she was not at fault in the accident because the plaintiff was driving faster than the speed limit when the accident happened.

In theory, a victim who is 99 % responsible for an accident can still recover compensation because they were not entirely at - fault.

Here, one might think that the drunk driver who was involved in the original accident was at fault for the man's death because, but for her drunk driving, he would never have been in the position to have been hit by the passing semi-truck.

In fact, even with a valid prescription, a driver can still be at fault for causing an accident because it is known that, while the drug may be necessary to the drive's health, driving while taking the drug is dangerous.

Because California is an at - fault, or tort liability state for car accidents, determining fault in all crashes that result in damages, even if those damages are minor, is important.

Are you unable to work or enjoy a day at the Broadwater Parklands because you've been injured in an accident that wasn't your fault?

Because the apportionment of fault has meaningful implications for the financial outcome of a case — and, therefore, your recovery — it is essential that your lawyers be experienced in investigating accidents and demonstrating that other parties are at fault.

However, public transportation accidents can be especially challenging, because determining who was at fault in these crashes is so much more complicated than collisions involving motorcycles and passenger cars.

In the above story, the sleeping driver could have been at fault for the accident even if he was not drowsy, because he had veered into oncoming traffic.

This is because your driving reports will show a claim that was paid out under collision which normally means a driver is at fault in the accident.

That's because new insurance systems include what's called uninsured / underinsured motorist coverage, where the company agrees to pay costs in the event of an accident where the money can't be received from the at - fault party.

This is a big difference because if you are involved in an accident and not found to be at fault your insurance may not be used if you are in a tort state.

Insurance companies rarely give concrete answers to the question because they use many factors determine a rate increase, including a person's driving history, who was at fault in the accident and how serious the accident was.

If you are at fault, get a ticket for a serious violation (i.e. drunk driving), or are involved in an accident that racks up expensive property damage (i.e. crashing into a tree), your rates may increase at the time of renewing your policy because you will be categorized into another higher risk group of people who have recently been in an accident.

Because your Bartlett car insurance basic coverage will not pay for the costs to your own car if you are found at fault, many Bartlett residents will consider additional coverage to pay for any on and off road damage incurred if they are found at fault or in the event of a third party accident, such as a theft or a storm.

Many Keystone drivers carry much more than the minimum state - allowed level of coverage because in most car accidents, those minimums are not enough to handle the liability involved for the at - fault driver, especially when serious injuries are added to the equation.

Note that Virginia does not permit an auto insurance company to raise your rates because of an accident you were involved in if you were not determined to be wholly or partially at fault.

It's also important to ask about Uninsured / Underinsured Motorist coverage as well, because if you are involved in a «not - at - fault» accident it's how you get protected if other drivers are negligent and don't have insurance.

Liability coverage is cheap because it only covers the injuries or property damage you cause in an at - fault accident, not the vehicle you are driving.

However, minimum coverage levels are not recommended because it can leave you financially exposed in an at - fault accident.

Being involved in multiple accidents, especially when you're at fault, will drive up your premium because they indicate you will be more likely to file a claim.

Beyond the obvious legal connection and that fact that almost all drivers have to have car insurance liability protection according to state law, coverage is critical because the potential out of pocket costs in the aftermath of an at fault accident could be catastrophic for a driver who has no insurance.

This is partly because bodily injury liability insurance or its cash equivalent can be required if you are found to be at fault in an auto accident causing injury to others.

In general, it pays for hospitalization, medical tests, medical procedures, and sometimes other medical expenses incurred because of an auto accident, regardless of who is at - fault in the accidenIn general, it pays for hospitalization, medical tests, medical procedures, and sometimes other medical expenses incurred because of an auto accident, regardless of who is at - fault in the accidenin the accident.

While it may seem practical to choose the lesser of coverage amounts your auto insurance company offers, if you end up being at fault in an accident and are sued because of your fault, not having enough money to cover expenses will result in you owing money out of your own pocket.