I for one would like to see a more detailed statistical analysis
before accepting the conclusions.
Not exact matches
It is difficult to
accept that Parliament and public should have to await the
conclusion of negotiations
before having their say in some formal and structured way about the contents of the agreement.
While some skeptics say that more fossil evidence is needed
before they
accept this team's
conclusions, many agree that the discovery of a fossil ape from this time period is important since only one other had been found.
There are certainly climate scientists whose works and papers I would look at in great detail and not without complete analysis
before accepting (or rejecting) any of their
conclusions.
Before arriving at this
conclusion, did you even consider that it is more worthwhile to fight for it than
accept the fact that you committed this offense?