Not exact matches
Long
before she embarked upon the journey that is now the Corporation for Social Security Claiming Strategies, Cheryl was an avid researcher and writer as Managing Editor of the Law
Review and clerk in the
appellate screening division of the Rhode Island Supreme Court where she had several successes.....
Today is the court's last scheduled conference
before the Monday deadline to say whether it will
review an
appellate court's ruling in the...
Before joining DOT, Mr. Bradbury was a litigation partner at Dechert LLP in Washington, D.C., where his practice focused on regulatory enforcement and investigations, rulemaking and judicial
review of agency actions,
appellate cases, and antitrust matters.
In particular if I lost at the
appellate court, I'd petition for en - banc
review by all the judges in that
appellate court
before appealing to the Supreme Court.
The 2003 version of Family Proceedings Rules 1991, r 8.1 (3) requires that the judge, as
appellate tribunal, «be limited to a
review of the decision or order of the district judge», save where the «judge considers that... it would be in the interests of justice to hold a rehearing» — as happened, for example in R v R (Lump Sum Repayments)[2003] EWHC 3197 (Fam), [2004] 1 FLR 928, where Mr Justice Wilson (as he then was) decided that the evidence
before the district judge needed to be revisited by him.
Gambling: Members have considerable experience
before the First - tier Tribunal (Gambling), and acting in judicial
reviews before the High Court and
appellate courts.
In addition to his consultative work, Mark speaks
before human rights tribunals, in judicial
reviews,
before appellate courts, and is a frequent spokesperson for employers in collective bargaining and grievance arbitration.
On appeal, these proceedings «by indictment» are
reviewed by the Court of Appeal for Ontario usually
before a three member panel of
appellate judges although in rare cases a five member panel will sit.
Savvy clients also regularly bring GMSR in long
before the
appellate stage to draft dispositive motions,
review proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, and advise on strategy with an eye toward appeal.
In the event that removal is recommended, a seven - member
Review Tribunal of appellate justices, also appointed by the Texas Supreme Court, will review the record of the public trial and the hearing before the Commission to determine if the judge should be removed from o
Review Tribunal of
appellate justices, also appointed by the Texas Supreme Court, will
review the record of the public trial and the hearing before the Commission to determine if the judge should be removed from o
review the record of the public trial and the hearing
before the Commission to determine if the judge should be removed from office.
As I have noted
before, the fact that Gall seemed to loosen the stardards for
appellate review of variances will not always benefit defendants.
The standard of
review for findings of mixed law and fact is highly deferential, requiring a palpable and overriding error
before an
appellate court will intervene.
Before Campbell, it was well established that a good character direction will be of some value in every case in which it should be given (see R v Fulcher [1995] 2 Cr App R 251 at 260) and therefore, although a failure to give the direction will not necessarily render a conviction unsafe, with each case to be
reviewed in the light of its own facts (see Singh v The State [2005] UKPC 35, [2005] 4 All ER 781), it will rarely be possible for an
appellate court to say that such a failure could not have affected the outcome of the trial (see R v Kamar (1999) The Times, 14 May).
The question
before us is how this broad principle of governance translates into specific rules of
appellate review.
[30] Having concluded that the reasons of the Small Claims Court were facially incapable of
appellate review, the Divisional Court was obliged to consider the record
before the trial judge to determine if the reasons were more comprehensible when read in the context of this record.
(b)
before any administrative board or tribunal over which the court on which the judge served exercised an
appellate or judicial
review jurisdiction