Not exact matches
Since this debate over pipelines began in earnest last Fall, Jason Kenney and others have been calling on the
federal government to invoke clause 92 (10)(c) of the Constitution, which allows the
federal government to exert authority over infrastructure such as pipelines which, «although wholly situate within the Province, are
before or after their Execution declared by the
Parliament of Canada to be for the general Advantage of Canada or for the Advantage of Two or more of the Provinces.»
The vote was taken in the Bundestag in Berlin during the last session of the German
parliament before federal elections in September.
Before the German
federal election in September 2017, the
parliament (Bundestag) had 631 members; now it has 709.
Swedlove says Canada's life insurers aren't in favour of
federal legislation, currently
before Parliament, that would impose limits on how much genetic information can be collected.
As to the second question put
before it — whether the most recent version of the draft of the
federal Capital Markets Stability Act exceeded the authority of the
Parliament of Canada over the general branch of the trade and commerce power under s. 91 (2) of the Constitution Act, 1867 — the Court of Appeal answered «no» to it as well.
It is important to remember that the reason there is now a Fair Elections Act
before Parliament is what
Federal Court Judge Richard Mosley identified as widespread voter suppression tactics during the 2011 campaign.
Justice Hughes of the
Federal Court held that the duty to consult was triggered in this case but only after the two bills were introduced into
Parliament and not
before.
[3] On the basis of the applicant's cassation appeal with the Supreme Administrative Court by order dated 9.5.2012, No. 6 Ads 18/2012 -82, reversed in accordance with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the interpretation of European Union law on the Court and presented him the following questions: 6 Ads 18/2012 First Excludes Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes nazaměstna not persons and their families moving within the Community (Regulation of the European
Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case,
before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak
Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European
Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Republic?
Research at the Faculty is supported by
federal as well as provincial research grants and leads to varied products, including books, journal articles, policy documents, government advisory papers, consultation documents and expert testimony
before Provincial Legislatures and
Parliament.
At a hearing
before the European
Parliament on January 21, 2008, EPIC President Marc Rotenberg testified (pdf) that the European Commission must establish privacy safeguards because the US
Federal Trade Commission failed to do so (pdf) during the US merger review.
(68) This was made quite clear by the National Indigenous Working Group the day
before the legislation passed through
Federal Parliament on 8 July 1998: (69)