Sentences with phrase «before issuing the trial»

They are entitled to an expeditious trial, so there is no time to lose before issuing the trial judgment.

Not exact matches

Expand the PTO's transitional program for covered business method patents to include a broader category of computer - enabled patents and permit a wider range of challengers to petition for review of issued patents before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB).

While before you were left with just trial and error to figure out the issue, with sign language your kid can tell you if they are still hungry, all done, or need a diaper change.

The primary issue before us is whether trial court's award of joint custody is in the best interests of the Burham children.

That order, issued in April 2000 by the Department of Professional Regulation, was vacated by a McHenry County judge just before the trial.

«The issue before the trial court was whether the 1st respondent (PDP) can rubbish the judgment / order of the court for whatever reason and set up a caretaker committee, other claims notwithstanding.

As it stands, it is clear that the court below premised its decision on this issue on a wrong appreciation of the claim of the appellants before the trial Federal High Court.

«He however, will like to put it on record that the facts of the substantial matter are not before the Supreme Court since the apex court was only invited to rule on some preliminary issues in the process of commencing the trial.

On 10 counts, that could mean a jury, as seen before in at least one Albany - related corruption trial, convicts on some counts, acquits on others and issues no verdicts on some charges.

Dasuki who is standing trial on allegation of alleged misappropriation of $ 2.1 bn along with four others before Justice Baba Yusuf insisted that the charges against him by the complainant on the same issue constituted a gross abuse of court process.

In an unusual move designed to make criminal trials fairer, state Court of Appeals Chief Judge Janet DiFiore issued a new rule requiring judges to forcefully order prosecutors to search their files and disclose all evidence favorable to the defense at least 30 days before major trials.

The former National Security Adviser, Colonel Sambo Dasuki has appeared before Federal High Court in Abuja in line with the subpoena issued to him by the court to give evidence in the trial of former National Publicity Secretary of the People Democratic Party (PDP) Mer Olisah Metuh on N400 million corruption charges.

Washington (CNN)- In a highly unusual move, every Republican member of the House ethics committee issued a statement Tuesday blasting the Democratic chairwoman for «stalling» on making a decision on whether to hold trials for New York Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel and California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters before November's election.

Dasuki who is standing trial on allegation of alleged misappropriation of fund along with four others before Justice Baba Yusuf had insisted that the charges against him by the complainant on the same issue constituted a gross abuse of court process.

Ron argues that now is a good opportunity for the legislature to earn the community's trust and address the issue before the trial for the bid - rigging scandal as the legislative session ends.

Dasuki has been put on trial before Justice Baba Yusuf and another charge was filed against him before Justice Peter Affem both of the FCT High Court on the same issue and subject.

It may be advisable for the state to issue a statement from the surgeon general before the next corruption trial: «WARNING: Taking part on this jury may cause low self - esteem, chest pains, sprained ankles, feelings of passive - aggressiveness toward others, and hatred toward government, and may complicate your social life.»

The Magistrate 11, Olusola Aluko, had issued bench warrant against the monarch who was standing trial before him.

«Before beginning the trial, we discussed this issue extensively with patients and families in the NPC community, as well as with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),» Ory said.

The effect one white American Olympic participant had on another may not be as substantial a story to take up the 24 - hour news cycle as the issue of systemic racism highlighted by the Rodney King beating and the O.J. Simpson trial, which happened before and after the main events of this film, but it works to sell one of the film's notable points.

Fixed an issue in «The Point of the Spear» where some players could safely drop into areas of the map during the Brave trials before speaking with Rost.

That means the system must issue a warning before a specified time in 5 of 7 test trials under three scenarios.

Now therefore, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of Settling Defendants, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed:

At the trial before Justice Thomas Lederer in February, a key issue turned out to be whether Kirby had an obligation to alert the Powells to the significance of the summary of the home inspection.

In the interim before we started the trial, my vet recommended Royal Canin Gastrointestinal High Energy and his stomach / digestive issues disappeared!

The driving complaints wouldn't have been as much of an issue if it wasn't that the game ostensibly forces the gameplay down your throat; for example the Riddler challenges (not the trophies which are still pretty much the same as before) have a heavy - weighting towards car time - trials which are often frustrating and unwieldy.

Fixed an issue in «The Point of the Spear» where some players could safely drop into areas of the map during the Brave trials before speaking with Rost.

As I dug deeper I was struck by the sense of outrage and loss this painting aroused in so many people: The family of Lea Bondi, determined to reclaim the stolen portrait she had failed to recover in her lifetime; the Manhattan District Attorney who sent shock waves through the international art world and enraged many of New York's most prominent cultural organizations when he issued a subpoena and launched a criminal investigation following the surprise resurfacing of Portrait of Wally; the New York art dealer who tipped off a reporter about the painting during the opening of the Schiele exhibition at MoMA; the Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security who vowed not to retire until the fight was over; the art theft investigator who unearthed the post-war subterfuge and confusion that ultimately landed the painting in the hands of a young, obsessed Schiele collector; the museum official who testified before Congress that the seizure of Portrait of Wally could have a crippling effect on the ability of American museums to borrow works of art; the Assistant United States Attorney who took the case to the eve of trial; and the legendary Schiele collector who bartered for Portrait of Wally in the early 1950s and fought to the end of his life to bring it home to Vienna.

You can win on issues that arise during hearings or trials before the court if you know the little ins and outs of the rules.

If you respond that you couldn't raise certain issues in the case because your client told you a few hours before trial that he'd had several affairs before his wife left, you'd be violating attorney client privilege.

Since the high court's order was issued in a proceeding that is ongoing, the plaintiff's claim for damages may still prevail, although he will be unable to prevent the defendant's proposed expert from performing a medical examination on him before the case proceeds to trial.

Earlier this month, one state's appellate court issued a written opinion in a medical malpractice case that required the court to determine whether the single doctor named as a defendant should be able to introduce evidence that there had originally been several other doctors named as defendants, but they had all settled with the plaintiff before the case reached trial.

For the majority of offences, no permission from the CPS or equivalent is needed and so the first step is usually an application to a magistrates» court to issue a summons or warrant which, if granted, begins the proceedings culminating in a trial either in the magistrates court, or in an appropriate case before a jury in the crown court.

We also have an extensive amicus practice before the US Supreme Court and other appellate courts and regularly brief, argue, and advise on complex legal issues that arise in various trial - level fora.

Vermont's uncontested divorce process allows spouses to reach an agreement on all issues in their divorce and avoid the headache and stress of attending a trial before a judge.

Canadian family courts and lawyers actively encourage divorcing couples to resolve issues before the case even reaches the trial stage.

Robert routinely advises clients on tax issues in connection with business planning and has represented clients before the IRS and the United States Tax Court; always aiming to resolve tax controversies through negotiation, which is typically less expensive and faster than a trial, thus minimizing the cost of tax disputes and their impact on business operations and productivity.

All parenting issues were scheduled for a subsequent ten day trial before a different judge.

The couple sued for wrongful dismissal, and before a trial could be held, they brought a preliminary motion, asking the court to reinstate them to their jobs and to force Quadrus and London Life to issue a notice to the industry and their clients, stating that they hadn't done anything wrong.

The problem with this approach, as Justice Butler makes clear, is that a trial judge can not do their job without all the issues before them.

Pre-trial — a pre-trial conference is held before a Master or Judge in order to canvass settlement, determine readiness for trial, discuss trial issues, identify the witnesses, determine trial procedure and set trial dates.

Where a case has been unsuccessful, the court proceeds to hold a mandatory case management conference with the parties and their counsel (as another means of exploring the issues in dispute and possible resolution) before proceeding to trial.

Sowinski: That's why we suggest that clients require prior approval before law firms undertake, for instance, extraordinary research of a legal issue, or prior to beginning trial prep.

«Before setting out my analysis of the issues, I will state once again, that the attempt to determine spousal support, child support and parenting issues at two separate trials before different judges should be avoided wherever possible.&Before setting out my analysis of the issues, I will state once again, that the attempt to determine spousal support, child support and parenting issues at two separate trials before different judges should be avoided wherever possible.&before different judges should be avoided wherever possible.»

Consequently, for a judge not to allow defense voir dire / cross examination questioning of a prosecution witness before a damning exhibit is allowed into evidence, presents not only a Due Process issue but also a possible perception of pro-prosecutorial bias of the judge, whether or not that bias exists, at least in the eyes of laypeople watching the trial, when a critical element of a sufficiently functioning judicial system is for the public to perceive judges as following their oaths of office.

The sentencing hearing occurs after the trial and before the judge issues his or her sentencing decision.

«[Group 2] will require individual issue trials to quantify their wrongful dismissal losses, and in those individual issues trials, will have to give credit for what they recover in the proceedings before the OLRB for unpaid wages and vacation pay.»

The claim had not been compromised as the judge had stated and so the judge had not been bound by BCT Software Solutions Ltd v C Brewer & Sons Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 393, [2003] All ER (D) 196 (Jul)-- where parties have settled on all issues save costs before a trial or where a trial is incomplete, the court should not, save in a reasonably obvious case, embark on making an order for costs because the court will have no proper basis of agreed or determined facts upon which to base its decision.

Before a summary judgment judge should use the expanded powers under Rule 20, they should first determine whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial based on the evidence which is already beforeBefore a summary judgment judge should use the expanded powers under Rule 20, they should first determine whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial based on the evidence which is already beforebefore them.

I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and sTrial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and strial), and so on.