Both movies shake our confidence in how we would
behave under the same circumstances, but while Experimenter struggles to find the drama in the story of a scientist and his well - known experiment, Kyle Patrick Alvarez's The Stanford Prison Experiment has the benefit of a narrative, and even thought we know the outcome, he and his outstanding cast manage to move the characters and their story from a novelty to a nightmare.
Not exact matches
To ask this, I must imagine myself into those
circumstances as the other person; to answer it I have recourse only to my values — but these are grounded in the next, Kantian extension of the imaginative habit: what kind of world would this be if everybody were to
behave / react in this manner
under the
same, possibly mitigating,
circumstances?
Furthermore, we assumed above that all neurons of one type
behave in the
same way in all normal brains, just as all polar bears hunt seals
under normal
circumstances.
May I suggest that the real world has
behaved differently
under the
same circumstances (few or no visible sunspots).
The law defines negligence as the failure to
behave with the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised
under the
same circumstances.
Negligence is defined as «A failure to
behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised
under the
same circumstances.»