Or asking a student to write about how
the behavior affected other people might be far more effective than sending that student to the office.
Not exact matches
However, these odds don't factor in a
person's individual
behaviors, age, sex, location, or
other things that can
affect risks — they're averages of the entire US population.
Laws regulate how some
people's
behavior affects others.
For instance, when these characteristics are perceived as exhibited in an individual enduringly and in a sense in which these are understood to
affect the world around in a favorable fashion — either in an objective sense of effecting something concrete outside such a
person [like effecting healing, foretelling, acting as medium in a non-rational manner or simply doing good or saying good to help the
people selflessly], exhibiting personal traits, conditions and states which are known to be «abnormal» [like going into trances, hearing voices, seeing visions, or just the simple unconventional
behavior, which proceed from such an individual's horizon to
affect, influence, impact
others» horizons]-- or is subjectively perceived to be extra-ordinary — such an individual is said to be godly, god - bearing, pious or saintly.
However, such metaphoric language is more than ornament,
affecting people's conceptual systems and thought processes, influencing how they perceive
others, and determining their political views and
behavior.
The implications of expressing the thesis as such an equation are (1) if the viewed action is not at all salient for the
person (i.e., = 0) the action will not
affect the viewer's
behavior («act»); (2) the chance that a particular viewed action will
affect a
person's
behavior will decrease to the extent that they have
other alternatives in their «repertoire»; and (3) if the individual is not aroused to act he will not exhibit the viewed
behavior, no matter how salient it is.
Yes, our actions
affect other people, but it is the selfish, egocentric cheater that only sees how his / her spouses
behavior effects him / her, and not how their
behavior affects their spouse.
«Research has shown that
people are more likely to break the rules when they see
others do it first, but we were interested in whether
other people's bad
behavior affects how
people respond to imitators.»
Honing these
behaviors in yourself and understanding them in
others can greatly
affect how much trust and respect you build with
people, and how persuasive you are.
He is exploring how the loss of touch
affects other neural circuits and
behavior — similar to how hearing is enhanced in many blind
people.
On a restorative practices continuum, the informal practices include affective statements and questions that communicate
peoples» feelings, and allow for reflection on how their
behavior has
affected others.
They can also be helpful for Fido, Lassie and
other dogs as well — and for many of the same reasons they're good for
people; they
affect everything from inflammation pathways to the moods and
behaviors of our four - legged friends [source: Benson].
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any
other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly
affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the
other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive
behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the
other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or
other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17)
other factors as the court considers necessary.
As a licensed
behavior specialist, I assess
behaviors and functioning to foster understanding about the way in which the challenges and mental health issues that one
person faces can both positively and negatively
affect others.»
But it is always a good thing to remind them of how the social media works and how their online
behavior can
affect other people, Elearning Feeds reported.
Each
person's
behavior both
affects and is
affected by the
other person's
behavior.
In fact, research has shown that when
people lose their ability to mentalize their experience — usually in the context of high
affect and threats to emotional security — they have a hard time making sense of
other people's
behavior and their own.
Effects of Ideal Partner Preferences Beyond Attraction and Relationships: How do ideal partner preferences
affect people's feelings and
behaviors in
other domains?
Fighting with
people you love is never fun and it is likely that
others in your life have become
affected by your negative
behavior.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any
other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly
affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the
other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive
behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the
other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or
other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17)
other factors as the court considers necessary