Sentences with phrase «behavior following partner»

Not exact matches

Divided into three sections, the book covers «The Unconscious Marriage,» which details a marriage in which the remaining desires and behavior of childhood interfere with the current relationship; «The Conscious Marriage,» which shows a marriage that fulfils those childhood needs in a positive manner; and a 10 - week «course in relationship therapy,» which gives detailed exercises for you and your partner to follow in order to learn how to «replace confrontation and criticism... with a healing process of mutual growth and support.»

Consumer behavior toward online dating influenced Avalanche's decision to further develop its API and partner with Lead Wrench to ensure it followed best - practices for working with affiliates, and marketing their data.

Today, a group of product - focused creators — «Hooked» author Nir Eyal, Product Hunt «s Ryan Hoover, and Greylock Partners «s Josh Elman, among others — are hoping to follow up on that newsletter's success with the launch of Product Psychology, a weekly course on the psychology of user behavior.

When you do fight, avoid the following unhealthy behaviors, identified by marriage researcher and psychologist John M. Gottman, Ph.D.: contempt for your partner, defensiveness, refusing to talk, and negative remarks about your partner or name - calling.

Translates their behavior, in an empathic tone that amplifies their pain as follows: You don't feel loved or cared about and when that happens you do that to your partner.

Christine Buchanan, Eleanor Maccoby, and Sanford Dornbusch found that adolescents had fewer emotional and behavior problems following divorce if their mothers remarried than if they cohabited with a partner.31 Similarly, two studies of African American families found that children were better off in certain respects if they lived with stepfathers than with their mother's cohabiting partners.32 In contrast, Susan Brown found no significant differences between children in married and cohabiting stepfamilies.33 Although these data suggest that children may be better off if single mothers marry their partners rather than cohabit, the small number of studies on this topic makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

Some scholars have argued recently that intrusive behavior (like snooping) occurs when someone puts their own self - interest and need for reassurance above their partner's need for privacy (in other words, intrusive behavior occurs when Blake follows his impulse to go through his partner Taylor's phone to satisfy his own needs at the expense of respecting Taylor's privacy).1 So what matters for intrusive behavior: trust, self - control, or both?

Our own Dr. Amy Muise published a study finding that social network use (e.g., Facebook) can promote jealousy in relationships, because you are exposed to ambiguous information about your partner's behaviors.1 In your case, you don't have a clear picture of your partner's motives for following other women on Instagram.

Assessments conducted at earlier phases are specified in previous articles.7, 8 At the 15 - year follow - up assessment, adolescents completed interviews that measured whether they had been adjudicated a person in need of supervision (PINS) resulting from incorrigible behavior such as recurrent truancy or destroying parents» property; their frequency of running away from home; and the number of times they had been stopped by the police, arrested, convicted of a crime or of probation violations, and sent to youth correctional facilities.14 They also reported on their disruptive behavior in school; number of school suspensions; delinquent and aggressive behavior outside school; experience of sexual intercourse; rates of pregnancy; lifetime number of sexual partners; and frequency of using cigarettes, alcohol, and illegal drugs during the 6 - month period prior to the 15 - year interview.15

First, the few studies that have followed participants beyond the immediate intervention period (6 months or less) have noted a decay of intervention effect on behavior over time, 5,6 prompting members of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel: Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisitionbehavior over time, 5,6 prompting members of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel: Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk Behavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisitionBehavior to identify sustainability of program effectiveness as 1 of the most important questions that professionals who are concerned with risk prevention face.7 A challenge for behavioral change interventions in general, this issue is particularly vexing for interventions that target decreased involvement in sex and substance use with advancing age during adolescence.8, 9 Second, multiple behaviors (sex without a condom, sex with multiple partners, substance use before sex, etc) directly and indirectly place individuals at risk for acquisition of HIV.

Couples often seek counseling to assist them with the following: communication difficulties, intimacy, emotional expressiveness, alternatives to separation or divorce, promoting family cohesiveness and cooperation, cooperative parenting, affairs, conflict resolution, sexual difficulties, balancing relationships and family responsibilities, time management to enhance couple intimacy and satisfaction, improve marital satisfaction, couple enrichment, strengthening partnership and committment, improving the quality of life as a couple, enhancing romantic love, learning to prioritize the marriage, couples communication assessment, exploring patterns of interaction, the development of healthy patterns of communication and behavior for new couples as they strive to build a strong foundation of love, learning how to speak with respect and understanding with their partners, avoiding abusive and toxic interactions.

Assessments of child behavior, self - and partner - reported parenting, and the interparental relationship were conducted at T1 (pre), T2 (post), and T3 (6 - month follow - up).

If you are unsure how your partner might react to a particular behavior, ask yourself the following questions:

Conflict behaviors were defined as follows: (a) conflict, the level of tension, hostility, dissension, antagonism, or negative affect; (b) defensiveness, trying to avoid blame or responsibility; (c) contempt, lack of respect, insult, mockery, sarcasm, or derision of partner; (d) withdrawal, an avoidance of the interaction or of the problem discussion in some way; (e) demand, hounding or nagging partner; (f) communication skills, level of appropriate and positive expressive skills; (g) support - validation, appropriate and positive listening and speaking skills that convey supportiveness or understanding; (h) problem solving, the ability to constructively define a problem and work toward a mutually satisfactory solution; and (i) humor, trying to make a joke, finding something funny about the situation.

He is currently collaborating on projects examining how romantic partners» risky sexual histories and negative health outcomes are associated over time, and how delinquent girls» sexual behaviors and outcomes change following foster care placement.

Although the observed support behaviors were coded into 10 categories, we analyzed the data for only the following categories in the current study: (1) Positive support seeking (e.g., gives clear analysis of the problem, recognizes partner as an aid, agrees with provider's suggestions); (2) Negative support seeking (e.g., rejects help, criticizes the support provider, makes demands for support, complains); (3) Positive emotional support provision (e.g., reassures, encourages expression of feelings, provides genuine encouragement); (4) Positive instrumental support provision (e.g., offers specific plan or assistance, gives helpful advice); (5) Negative support provision (e.g., criticizes, minimizes problem, is inattentive, offers unhelpful advice).

The main results can be summarized as follows: (1) Synchrony during early mother - child interactions has neurophysiological correlates [85] as evidenced though the study of vagal tone [78], cortisol levels [80], and skin conductance [79]; (2) Synchrony impacts infant's cognitive processing [64], school adjustment [86], learning of word - object relations [87], naming of object wholes more than object parts [88]; and IQ [67], [89]; (3) Synchrony is correlated with and / or predicts better adaptation overall (e.g., the capacity for empathy in adolescence [89]; symbolic play and internal state speech [77]; the relation between mind - related comments and attachment security [90], [91]; and mutual initiation and mutual compliance [74], [92]-RRB-; (3) Lack of synchrony is related to at risk individuals and / or temperamental difficulties such as home observation in identifying problem dyads [93], as well as mother - reported internalizing behaviors [94]; (4) Synchrony has been observable within several behavioral or sensorial modalities: smile strength and eye constriction [52]; tonal and temporal analysis of vocal interactions [95](although, the association between vocal interactions and synchrony differs between immigrant (lower synchrony) and non-immigrant groups [84]-RRB-; mutual gaze [96]; and coordinated movements [37]; (5) Each partner (including the infant) appears to play a role in restoring synchrony during interactions: children have coping behaviors for repairing interactive mismatches [97]; and infants are able to communicate intent and to respond to the intent expressed by the mother at the age of 2 months [98].

Following the conflict discussion, participants were asked to evaluate the conflict on the dimensions «validity of the task, stressfulness of the task, positive own and partner's behavior, negative own and partner's behavior, and solution - oriented own and partner's behavior», using a standard evaluation questionnaire (cf. Hahlweg and Jacobson, 1984) and were again asked to rate their emotional arousal and specific emotions.