Netiquette covers not only rules of
behavior during discussions but also guidelines that reflect the unique electronic nature of the medium.
Men and women in the study, despite showing similar
behaviors during the discussion, actually experienced the conversation quite differently.
Not exact matches
The well - child checkups
during your child's second year are similar to those before, but
discussions with your doctor about
behavior and habits may become more detailed as your toddler gets older.
Michelle Dockery is all smiles as she speaks on stage at the panel
discussion for her upcoming show Good
Behavior held
during the Turner portion of the 2016 Summer TCA Tour at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on Sunday (July 31) in Beverly Hills, Calif..
This leader filters Culture Analysis for all positive
behaviors tracked
during the first quarter to guide a
discussion with 6th Grade teacher, Mr. Hathaway, about his classroom culture.
See a partial list of classesCanine Ethology History of Dog Training Canine Cognition Learning Theory Overview Building Trust and Positive Relationships with Dogs The «Positively» Philosophy Self - Care & Burnout Prevention Canine Emotion and
Behavior Canine Communication Canine Body Language
Behavior Observation &
Discussion Positive Training Tools & Methods Demonstrations & Hands - on Practice of Tools Human Communication Living with Dogs Preventing and Addressing Canine Fear and Stress Mock Group Classes Interpersonal Skills — Working with the Client Dog Trainer as Agent of Human Change Dog Bite Prevention Aggression Working Dogs Positive Training with Other Species Teaching Group Classes Teaching Private lessons Veterinarian Relationships Behavioral Medicine Medical Handling Lab When to Refer / Ethics Dog Law Business Marketing for Dog Trainers And more... taught
during the in - person intensives.
And Emma Jelley, general counsel at Onfido, remarked
during the GDPR panel
discussion that lawyers should be working with organizational psychologists since we're attempting to change human
behavior.
At each time point, couples individually self - reported on violence in the relationship and participated in a conflict
discussion during which
behaviors that show a propensity toward violence (i.e., contempt, belligerence, domineering, anger, and defensiveness) were observed.
Although this study only examined positive (capitalization) interactions, more avoidantly - attached individuals show similar patterns
during a
discussion of relationship conflict: compared to the
behavior ratings of third - party observers, individuals higher in attachment avoidance report less responsiveness in terms of both their own and their partner's
behavior.5
For example, satisfied married couples coordinate, or mirror their body movements more
during conflict
discussions than dissatisfied couples.5 Another study found that when participants believed that they were interacting with someone from an out - group, they were more likely to synchronize their physical
behaviors with them than an in - group member.4 If you are fighting with your partner and face the possibility of exclusion or rejection, you may unknowingly imitate him or her in order to feel closer to them.6
Plotted scores for the affective
behavior of two example couples
during the conflict
discussion task.
Indeed, even
during conflict
discussions, 50 % of couples had 7 or fewer hostile
behaviors (range, 0 - 63).
Indices of observed parenting
behavior were derived from the coding of videotapes of three family interaction tasks (a conflict
discussion task, an unfamiliar game task, and a structured - family interaction task),
during which both parents and the target child participated.
During the first GCRC admission, two 10 - minute
discussions assessed couples»
behavior toward each other when soliciting and offering social support.32 The first spouse, selected randomly, was asked to «talk about something you would like to change about yourself,» while the partner was instructed to «be involved in the
discussion and respond in whatever way you wish.»
The coding system contained 27 items on a 9 - point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much), indicating the extent to which the
behavior was present
during the
discussion task.