Sentences with phrase «behaviour in the intervention group»

These figures suggest that, although there was a small increase in ECBI intensity scale scores at 12 months, improvements in mental health and behaviour in intervention group children were largely maintained over time.

Not exact matches

The increased socioeconomic inequalities in breastfeeding observed in the intervention group supports the argument that population intervention strategies could inadvertently exacerbate, rather than mitigate, socioeconomic inequalities, particularly when the intervention aims to change individual behaviours rather than targeting «upstream» structural changes.25 Our results are also compatible with an observational study from Brazil reporting that breastfeeding rates increased first among the socioeconomically better - off, followed by increases among the poor, over a 20 - year period of active breastfeeding promotion campaigns in Brazil.26

In the intervention group, parenting skills as well as the child's disruptive behaviour, ADHD symptoms, anxiety, sleep problems and empathy improved significantly when compared with the control group and the results were permanent throughout the 12 - month follow - up.

This took place with the aid of a standardized questionnaire (on the basis of a Social Responsiveness Scale — SRS), in which 65 behaviour patterns were evaluated by the parents before the start of group therapy, at the end of the intervention as well as three months after the end of the intervention in order to measure stability.

Of a number of published evidence reviews on strategies for preventing childhood obesity, 8 — 15 only one published in 2007 has focused on environmental influences of obesity - related dietary behaviours in children and young people (aged 3 — 18 years).15 It found consistent associations between parental influences (parental food intake and education) and obesity in this age group.15 The early years are a priority population for intervention strategies for two reasons.

The meta - analysis of parent - reported child behaviour shown in figure 2 included eight studies.36 45 48 52 55 58 59 The analysis showed a small but significant effect on child behaviour (d = 0.14; 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.26) favouring the intervention group.

Care and development / Care for others / Care for the caregivers / Care, learning and treatment / Care leavers / Care work / Care workers (1) / Care workers (2) / Care workers (3) / Care workers (4) / Care worker role / Care workers (1983) / Care worker turnover / Caregiver roles / Caregiver's dilemma / Carers (1) / Carers (2) / Carers support groups / Caring / Caring and its discontents / Caring for carers / Caring for children / Caring interaction / Caring relationships / Carpe minutum / Casing / Cause and behavior / Causes of stress / Celebrate / Challenging behaviours / Challenging children and A. S. Neill / Change (1) / Change (2) / Change and child care workers / Change in world view / Change theory / Changing a child's world view / Changing behaviour / Child, active or passive / Child Advocacy / Child and youth care (1) / Child and youth care (2) / Child and youth care and mental health / Child and youth care education / Child and youth care work unique / Child behaviour and family functioning / Child care and the organization / Child care workers (1) / Child Care workers (2) / Child care workers (3) / Child care workers: catalysts for a future world / Childcare workers in Ireland / Child carers / Child health in foster care / Child in pain / Child perspective in FGC / Child saving movement / Child's perspective / Child's play / Child's security / Children and power / Children and television / Children in care / Children in state care / Children of alcoholics (1) / Children of alcoholics (2) / Children today / Children who hate (1) / Children who hate (2) / Children who hate (3) / Children who were in care / Children whose defenses work overtime / Children's ability to give consent / Children's emotions / Children's feelings / Children's grief / Children's homes / Children's homes in UK / Children's rights (1) / Children's rights (2) / Children's rights (3) / Children's stress / Children's views (1) / Children's views (2) / Children's views on smacking / Children's voices / Children's work and child labour / Choices in caring / Choices for youth / Circular effect behavior / Clare Winnicott / Class teacher / Classroom meetings / Clear thought / Client self - determination / Clinical application of humour / Coaching approach / Coercion / Coercion and compliance (1) / Coercion and compliance (2) / Cognitive - behavioral interventions and anger / Cognitive skills / Collaboration / Commissioner for children / Commitment to care / Common needs / Common profession?

I am your neighbour / Ideas about the family / Ideals and limitations / Identities / Identity and relationship / Identity vs role confusion / Image of social care / Immediacy / Impediments to permanency / Importance of cooperation / Importance of fathers / Impulsivity and irrational beliefs / In - between / Including families / Inclusion / Independent living / Independent living skills / Indications for treatment / Individual and residential treatment / Individual antisepsis / Individual demands / Individual differences / Individual experiences / Individual recognition / Individual sessions / Individuals and groups / Indoor noise / Indulging the deprived child / Inner pain / Inner world / Innovative book / Insecure attachment / Inside kid / Institutional care in Germany / Interactive learning / Intercultural relationships / Interest contagion / Intergenerational programs / Intergenerational theory / Intergenerational work / Internal / external control / Interpersonal dependence / Interpersonal responses / Interpretation as interference / Interpreting behaviour / Interpretive systems / Inter-staff relationships / Intervention environment / Interventions / Interview / Intimate familiarity / Introducing supervision / Intuitive decision - making / Investment in relationships / Invisible suffering / Involvement of families / Involving families / Involving young people / Irish view / Irrational acceptance / Isibindi project / Isolation rooms / I've been an adult too loIn - between / Including families / Inclusion / Independent living / Independent living skills / Indications for treatment / Individual and residential treatment / Individual antisepsis / Individual demands / Individual differences / Individual experiences / Individual recognition / Individual sessions / Individuals and groups / Indoor noise / Indulging the deprived child / Inner pain / Inner world / Innovative book / Insecure attachment / Inside kid / Institutional care in Germany / Interactive learning / Intercultural relationships / Interest contagion / Intergenerational programs / Intergenerational theory / Intergenerational work / Internal / external control / Interpersonal dependence / Interpersonal responses / Interpretation as interference / Interpreting behaviour / Interpretive systems / Inter-staff relationships / Intervention environment / Interventions / Interview / Intimate familiarity / Introducing supervision / Intuitive decision - making / Investment in relationships / Invisible suffering / Involvement of families / Involving families / Involving young people / Irish view / Irrational acceptance / Isibindi project / Isolation rooms / I've been an adult too loin Germany / Interactive learning / Intercultural relationships / Interest contagion / Intergenerational programs / Intergenerational theory / Intergenerational work / Internal / external control / Interpersonal dependence / Interpersonal responses / Interpretation as interference / Interpreting behaviour / Interpretive systems / Inter-staff relationships / Intervention environment / Interventions / Interview / Intimate familiarity / Introducing supervision / Intuitive decision - making / Investment in relationships / Invisible suffering / Involvement of families / Involving families / Involving young people / Irish view / Irrational acceptance / Isibindi project / Isolation rooms / I've been an adult too loin relationships / Invisible suffering / Involvement of families / Involving families / Involving young people / Irish view / Irrational acceptance / Isibindi project / Isolation rooms / I've been an adult too long

Nevertheless, an advantage persisted in the Watch, Wait and Wonder intervention group in relation to mothers» comfort dealing with infant behaviours and their ratings of parenting stress which improved more in this group from the end of treatment to follow - up.

This finding is consistent with the results of other studies, 34 and many service providers are trying to find ways to encourage fathers to attend parenting programmes.35 Reports of difficulty sustaining behaviour change over time and the desire for further support have also been reported previously.9, 33 Continuing support to the group from both volunteers and professionals has been proposed as well as flexible, open access, non-structured sources of support.37 Previous studies have also suggested that 30 — 50 % of families who take part in parenting programmes are likely to show no benefit because of other events in their lives, and may therefore need more than a single intervention.36

The block randomised design was chosen because it is a more practical design to use for trials of health promoting interventions delivered in groups.26 Only parents of children whose behaviour fell in the worst half of the distribution were invited to take part because of concerns about documenting change in population samples using instruments designed to identify and measure change in clinical populations.

Our observation that the improvement in both the ECBI intensity score, a measure based primarily on problem behaviours, and the SDQ (conduct) scores was significantly greater in the intervention than the control group provides confidence that the intervention was effective, at least as far as these aspects of children's mental health was concerned.

The main aim of the trial was to detect a difference between the control and intervention groups in the changes observed in the Eyberg child behaviour inventory intensity score.

The fact that the decline in scores on both measures in the intervention group was maintained over the six months following the intervention suggests that the intervention had an enduring effect on behaviour.

The mean (raw) externalising behaviour scores were similar in the intervention and control groups at 18 months (mean 12.1 (SD 6.9) v 11.9 (6.8); adjusted mean difference 0.16, 95 % confidence interval − 1.01 to 1.33; P = 0.79) and 24 months (mean 11.9 (SD 7.2) v 12.9 (7.4); adjusted mean difference − 0.79, − 2.27 to 0.69; P = 0.30).

Group parenting programmes have been shown to have a positive impact on the mental health of children and parents in the short term.9 — 12 Positive results have been obtained from randomised controlled trials and other studies with parents of children with clinically defined behaviour disorders, 9,13,14 children at high risk of behaviour problems, 9,15 and to a lesser extent with normal populations.16, 17 They have also been obtained in trials of interventions for parents and children of different ages.18, 19 The number of trials carried out in the UK is small.13, 15,20,21 A recent systematic review concluded that these programmes are effective in the long term, 12 but most of the trials on which this review was based used a waiting list control design, and as a result outcome data are not reported on the control groups beyond 6 months.

The SDQ prosocial subscale, measuring increases in the child's positive behaviours, showed a benefit in the intervention group at both immediate and six month follow ups.

According to Meys5 (a child psychiatrist in private practice with extensive experience of treating young sex offenders and their families), effective interventions include peer group therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, the social skills approach, group therapy, and multisystemic therapy — including individual, family, and peer relationships.

The intervention was effective in decreasing overactive, oppositional, and aggressive behaviour compared to the control group.

My colleagues and I have focused our research program on parent support of vulnerable groups and have found, through the use of randomized control trials, that systematic interventions directed at parenting behaviours improve parental contingency in low - income parents and in adolescent mothers.12, 13 Similarly, we have found that systematic intervention on family problem - solving behaviour, what Trivette and Dunst call participatory help - giving practice, also improves contingency of parent - child interactions.14

The use of schema therapy informed formulation within sex offender group treatment allows for the expansion of the intervention, helping participants to understand the origins of their offending behaviour in unmet childhood needs and the development of maladaptive offence relate modes of functioning.

Parental behaviour — The ratio of praise to inappropriate commands increased threefold in the intervention group but fell by a third in the controls (table 3).

In the present study, from a developmental perspective young children's behaviour becomes more regulated overall from the toddler to preschool period.17 Families in the intervention group have time to practise and therefore could consolidate new parenting skills from the anticipatory guidance programme over timIn the present study, from a developmental perspective young children's behaviour becomes more regulated overall from the toddler to preschool period.17 Families in the intervention group have time to practise and therefore could consolidate new parenting skills from the anticipatory guidance programme over timin the intervention group have time to practise and therefore could consolidate new parenting skills from the anticipatory guidance programme over time.

MCI Ireland's primary school programme has adapted the principles of the Protective Behaviours programme to deliver to communities or groups that local service agencies identified as in need of intervention.

Compared with the passive control group, those in the intervention group showed significantly better post-training scores on measures of IQ, inhibition, test anxiety and teacher - reported behaviour, attention and emotional symptoms.

Children who have disorganized attachment with their primary attachment figure have been shown to be vulnerable to stress, have problems with regulation and control of negative emotions, and display oppositional, hostile - aggressive behaviours, and coercive styles of interaction.2, 3 They may exhibit low self - esteem, internalizing and externalizing problems in the early school years, poor peer interactions, unusual or bizarre behaviour in the classroom, high teacher ratings of dissociative behaviour and internalizing symptoms in middle childhood, high levels of teacher - rated social and behavioural difficulties in class, low mathematics attainment, and impaired formal operational skills.3 They may show high levels of overall psychopathology at 17 years.3 Disorganized attachment with a primary attachment figure is over-represented in groups of children with clinical problems and those who are victims of maltreatment.1, 2,3 A majority of children with early disorganized attachment with their primary attachment figure during infancy go on to develop significant social and emotional maladjustment and psychopathology.3, 4 Thus, an attachment - based intervention should focus on preventing and / or reducing disorganized attachment.

A recent random assignment intervention study examined whether mothers» responsive behaviours could be facilitated and whether such behaviours would boost young children's learning.6 To also examine the most optimal timing for intervention (e.g. across infancy versus the toddler / preschool period versus both), families from the intervention and non-intervention groups were re-randomized at the end of the infancy phase, to either receive the responsiveness intervention in the toddler / preschool period or not.22 The intervention was designed to facilitate mothers» use of key behaviours that provided affective - emotional support and those that were cognitively responsive, as both types of support were expected to be necessary to promote learning.

Six months later, mothers from the intervention group showed more positive interaction behaviours, and their infants had superior Bailey Mental and Motor scores, as well as more positive interaction behaviours than subjects in the control group [75].