Climate sceptics have gleefully blogged that the emails, now widely published on the internet, reveal extensive data manipulation and expose a conspiracy
behind global warming research.
Not exact matches
Next up, take a look at this exposé of a
global warming skeptic's site that not only makes up fake scientific studies, it also fabricates the scientists and
research institutions
behind them.
«For every ton of CO2 emitted [into] the atmosphere, the natural sinks are removing less carbon than before,» says biologist Josep «Pep» Canadell, executive director of the
Global Carbon Project — an Australia — based research consortium devoted to analyzing the pollution behind global wa
Global Carbon Project — an Australia — based
research consortium devoted to analyzing the pollution
behind global wa
global warming.
Soon is a leading skeptic of the widely accepted science surrounding climate change, In the International Journal of Public Opinion
Research, a study titled «The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change» found that 97 percent of scientists surveyed believed
global warming already is ongoing, with 84 percent of scientists surveyed believing human - produced greenhouse gases were the driving force
behind the change.
The conspiracy
behind the Anthropogenic
Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Angliaâ $ ™ s Climate
Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet.
The conspiracy
behind the Anthropogenic
Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Angliaâ $ ™ s Climate
Research Unit (aka -LSB-...]
Of course it is worth knowing that 97 % of
research papers and / or their authors attribute
global warming to humans but as the video says, it's the science
behind it that counts, and just because the papers are peer reviewed in itself proves nothing about whether the scientific proposal / theory is necessarily right.
On the Geoengineering Watch site, the rationale for the alleged geoengineering is, actually, the real motivation
behind research on SRM — that
global warming is out of control.
«The conspiracy
behind the Anthropogenic
Global Warming myth has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia's Climate
Research Unit and released 61 megabites of confidential files o...
Whether the issue is clinical
research, cancer clusters, or
global warming, corporate interests can hide
behind the credibility of peer - reviewed journals,» says Virginia A. Sharpe, Ph.D., a bioethicist and Director of CSPI's Integrity in Science project which coordinated the initiative.
... by looking at
research on the health impact of tobacco, the «science»
behind global warming or breast implants, or the effectiveness of a drug, we can see that it is not unusual for sponsored academics to fudge the data, suppress unfavourable evidence, and otherwise «torture the numbers till they confess» (9)...
The professor
behind the study is keen to stress that the
research doesn't mean that
global warming is suddenly a really good idea:
I know that the
research behind the
Global Warming scare is flawed.
As a result I didn't take the time to
research the science
behind global warming.