Baupost doesn't go short because unlike going long when you can take advantage of a drop in the value of an undervalued security by just buying more, if your short even though you may be right that it's worth less then the trading price you can still go broke.
Not exact matches
You can
then receive a sum of money
worth slightly
less than the receivables pledged until you've collected the money
is collected from your customers.
Of course, at one point it
was worth asking how a company founded by a
then 19 - year - old could invent a new,
less - invasive way of drawing blood from patients.
If Wind and its 740,000 customers
is valued at about $ 300 million,
then surely Mobilicity and its comparatively piddly 150,000 customers
is worth considerably
less, right?
Heck, you could drive a $ 40,000 BMW and live in a $ 500,000 home, but if you
're $ 600,000 in debt,
then you
're actually
worth less than a 7 - year - old child!
«If you anticipate the kind of huge appreciation in your personal wealth that could come from an IPO or a company sale, the best thing you can do
is transfer stock to your heirs before the sale, because it will
be worth much
less then, and that minimizes the tax liability,» explains Allan Landau, a partner with Boston law firm Sherburne, Powers & Needham.
Meanwhile, if an investor's annual income and net
worth are equal to or more than $ 100,000,
then the individual can invest no more than 10 percent of the
lesser of their annual income or net
worth.
If a potential investor's annual income or net
worth is less than $ 100,000,
then the investor can invest either 5 percent of his or her combined net
worth or a maximum of $ 2,000 in a 12 - month period, whichever
is greater.
But you
're original article appears to say that if you (not the government; «you»
is what you wrote) choose to have one spouse stay at home
then somehow that makes you a «proponent» of the government's approach to taxation and «you believe» women
are worth less.
We'll have more in stocks
then we have today, but we'll
be less exposed, as they'll represent a smaller portion of the growing net
worth.
Mr Conti says it
is also
worth noting that if a mortgage
is required as part of a larger private banking transaction — of more than # 1million —
then the lending criteria mentioned above may
be less applicable and the eventual loan
is underwritten and assessed on a case - by - case basis.
If your assets
are worth more than $ 100,000 or you earn an annual income that exceeds $ 100,000,
then you can only invest 10 percent of the
lesser of your annual income or net
worth.
If both your annual income and your net
worth are equal to or more than $ 100,000,
then during any 12 - month period, you can invest up to 10 % of annual income or net
worth, whichever
is lesser, but not to exceed $ 100,000.
It
's like the Suarez deal... Offer
less than the player
is worth so that the offer gets rejected and
then u can tell everyone that u tried but it didn't work out.
If just scoring points
was the goal,
then there ya go they kick that one to appease you, but the goal
was to win the game and those 3 points at the 3 yard line
were worth much
less than the attempt at getting 7 (or 6 or 8).
If Alexis uses
less energy in the middle and he
is scoring goals
then its
worth giving it a longer try.
Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it
's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing
is going to
be around 220 million or
less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will
be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which
was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank
then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal
worth around 130 million (wether or not it
was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still
be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation
my problem with AW
is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players
are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea
are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we
are the only club that
is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there
is around 100 to 120 million
less outgoings
then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will
be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now
But if Sterling
is worth 50mil pounds
then Ozil should
be worth at least that much — not
less.
With Ike I didn't bother with the goalposts at all, but that
's the luxury of experience — I know it would suck at first,
then suck
less, and
then be worth it in the end.
If you prefer a slightly
less bulky prefold
then the 4 -6-4 ply novice light green edge or intermediate blue edge size
is worth a try.
«If our losses today
are part - payment for every family that
is more secure because of a job we helped create, every person with depression who
is treated with the compassion they deserve, every child who does a little better in school, every apprentice with a long and rewarding career to look forward to, every gay couple who know their love
is worth no
less than everyone else's, and every pensioner with a little more freedom and dignity in retirement,
then I hope our losses can
be endured with a little selfless dignity.»
«If our losses today
are part payment for every child who does a little better in school, every gay couple who know their love
is worth no
less than anyone else's,
then I hope at least our losses can
be endured with a little selfless dignity.
If you feel that a steady mind,
less stress and a more comfortable way of
being is important to you
then the repeated and continued practice will
be worth it.
When you realize your own self -
worth,
then you
are less likely to find yourself in these situations.
But it also seems unlikely that «Real Steel»
was ever going to
be more than that, no matter who sat in the director
's chair; it
's hard to imagine that Spielberg himself would have tackled the material differently, much
less better, since key to its appeal
is playing directly into that melodrama, and
then milking it for everything it
's worth.
Ex Machina doesn't quite pay off,
then, but it
's more or
less worth the trip to the mountains.
If you like the retro style of the Figaro,
then it
is worth seeking out these models too, although they
are actually
less common in the UK.
If you have a particular desire for an automatic
then it
's your only option, but it
's worth bearing in mind that it
's slightly slower and
less efficient than the manual version.
Then again, the advances in e-readers
are coming so hot and fast that it might
be worth my while to hold out for $ 99 or
less.
Shall I send you a copy to scan and see if it
is really
worth bothering — I think it
is but
then I may
be less than objective.
And Lori, here
's my issue with e-books: Publishers can come up with all sorts of reasons why they charge what they do, but if people perceive an e-book as
worth less than a paper book — and people do, for very valid reasons —
then they won't
be willing to pay as much.
If there
's less point in providing usefull writing that people see
worth spending time reading (
be that pirated or paid for)
then could this increase the amount of and audacity of unrealistic promises that offer far more than the former which
are actaully just scams?
This launch price isn't enough to convince me but if the device checks out in my review for Notebookcheck and the price drops to $ 175 or
less then it could
be worth a closer look.
If you put your $ 5,000 into a riskier asset class such as stocks (ie a stock mutual fund)
then in 6 months your investment might
be worth more than $ 5,000 or it could
be worth less than $ 5,000 (possibly a lot
less).
This will probably work best for you if you owe far
less then the value of your home and can handle accepting a lower offer than what you feel it
's truly
worth — due to the currently depressed market.
Then, as now, the «value» part of the markets - a long - term investing approach which focuses on targeting companies which
are valued at
less than their true
worth -
are (relatively speaking) hugely unpopular.
For instance, if the seller won't settle for
less than $ 350,000 and you think the home
is worth $ 340,000,
then add your own incentive.
Think about it this way, if oil will
be worth less in the future
then it should
be worth less now to the people that can store oil so the spot price should go down.
If homes
are worth less than a year ago
then it become tough to refinance unless your current loan balance
is substantially below the current value of your home.
Even
then, the difference over 35 years adds up to
less than 8 % — it
's not
worth worrying about.
If your bond yields 2 %
less than market but matures in a year,
then it
's worth $ 98, but if it matures in 56 years,
then it
's only
worth 0.98 ^ 56 = $ 32.
If DreamWorks values a movie at $ 300 million at release,
then by year three it will
be worth less than $ 30 million on its balance sheet.
If the estate
is worth less than what
is owed,
then the debt owners usually have no recourse for collecting on the debt.
I
'm then left with a property that I have to dump money into every month and may
be worth less than the mortgage I have on it.
Question: You have often said that you look for dollar bills that
are selling for much
less than a dollar,
then you need to have the strength to
be patient and wait for the rest of the world to realize it
is worth a dollar.
While this would mean that the paper value of my investments
are less, and my net
worth is then lower, it would also mean that my new capital goes further by buying larger stakes in the companies I
'm actively purchasing.
If the dollar
is worth 20 %
less in ten years,
then your fixed payment will feel
less because $ 1000 (say) will buy
less in ten years than it will now.
The only reason I
'm still holding on to CLM
is because the 8.01 % yield still makes it
worth holding, but if that yields falls to
less than 5 %
then I will probably dump CLM and invest elsewhere.
If you believe you can pay off your balance quickly (within the limits provided by the program) or if you
're certain you'll
be paying
less in charges over time by using your new card,
then doing the switch will
be worth it.