Thus, we have religious
belief against religious belief and everyone ready to go to war.
Not exact matches
At least 24 of the 34 colleges and universities granted
religious exemptions based on their
beliefs about gender identity also received waivers allowing them to discriminate
against gay and lesbian students and employees, citing faith - based prohibitions
against homosexual sex, the Human Rights Campaign said.
You also ignore the fact that Christians have done just as bad things as those living in the Middle East and those you would call doing the work of the devil: killing those who do not share their faith, using their
religious position to gain wealth and discriminate
against those who have different
beliefs or lifestyles.
It has to do with trying to do with Christians trying to find some grounds to put their
beliefs back into schools.Just ask any supporter of ID education if it is okay if we teach the many other
religious origin ideals in schools besides the Judeo Christian God and I guarantee you they will be
against it.
they are willing to go
against their
religious beliefs to vote for their president.
Personally, I
against any politician who believes his
religious beliefs trump mine.
He can champion equal rights for gay people, even if it goes
against his personal
religious beliefs.
He has made threats, annoyed, pestered and used
religious slurs
against me me because of my
belief in Jesus Christ.
State sanctioned rights must not be influenced by
religious beliefs and a company which uses consumer money to donate to causes that continue to oppress and discriminate
against those we «love» should be exposed.
Do they really imagine that an atheist wants to join their
religious group, hide his / her real
beliefs for months or years, get themselves elected by other members then radically change the whole nature of the club,
against all the other member's wishes?
You and I disagree on a lot of things, but I've said before and I'll say it again, if someone was going to discriminate
against you because of what you believe (unless it was a
religious organization that had different
beliefs) I'd stand with you.
I have nothing
against religion or the
religious, but all I am suggesting is that religion be what it is intended to be: a private
belief, separate from the political and social spheres.
EEOC is trying to make the case that while the vast majority of Jehovah's Witnesses would never accept employment as a gift wrapper continuously wrapping birthday and holiday gifts, their JW Client's personal
religious beliefs allowed her to do so, thus the only legal issue is their client's personal
religious belief against wearing the Santa Hat and Apron.
Religious folks recoil at such notions because it goes
against their
belief that God created them alone to rule over all other creatures.
b) What you've proposed here is not the kind of
religious belief these atheists are railing
against.
As soon as
religious beliefs are no longer used to discriminate
against disliked groups, or to impede science and education, a lot of atheists will probably cease fighting them.
I'm not
religious per se but I agree they shouldn't be required to do something clearly
against their
beliefs.
CNN: Catholics clergymen come out swinging
against HHS regulation Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and abortion as part of preventative care regardless of
religious beliefs.
Hey, blood transfusions are
against some people's
religious beliefs.
To demand a
religious based organizations to provide a service that goes directly
against their theological
beliefs is flat wrong.
We have to go
against our
religious beliefs and provide birth control coverage?
In December the Court of Appeal ruled
against her application that she was discriminated
against in being compelled to perform civil partnership registrations contrary to her
religious beliefs.
One of the reasons that atheists comment here is that
religious beliefs unfortunately impact laws and government policy and our laws.The idiocy of religion unfortunately permeates much of our society, so the more we can fight back and speak out
against religious idiocy, and the more visibly, the better.
Would laws
against murder not apply, since it's a
religious belief?
In September, the Greens filed a lawsuit
against the federal government, stating, «These abortion - causing drugs go
against our faith... We simply can not abandon our
religious beliefs to comply with this mandate.»
The bible is filled with the advocation of violence
against any and all people who disagree with you based on
religious belief.
Conservative xians are squirming and telling «unfair» because the US electorate Is turning
against the imposition of their
religious beliefs through laws affecting people who do not share those
beliefs.
The
religious community's tradition and
belief - system offer ethical guidelines within which (or even
against which) individuals can develop their own functional value hierarchies.
At a time of unprecedented transition in the Christian Movement, when (as George Orwell once put it) «the little orthodoxies of the right and the left vie with one another for possession of our souls,» it is necessary to assert both the modesty and the complex, nuanced character of Christian faith and theology
against the false certainties of true
belief, ideology and
religious simplism.
You may believe the Bible tells you gays should be able to marry or maybe even that blacks should not be able to marry whites (another thing people have used the Bible to protest
against); however, that does not mean that US civil equal rights laws should be based on your personal
religious beliefs.
I find that I can make a more compelling argument
against the pledge of allegiance if I base that argument on political
beliefs as opposed to my
religious beliefs.
When the government refuses to allow things like stem cell research and the many benefits that could come from it because it violates someone's
religious beliefs, then I am
against it.
This does not make only the USA guilty of great wrongs done / there's many nations ruled by tyrants / psychopaths / / those blinded by greed the great injustice by Israel
against palestinians but sums up the horror that nations being capable of committing / heartless acts of inhumanity of cruelity / / based on halfbaked ideas /
beliefs /
religious brainwashing.
The argument
against gay marriage isn't that it has a harmful effect to anyone else but instead that it is
against certain
religious beliefs.
When I have groups who think their
religious beliefs are superior to others»
religious beliefs, then I am
against it.
He is also convinced that a prejudice
against religious belief has distorted modern scholarship and continues to infect academic opinion.
There is a very simple difference — anti-gay people think they can control other people through law by denying them legal rights...pro - gay people understand that
religious people have their rights to believe and worship freely, but not to discriminate
against others via the law based on
religious beliefs.
If a Muslim
religious leader or business leader spoke out
against gay marriage, based on the teachings of the Koran, they wouldn't say a word, but because the CEO of Chick - Fil - A and Billy Graham are Christians and base their
beliefs on the teachings of the New Testament they are unfairly accused of hate speech.
The only thing we argue
against is your right to encode into secular law your
religious beliefs.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation
against Muslims and
against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and
belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non
religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?
Every argument he makes
against religious belief runs up
against a great foggy X-factor called «God» and a useful hedge called «the Fall of Man» and an ace up the sleeve called «grace.»
My Christian
Belief is based upon my Life's Past and does in no way, shape or form come from Chruched based Fundamentalists whom I find as being hypocritical manajeries bent on keeping their family made wealth thru
religious declarations of the wealthy to come he - ll or high waters keep their wealth despite what Christ's teachings do so advise
against!
Wars were fought for the glory and power of nation states rather than for Christianity
against the infidel, or for sectarian
religious beliefs.
Funny, you rail
against «non-traditional»
beliefs and practices and then choose a news outlet to propagate your
religious beliefs.
But even without
religious beliefs, we'd still not all agree on things like that, so here's a more practical reason to argue
against religion:
But if some dude wants to say he's personally spiritual, but not
religious, and isn't trying to cram it down everyone else's throats
against their wills... what's the point in questioning and condemning that choice or
belief system?
There is just as much and as little evidence for and
against religious beliefs as there is for, for example, the big bang, or evolution.
No one gets to mandate another's behavior
against their
religious beliefs.
They face danger not for their
religious beliefs, but for preaching
against the drug trade and the killing in ways that infuriate both gangs and paramilitaries of left and right.
Culture secretary Maria Miller made clear that a «quadruple lock» had been incorporated within the Bill to protect all
religious institutions from having to conduct marriages
against their
beliefs.