At one extreme there are many conservative Christians, both in sects and in the major communions, who, because of
their belief in the authority and inerrancy of Holy Scripture, still look expectantly to a future point in time when the world will come to a sudden end and when, at the Judgment which follows, there will be a general resurrection of all the dead in some bodily form.
This malady seems to be everywhere, but it is surprising to me how common it is among the most conservative of Christians — those who speak often of
their belief in the authority of Bible.
Though some of my fellow church folk may wonder that it could be so, I must affirm that it is
my belief in the authority of Scripture which led me to the schools I attended, to the beliefs I cherish, to the ministry of teaching I enjoy, to the theological method I apply.
Albert Einstein «Blind
belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.»
At the end, when admonishing those that «raised your hands in denial of the truth,» he should have come full circle to remind them that uncritical
belief in authority and consensus has caused the death of over 100 million people.
While Leon was a fake, playing on the Applicant's
belief in his authority as a spiritual leader who could bring him positive benefits, i.e. protection from evil spirits and from prosecution, Leon did nothing to interfere with this Applicant's ability or right to worship, nor did he coerce him to disbelieve or disavow his religious beliefs.
Not exact matches
An important and useful element of the thinking at the time was the replacement of the earlier «control theory» approach to policy (i.e. the
belief that the central point was to find an appropriate spot on the Phillips curve and to stay there), towards a «game theoretic» view,
in which the critical issues related to behaviour — the interaction between the monetary
authorities and the public.
As further exposition of how blind compliance to
authority and the «It Won't Happen to Me»
belief pattern work together to prevent us from taking the protective measures we need to take right now, consider a November 2014 article
in which a financial analyst stated, «it's time to ditch your golden faith, embrace the truth — and make gold a barbaric relic of your portfolio's past.»
If required to do so by law or
in the good faith
belief that such action is appropriate: (a) under applicable law, including laws outside your country of residence; (b) to comply with legal process; (c) to respond to requests from public and government
authorities, including public and government
authorities outside your country of residence; (d) to enforce our terms and conditions; (e) to protect our operations or those of any of our affiliates; (f) to protect our rights, privacy, safety or property, and / or that of our affiliates, you or others; and (g) to allow us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain.
I will leave a fuller defense of Edmund Burke to Yuval Levin, who is an expert on the subject, but Marr badly mischaracterizes Burke as a kind of Deweyan pragmatist and experimentalist, when
in fact Burke believed
in the
authority of tradition and precedent,
in a predisposition toward reverence for the past,
in the notion of God - given rights, and
in the necessity of transcendental
beliefs and institutions as a grounding for political society.
Both of these statements are nothing more than declarations, like so many others often used by Christians, to add the semblance of
authority to a
belief which
in reality has no basis whatsoever.
In this case, if you consider the Talmud / OT an accurate authority you may quote from them to justify your stance, also stating your belief in their doctrine
In this case, if you consider the Talmud / OT an accurate
authority you may quote from them to justify your stance, also stating your
belief in their doctrine
in their doctrines.
They taught me it was ok to challenge
authority, the status quo, even my
belief in God.
And Amnesty International,
in a report released earlier this year, said «repeated calls by the Supreme Leader and other
authorities to combat «false
beliefs» - apparently an allusion to evangelical Christianity, Baha'ism and Sufism - appear to have led to an increase
in religious persecution.»
However, the insult is
in the explicit denial of the authenticity of Christian baptisms, on the basis of the Mormon
belief that the power was lost upon the death of the original apostles, and was restored when they returned as angels and appeared to Joseph Smith, granting him
authority which now resides only within the Mormon organization.
Therefore you contend that
belief in religion based on
authority is rational given everyone else has done it.
It points out that
in Islam no man has
authority over another person's
beliefs, and that only God has
authority to introduce
beliefs and to require or receive worship.
This is so because central to Keen's thought has been his
belief that all theology, including a theological understanding of play, must be defined solely
in terms of one's own autobiography («I may speak of grace only
in the first person») 34 This solipsistic reduction of religious
authority to personal experience has led Keen to characterize incorrectly both theology and the play experience itself.
Neo-fundamentalists believe they alone are remaining true to the fullness of the gospel and orthodox faith while the rest of the evangelical church is
in grave, near - apocalyptic danger of theological drift, moral laxity, and compromise with a postmodern culture — a culture which they see as being characterized by a skepticism towards Enlightenment conceptions of «absolute truth,» a pluralistic blending of diverse
beliefs, values, and cultures, and a suspicion of hierarchies and traditional sources of
authority.
The 1938 report Doctrine
in the Church of England says that «every individual ought to test his or her
belief in practice and, so far as his or her ability and training allow, to think out his or her own
belief and to distinguish between what has been accepted on
authority only and what has been appropriated
in thought or experience».23 Such an emphasis has to allow for variety of
belief and view within the community.
Unfortunately, their
belief in their own righteousness, on their own
authority, gives them a disdain for those who dare disagree.
I have discovered that most atheists claim sole
authority over the realms of science and reason and promote a view that
belief in a creator is incompatible with them.
Chris, however, sees
belief in papal
authority as standing
in direct contradiction to the doctrine of sola scriptura — the Bible alone being the infallible guide for faith and doctrine.
Another aspect of the modern world that concerns all fundamentalists is the loss of
belief in a fundamental
authority undergirding the value system.
Belief in evolution is a necessary component of atheism, pantheism, and all other systems that reject the sovereign
authority of an omnipotent personal God.
It is clear then why the question of biblical
authority is so important to evangelicals:
belief in the infallibility of the Scriptures is the pillar which supports our theology - without it the edifice would surely crumble.
Critical scholarship is supposed to have proven the unscientific nature of
belief in biblical
authority.
Your religion shall change from the mere intellectual
belief in traditional
authority to the actual experience of that living faith which is able to grasp the reality of God and all that relates to the divine spirit of the Father.
You are just another arrogant toad, pretending to have
authority, when
in truth all you have is an emotional attachment to a bronze age
belief system.
It's
belief in a God who dictated the rule of the Bible that gives it any
authority over people today.
But it would require accepting others»
authority, just as your
authority is accepted
in your congregation, to manage their churches
in accordance with their
beliefs and faithful to their understanding.
«Inclusivity,» which
in the context of the new
authority is interpreted as the amalgamation of people with vastly different
beliefs and ways of life, thus becomes not only the method but also the end of
authority's exercise.
In ecclesiastical terms, the very notion of authority, as opposed to domination, requires also the notion of a communion of saints who enjoy a sensus fidelium in respect both to belief and ways of livin
In ecclesiastical terms, the very notion of
authority, as opposed to domination, requires also the notion of a communion of saints who enjoy a sensus fidelium
in respect both to belief and ways of livin
in respect both to
belief and ways of living.
Authority, therefore, does not separate ruler and subject; it rather links them
in a shared bond of fundamental
belief and
in a common form of life.
In both church and state, the extent of the
authority one enjoys as an officeholder is not delimited by
beliefs shared with the people over whom
authority is exercised.
The
authority of office is not one based
in common
belief and life but
in «agreements» and «rights» on the basis of which buffer zones are placed between persons who are not civic friends or brothers and sisters
in the Lord but adversaries with differing interests.
Belief in God requires Christians to affirm «absolutist» truth claims, but such claims are divisive, establish relations of
authority, and encourage rigid distinctions between right and wrong.
Within that tradition, both
in its political and ecclesial expression,
authority is a way of ordering power within a community
in such a way that, at one and the same time, it supports and augments common
beliefs and ways of life and is regularly and harmoniously conjoined with a structure of offices that gives order to the exercise of
authority and power within the particular society
in question.
It would appear that the crisis
in authority we now face has been caused by the dissolution of a common standard of
belief (what used to be called the rule of faith) and a common form of life (what used to be called «the way»).
In this battle, a view which presupposes that it is not only impossible but wrong for
authority to protect and further common
beliefs and ways of life gains increasing control of our imagination, and as it does it erodes the foundations necessary for a church to remain a church.
So prominent has been this debate that outsiders have often regarded evangelicals as holding, not to a distinct view of the sole
authority of Scripture (as was argued
in the previous chapter), but to a
belief in Biblical inerrancy.2
How about a candidate that very correctly holds the Consti.tution as the
authority of this nation (not any religious book) because our founding fathers very deliberately separated church from state
in order to protect the
beliefs of everyone?
One style of faith typical of children but also frequently found among adults is founded upon a deep sense of belonging to a community
in Which faith is expressed through the «heart» and
belief is dependent upon external
authority.
Consequently, Descartes» texts and writings indirectly advance Judeo - Christian
beliefs and traditions
in a manner acceptable to the ecclesiastical
authorities of his time.
@ grassroots: I would like to believe that you were sincere
in claiming that atheists have a ``... duty (as if being responsible to some
authority) to debunk...» (I presume you to mean a
belief in God) ``... via the Internet... [etc]», but when you mix sarcasm with rationality, then you lose creditability with me because you join the ranks of those who just want to poke fun at believers for entertainment and invite a heated argument with no intentions of converting such people.
The Unitarian Universalist church body's Web site upholds a
belief that «personal experience, conscience and reason should be the final
authorities in religion.
Even a test - act that required officeholders to declare «their
belief in the being of a God, and
in the divine
authority of the scriptures,» would not have satisfied, since it is easy to dissemble.
The Pastoral Constitution on the Church
in the Modern World (Gaudium et Spes) calls for openness, yet the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church (Lumen Gentium) strongly affirms traditionally held
beliefs concerning the Church's structure and
authority.
Though critics usually look upon the UUA as a union of unbelief and uncertainty, the church body's Web site upholds a
belief that «personal experience, conscience and reason should be the final
authorities in religion.»
Being is the doctrine that «everything stands still,» a fateful doctrine resting only on
belief in philosophical and theological
authorities, not on the nature of reality (TSZ 218f.).