So for example, I admit the facts but I was not dishonest because I wanted to save co-workers from redundancy and my honest
belief about that evil is buttressed by a report by Professor X.
Not exact matches
what you believe is not «biblically based», it's indoctrination
about ideas that came from warping and exagerating ideas that existed in «pagan» (not actually the correct term but good for this purpose) mythologies, and the
evil imaginations of men like Dante and those who desired to see those they considered inferior in doctrine,
belief, religion or culture in torture.
We interviewed Scott Derrickson in our latest issue and the movie explores many of Derrickson's own
beliefs about the nature of good and
evil.
It's silly) And since the
belief and the book can be used to justify
evil actions, then it's really
about how YOU interpret the
belief, because others can interpret it in a completely different way and act «immoral» by their exegesis.
Fear and hatred of the body and ambiguous
beliefs and feelings
about sexuality produced negative views of women, another instance of men experiencing «
evil» but projecting it elsewhere.
This
belief, says Noddings, explains why women haven't been heard in the moral debate
about evil (to enter it they would have to become «conscious»).
How can a «Good Christian» gun down a doctor at an abortion clinic because the doctor went against their ideals and that's a grey fuzzy area but when a follower of Islam kills someone when outraged
about their own
beliefs, it's pure
evil?
So when your talking
about Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc. it wasn't their atheism that made them do the
evil things they did any more than say their lack in the
belief in unicorns.
For the great majority of Americans, moral discourse —
beliefs about right and wrong, good and
evil — is shaped and carried by the biblical tradition.
If you approve of planes flying into buildings, dressing women in cloth bags, denying stem cell research, discrimination against women, gays and anyone with alternate
beliefs, denying contraception to people who can't afford families, picketing soldiers funerals, etc, etc, then keep your fuzzy mindset
about good and
evil.
If the dispute is
about values, some of the evidence will include
beliefs about good and
evil that are not going to be accepted by those who have fundamental disagreements with your values in the first place.
Provine blamed the scientific establishment itself for misleading the public
about the absolute incompatibility of contemporary Darwinism with any
belief in God, designing forces, or absolute standards of good and
evil.
its 1 thing 2 b gay and hide it its another 2 speak
evil about being gay and its another 2 conceal the fact u r gay own up u crook eddie long is a closet gay man that goes against his
beliefs its a money grab from people who believe in god and religion
I do not think it silly to point out that, whatever their differences, Yoder and Niebuhr do share a
belief that the life and work of Jesus Christ teaches us that there is something
evil about all acts of force, regardless of the goals or intentions of those acts.
I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to
belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks
about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «
evil» or «good».
I guess that my
belief about government playing a part in providing social justice is partly due to the fact that according to Paul, government is «ordained by God» (Romans 13:2) to promote justice, restrain
evil, and protect the people under its care (Romans 13:3 - 4).
Fantasies
about Western democracies fighting back against their murderous Middle Eastern enemies don't come much more blunt - force than this, with its eye - for - an - eye ethos summed up by its
evil villain's
belief that «vengeance must always be profound and absolute.»
We all have
beliefs about good and
evil, moral and immoral, sin and punishment and redemption and all of those things.
Christian Word Search Pack Adam and Eve Archbishop Oscar Romero Bernadette Soubirous Christian
Beliefs About God Christian
Beliefs About Good and
Evil Easter Jesus Word Nick Vujic Mary Magdalene Maximillian Kolbe Mother Teresa Noah's Ark Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Saint Paul Saint Patrick's Day The Conversion of Saul The Crucifixion of Jesus The Good Samaritan The Holy Trinity The Lord's Prayer The Nicene Creed The Parable of Talents The Prodigal (Lost) Son The Ten Commandments
You could use this as a lead up to the problem of
evil and
beliefs about God.