We must base
our beliefs on scripture, not experience.
Not exact matches
In one response you have referred to me as silly, accused me of being unable to reconcile my
beliefs to
scripture, accused me of stalling, rambling
on and
on, (love the irony in this one... grin), likened me to a tween, insinuated I do not know or rightly divide
scripture, referred to me as sensitive, and implied my post was immature.
Are you really surprised at
scriptures quoted
on the
BELIEF BLOG?
Mormon
beliefs are no secret; all teachings, lessons,
scripture are available free
on the internet at lds.org and mormon.org.
Again, other Christians do this with our favorite
beliefs: We'll claim our views are wholly based
on scripture, but in fact our favorite proof - texts are cherry - picked, and least - favorites are dismissed, wholly based
on our theology.
Or is the real idolatry to hold
on to
beliefs without examining them critically in light of
Scripture?
«Their insistence that
scripture contains all things necessary for salvation,» he writes, «was part of their protest against the Roman insistence
on belief in dogmas like transubstantiation [and the perpetual virginity of Mary] as necessary articles of faith.
From the novelist as well as from the stories in
Scripture the theologian should take courage to concentrate
on the experience of coming to
belief, not
on the «
beliefs» themselves (the sedimentation of experiences of coming to
belief).
While there was a certain security to having this infallible roadmap
on my nightstand, there was also a deep fear that came along with my
belief that if just one thing was out of place in
Scripture, if just one thing didn't resolve, the whole thing would fall apart.
The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen as an attack
on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general
belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of
Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.
But I believe he's been taught by his pastor father the old school teachings
on tithing and other
beliefs so much that he hasn't seen the truth in
Scripture.
Your claim that things supported by
scripture is based
on your
belief that the bible is the inerrant, infallible word of god, which is your opinion.
And then we interpret the
Scripture based
on this wrong
belief that it was written by a later author with a different audience and for different reasons.
One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion
on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very
scriptures they they base their
beliefs on.
In a poll taken by Christianity Today in 1957, for example, among members of the Protestant clergy who chose to call themselves conservative or fundamental, 48 % affirmed that
belief in
Scripture's inspiration also demanded a commitment to its inerrancy, while 52 % said they were either unsure of the doctrine of inerrancy or rejected it outright.1 Discussion within evangelicalism concerning the inspiration of
Scripture has usually focused
on this point: whether or not
Scripture is inerrant.
I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my
belief is something that combines the
belief of
Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you
on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)
Dave, to the best of my ability, my
beliefs are based
on Scripture.
If the Easter faith is understood primarily as the conviction of the exaltation of the crucified Jesus to be Lord and Savior, it is possible to understand how it could have arisen among the dispirited disciples as their response to the «offence» of the crucifixion of their Master, while they wrestled with that problem in the light of the impact made
on them by the life and teaching of Jesus, and in the light of their study of the
scriptures, of their current convictions about similar figures and of their
belief about God.
One can lay out all the evidence and build (and have built) an airtight case against every single religion
on Earth past and present, but still believers will not budge from their point of view, even when presented with the lies and contradictions in the very
scriptures they base their
beliefs on.
Almost every article
on Sunday's CNN «
Belief» section is spiritually ridiculous and does not line up with
scripture.
When there is a such a wide array of opinions and
beliefs on what a particular passage means, and there is very little chance for the average student of
Scripture to gain clarity or certainty
on which view is right, most people think «Why even try?»
They are often crudely portrayed as voting based solely
on identity politics, born suckers for quotes from
Scripture or «code words» laced in the speeches of candidates appealing to their spiritual
beliefs.
@ Bruce «A couple of things about
belief and evidence for
belief from the
scriptures: (1) the gospel of John encourages us to believe based
on the testimony of others who were «eyewitnesses» to key events»
If you have abundant personal evidence then this shouldn't offend you; this attacks the
belief of god that is based merely
on scripture, not a
belief gained through personal experience
It is hard to say whether there will be a single coalescing theological re-interpretation of
scripture that is more palatable and catches
on or a continued diversification and splintering of
belief.
Fundamentalism has been characterized by (1) vigorous resistance to developments in the world of science that appeared to contradict the Biblical text; (2) Biblical literalism; (3) individualism; (4) moralism; and (5) insistence
on belief in certain «fundamentals» such as the inerrancy of the
Scriptures, the virgin birth of Jesus Christ, and his second coming.
On the contrary, Nicene Christianity has again and again explored these very questions of the right relationship between
belief and trust, personal integrity and communal commitment, canonical
scripture and other sources of spiritual insight.
Your comments regarding your wild and exaggerated
belief that God was somehow confused
on what he created in «Adam then Eve» as male and female and that the bible can be interpreted in any way you choose reminds me of some
scripture that you (being a scholar and former pastor?)
Those who use a «theistic» compass, for instance, base moral decisions and perspectives
on religious
belief scripture, the teaching of a religious group, or the prevailing norms of a believing community.
You wrote: «if you have ever had concerns about «going down the slippery slope» by giving up the
belief in the inspiration or inerrancy of
Scripture, this book is an excellent source to see how someone can abandon these and still hold
on to their faith.»
Again, Jeremy's words: ««if you have ever had concerns about «going down the slippery slope» by giving up the
belief in the inspiration or inerrancy of
Scripture, this book is an excellent source to see how someone can abandon these and still hold
on to their faith.
All Year: The Bible (There are many translations available at biblegateway.com)- Anchor Bible Commentary Series - The Women's Bible Commentary, Edited by Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe - Living Judaism: The Guide to Jewish
Belief, Tradition, and Practice by Wayne D. Dosick - Women in
Scripture: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical books, and the New Testament, Edited by Carol Meyers, Toni Cravien, and Ross Shepard Kraemer - Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem - Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity Without Hierarchy, Edited by Ronald W. Pierce, Rebecca Merrill Groothuis and Gordon D. Fee - Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life by Lynn Cohick - God's Word to Women by Katharine C. Bushnell - Don't Know Much About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know About the Good Book but Never Learned by Kenneth C. Davis - «
On The Dignity and Vocation of Women» by Pope John Paul II - The Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs
Even though, as physicist Steven Weinberg has emphasized, most people who call themselves religious tend to adhere to only those bits and pieces from
scripture that appeal to them, by according undue respect for ancient religious
beliefs in general, we nonetheless are suggesting that they are
on par with conclusions that have been drawn from centuries of rational empirical investigation.
Though religion comes muted in True Grit, the film clearly aligns Mattie's thirst for justice with her
belief in God, something underscored by Mattie's quoting of
scripture but also by Carter Burwell's music, which borrows heavily from the traditional American hymn «Leaning
On The Everlasting Arms.»
An introduction to Christian theology as a coherent system of
beliefs founded
on the sovereignty of God and the infallibility of
Scripture.
Christian family therapy usually draws
on the wisdom of the Biblical
scriptures to help repair family relationships in a manner consistent with Christian religious
beliefs and teachings.
As some previous research has measured religiosity
on a one - dimensional level, such as church attendance (e.g., Kunz & Albrecht, 1977; Wallin, 1957; Wilson & Musick, 1996), the current research employs a multidimensional assessment of religiosity, including intrinsic, extrinsic, and quest, as well as church attendance, and the degree to which respondents endorse the
belief system presented in the
scripture of their faith.