Not exact matches
That not everyone recognizes this
absolute for what it is changes nothing; psychologically speaking, a «subjective
absolute» fulfills exactly the same function
as absolute truth does for those who
believe in a revealed religion.»
Neo-fundamentalists
believe they alone are remaining true to the fullness of the gospel and orthodox faith while the rest of the evangelical church is in grave, near - apocalyptic danger of theological drift, moral laxity, and compromise with a postmodern culture — a culture which they see
as being characterized by a skepticism towards Enlightenment conceptions of «
absolute truth,» a pluralistic blending of diverse beliefs, values, and cultures, and a suspicion of hierarchies and traditional sources of authority.
Without an «
Absolute Source» of truth, there is no absolute truth, yet you argue herein as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that ther
Absolute Source» of
truth, there is no
absolute truth, yet you argue herein as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that ther
absolute truth, yet you argue herein
as if there must be, and you want us to «
believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that there isn't.
Whereas the moderns
believed in «
truth» so long
as it could be scientifically verified, the post-moderns have given up on
truth altogether and eschew belief in any kind of
absolute.
As I had mentioned in my previous comment, I am one of those people who
believes in
absolute truth.
Jeremy and Glenn — I don't think that Brian would say he doesn't
believe in
absolute truth — I could be wrong but I think he would say something like... he doesn't
believe that any human has (at least up to this point) been able to know
absolute truth and that he
believes there is a lot more of
absolute truth to be known and that he doesn't
believe that it is
as narrow or «little»
as so many try to make it.
Or, let me re-phrase this
as a question: What does someone like Brian McLaren have to offer someone like me who
believes that there is
absolute truth?
Green was allowed to make the unopposed penultimate point suggesting that just
as religious dictatorial fundamentalism and theocracy are causing «enormous violence» around the world hierarchical Churches
believing in «one fundamental and
absolute truth» are places where child abuse flourishes.
and also, googling information on the internet is not the same
as finding it in the Scripture, though their is alot of good information giving knowledge on the Bible, it is not to be replaced with going to God's Word for
truth, i still cant
believe you are claiming to be a christian and you also claim that the Bible is not a Holy instrument of God, and that Paul speaks things that arent
absolute truth, this is nonsense to any child of God.