BPL: What
you believe changes reality not a white.
Not exact matches
If physics proves right about the nature of
reality itself (and the concept the universe is a simulation), you're short -
changing yourself by not
believing in a loving high intelligence.
I
believe someone referred to Michael Polanyi who
changed the way modern scientists had been trained to think by pointing out the obvious
reality that the experimenter was always part of the experiment.
Dunk If God wanted us to
believe in him he would
change reality (make a miracle, or sign) to facilitate that, right?
Refusing to
believe and / or acknowledge the evidence does not
change the
reality of the truth.
Why
believe in real truth - that actually confronts the deep multiplicity of what it means to be human, and actually
change your life - when you can
believe in your own shallow truth that simply adds to one's self - justification and denial of
reality, and remain the way you are?
I agree,
believe what you will, however that doesn't
change reality (except in the persons mind) and as you said nor should it be imposed on others.
I don't have to have faith in this statement because I know it to be fact, and you can choose to
believe me or not, but it does not
change the
reality.
Keep on
believing all you want, but
reality is you will live a little longer, you will die, you will rot and you will be forgotten, and no Bronze Age fairy tales will ever
change that.
PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only
change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire
reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT
believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to
believe... but Your belief in God does not
change whether or not he exists you will be judged.
He still
believes in his transfer strategy that worked for him in the 90s and early 2000s but he has failed to realize that times have
changed and what worked back in the day works no more under current market
realities and thats the reason he seconds guesses, delays, waits for the final hour hoping to get some quality for bargain prices and when he doesn't he settles for, according to him the» strong squad we currently have».
Instead, out of fear of not selling enough shirts and tickets, they allowed us all to
believe that our «cycle of
change» included both keeping Sancez and Ozil as well as spending lots of money, where in
reality it was one or the other.
Also deep in his core he does not want to
change, he
believes in himself and he is stubborn,
reality check, he is there to stay, AW and only AW will decide when to leave ARSENAL; on his behalf he still manages to achieve the same feats year after year, due to an equal share of his prowess as a coach, yes we win to lesser teams, but also because of the weaknesses of his adversaries, we are closing on Man City and Chelski because they are playing like sheet and loosing points, the same for Pool, MANURE and SOTON.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in
reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you
believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and
change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I
believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has
changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
You can refuse to
believe it, but I don't think that
changes the
reality that Americans are terrible at budgeting and great at overspending and accumulating debt.
They all meant well, but the
reality was that I don't
believe any of them saw me more than once, with shift
changes and a weekend (Sunday into monday) birth.
The
realities of today's fast -
changing world have finally caught up with the UK, Hague
believes.
We
believe that there are policy
changes which could play a role in supporting asylum - seeking torture survivors and refugees in coping with the
reality of loneliness.
«Now it is up to us who
believe in these
changes to help make them a
reality.»
The researchers
believe the shock many felt upon seeing the
reality of their actions versus their perceptions primed them to
change their behavior.
The take - home message is that those parts of «
reality» that are simply our human constructions — «objects» such that «if everyone stopped
believing in them, they would cease to exist» — serve as obstacles preventing us from dealing with the actual
realities of climate
change, biodiversity loss, and other human - generated threats to our continued existence.
It is often
believed that doing the same exercises repetitively will give you the results you desire, when in
reality, you should consistently be
changing up your workouts.
Denying
reality is NOT going to
change it, nor is choosing what you
believe based on what suits your likes and dislikes and trying to pass it off as fact.
That
reality changed since visit and best to maintain free hiv dating sites positive people a certain level of feng shui, are
believed be.
Learned helplessness, the trainers taught me, is often accepted as a
reality when we
believe we can not
change the likelihood of something bad happening, even if it's not true.
Freire asserted that critical awareness was not simply an end in itself but a form of consciousness
believed to have the ability to
change the symbolic and material
realities of teachers and students (Freire, 1972).
Valuation - Informed Indexers
believe that long - term price
changes can be predicted because investor emotion is the primary influence on stock prices in the short term and the economic
realities are the primary influence in the long term.
OMFG!!!!!!!!!! I can't
believe ma eyes, I had tears of joy while watching that trailer.I thought this would simply be the original 3 games as they are with PS1 graphics but miraculously in 1080p playable on PS4, I can not
believe you guys are truly «remastering» them, holy crap it looks gorgeous.I can not
believe you guys are using all the original things... original designs of characters, original geometry, I literally thought this was impossible to happen in this
reality, cuz all devs to this day messed up in remastering old games, they always
change things and mess up... but you guys are like, its like y ’ all read ma mind and made exactly what I wanted.This is a true «remaster» and every single dev out there that wants to remaster something should learn from this.
In 2009 Victoria Donohue wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer, «In these works it's still possible to
believe that aesthetic presence might have some impact on the hard
reality of everyday existence», and in 2011 she wrote: «Her landscapes have a simplify and power; Their intensity of focus on feeling and seasonal
changes (are) ambitious exercises in reconciling geometry and gesture...»
Believing that art can impart
change, Althamer reimagines
reality in an attempt to subtly provoke the social, political, and psychological perceptions.
But that's partly because they're severely misreading their constituent's views on climate
change, which are in
reality much more pro-action than they
believe.
And no one
believes Bush's intentions here have anything to do with achieving meaningful cuts or addressing the
reality of climate
change.
Your reading of my work as neutral on the question of anthropogenic climate
change — and the need for a big response / / j.mp / eQuest — is so divorced from
reality that it's hard to
believe you read anything I write, or have written, in covering this issue since the mid 1980s.
Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection spent over $ 300 million to promote «consensus messaging,» which was featured in Gore's 2006 movie Inconvenient Truth (no doubt the organization gave a $ 1 million to an advertising agency, which conducted a focus group to validate its seat - of - the - pants guess that «reframing» the organization's name as «Climate
Reality» would convince farmers to «
believe in» climate
change).
In an approach that many
believe is more realistic and sustainable than the top - down methods pursued by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC), the regional efforts are evolving with regional
realities in mind.
For those who
believe we must embrace low - emissions technology (i.e. all of us who recognize the
reality of anthropogenic climate
change) the manifesto is oddly selective, dismissing many large - scale renewable energy technologies (especially wind power and biomass), and taking a skeptical view of solar energy's potential.
Bast and Spencer are motivated to debunk the 97 percent «myth» because they have a vested interest, via their affiliation with Heartland, in getting the public to
believe that the scientists are a lot less certain about the
reality of man - made climate
change than they actually are.
I
believe the most of the hysteria about climate
change will eventually subside when
reality refuses to conform to model projections.
So I, a person who
believes climate
change is a
reality, find your credibility as an «expert» undermined with me.
The proportion of adults who
believe climate
change is «definitely» a
reality dropped by 30 % over the last year, from 44 % to 31 %, in the latest survey by Ipsos Mori.
My understanding at that point, which I
believe was coming to be more widely shared, both inside and outside the program, was that the Administration was uncomfortable with the mainstream scientifically based communications suggesting the
reality of human - induced climate
change and the likelihood of adverse consequences.
However, I
believe that
change will only come as the years pass and the failed predictions multiply to the point where their credibility is shattered by the pleasant
reality that global warming is absolutely nothing to worry about.
So Trenberth wants to put the burden of proof on those that
believe the null hypothesis is a better explanation of
reality than the H1 hypothesis AGWers push, that man - made GHG emissions will cause catastrophic climate
change.
Bit by bit, some
reality appears to be intruding into the make
believe world of the Climate
Change Act:
Perhaps Oliver was simply speaking to (and / or on behalf of) his base — only 60 per cent of Conservatives
believe climate
change is a
reality, compared to 88 per cent of Liberals and 92 per cent of New Democrats.
In any case, just because a majority of people «
believe» in something, does not
change reality.
Even in the face of Hurricane Sandy and more severe firestorms, the rapid loss of species, massive deforestation, and the melting glaciers and poles, most people still don't take climate
change seriously enough to
believe that these emergent
realities ought to
change human behavior.
The
changes made by PHIUS are more extensive and, I
believe, more suitable to the
realities of construction in North America.
I
believe there's been a substantial
change in the mainstream media in recent years ending the false balance between
reality and denial on climate discussions.
While might be entertaining to watch Bill Nye and others discuss climate
change / global warming / vanishing arctic ice with those who choose to
believe in alternate
realities, an unfortunate primary consequence is the illusion that there is any room for «Debate» on basic presumptions.