Not exact matches
We're asked to accept, for example, that it's safe to eat food containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) because, the experts point out, there's no evidence that it isn't and no reason to
believe that altering genes precisely in a lab is more
dangerous than altering them wholesale through traditional
breeding.
Other
breeds tend to be possessive of what they
believe is theirs and this can lead to a
dangerous situation if you have young infants.
In addition to educational programs within the community, Love - A-Bull also
believes that
dangerous dog laws should be focused on the actions or inaction of the owner, rather than on the
breed of the dog.
Some people mistakenly
believe that owners of these so - called «
dangerous»
breeds do not care about public safety because they object so strongly to BSL.
The remainder (42 %) support the
believe that particular
breeds «are inherently more aggressive and
dangerous».
Do you
believe banning certain
breeds of dog will put a halt to issues / problems associated with
dangerous dogs?
Sadly, some
breeds of dogs, like pit bull terriers, are often misunderstood and
believed to be
dangerous.
In general, most people
believe them to be
dangerous dogs, even when there are
breeds that are genetically far more aggressive and «more
dangerous» than Pit Bulls based on incidences of dog bites (such as Rottweilers, for example).
ANIMALS 24 - 7 also
believes that few if any dogs should ever be killed because of aggression issues, but with the caveat that dogs of
dangerous lineage should never be
bred, so as not to be born in the first place.
Some council members
believe it makes more sense to have a ban on
dangerous animals rather than a
breed specific ban.
The OHS
believes breed - specific bans are not a very effective way to protect the public from aggressive or
dangerous animals.
While some
believe only specific types of dog
breeds are the
dangerous biters, every dog is a risk, even with no prior history of aggressive behavior.
-- «In fact, there are many reasons to
believe that lengthening prison sentences actually makes society less safe in the long run by creating custodial
breeding zones in which criminals network and reinforce their anti-social tendencies only to be released into society more
dangerous than they were when they went in.»
Owning a «
dangerous breed» makes insurance carriers leery because they
believe it's more a matter of «when» the dog will attack rather than «if», according to Howard Bergstein, president of independent insurance agency, Erich Courant & Co..