Sentences with phrase «believe human understanding»
Why do you believe human understanding is the ultimate?
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
Business owners who don't believe in the critical importance of branding, he adds, fail to understand basic human behaviour.
We believed that the relationship between natural capital, or what nature provides for free, and production could be understood only if the corporations and foundations that focused on development embraced the idea that nature and human well - being are inseparable.
The company believes that such cooperation will accelerate the development of the technology and ultimately lead to computers that can understand human speech without failing.
I believe you'll even see us understand the human brain.
And I believe understanding this element of human nature — which I'll discuss in the next section — is key to building a life that: a) involves ambitious striving toward goals and having impact in the world, which contributes to a sense of meaning, and b) gives you a shot at realizing true happiness by avoiding a soul - sucking competitive rat race.
Sally Jansen, Actually not ALL people inherently believe in a creator, though t is a common human belief that the world around them came from something outside of its own understanding.
«A full reading of Bernstein's email reveals an important point ---- his assertion that, in the 1980s, we never denied the possible role of human activity as a cause for climate change, and he further makes clear that, at that point in time, there was a great deal of uncertainty and lack of understanding of climate change, even among leading scientists and experts,» said Keil, adding that today, Exxon «believes the risk of climate change is clear, and warrants action.»
The accommodations that some seek for religious communities that have a radically different understanding of human flourishing are, she believes, incompatible with pluralism.
This is the extreme call of faith ~ that despite ALL appearances we CHOOSE to believe in a God that loves us and provides for all his creation regardless of what that does or does not look like to our human understanding.
I will never understand why someone who does not believe in a God must always vehemently attack those who do, as if it were an affront to them as a human.
I do find it hard to believe that God the Father would welcome Judas into Heaven with a «Your work is done» - type welcome, but I am looking at it with my human mind, which is perhaps incapable on any level this side of Heaven to understand the limitless love of God and Jesus Christ.
martinpaul i tend to think that religion only understands the human condition in terms of which god you believe in.
I suffered a terrible car accident... during 3 weeks I almost died «many times»... Now I can read a beautiful article like this one and agree with it... Believe me... no matter your faith, your fortune or whatever you may be involved with... on the face of death if you are human you will only care about your loved ones... you will remember about the moments you were happy together and dream they happen again... you will remember your childhood like you were 7 again... you will ask forgiveness and try to show your love, no matter how hard you are... In the face of death we realize that nothing more then our family matters... For the professor, once his life of arrogance reaches an end, he will then understand what is the meaning of family...
people really need to study the bible — not for Christianity sake but for theirs - the athiest would like everyone to understand them and used this phrase — But when I explain that atheism is central to my worldview — that I am in awe of the natural world and that I believe it is up to human beings, instead of a divine force, to strive to address our problems — they often better understand my views, even if we don't agree.
Instead of misappropriating celebrity death as a gospel opportunity, I believe we should use it to demonstrate that we understand and relate, not to our culture, but to human beings.
But I believe we as humans can understand it one day by being curious.
Becuase the more one learns of science and nature, the clearer it is that there is no reason to believe in god and the more one learns of human nature, the more one understands why millions of us still do.
Since those process categories have been connected with ideas of God inspired by the Bible, process theologians believe there is a chance in the twenty - first century to bring the long separated parts of human understanding into a new, coherent relationship.
your brain is relatvely soo simple and therefore its comprehension is also very limited, you believe in evolution so religion itself is an evolutionary process.Even atheism also evolved, The arguments today is just part of the evolutionary process of change through dialectecal methods.The moment humans begin to understand and appreciate the dialectics then the solution to the problems argued is near.
But behind Lincoln's understanding of history was his idea of a God «who at times seems to want to frustrate the Statesman» (John Diggins, The Lost Soul of American Politics [Basic, 1984]-RRB- Lincoln «doubted that man could ever grasp God's will and therefore believed that human action would always be estranged from divine intention» (p. 330) Lincoln divined that God is both hidden and revealed.
your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.
@ Reema, Do you also believe that the Qur» an is a truth that is filtered through Human interpretation and understanding?
When correctly understood, these principles of obligation help Christians discern what they should do and lead them in both actualizing and mediating between various tendencies and needs (the third level) which Christians believe are essential for human existence.
anyone who thinks hitler is a good man should and i TRULY BELIEVE THIS, should be put thru ALL the things hitler put HUMANS thru, as a princible to understand there warped beliefs!
If metaphysics is defined as the human intellect's self - understanding, then metaphysics comprises contingent as well as necessary truths — although even the contingent truths it comprises are such that in one sense they can not be coherently denied and, therefore, must be believed, if only implicitly or nonreflectively..
Darwin's famous scientific theory is anything but a small, insightful, steppingstone to understanding the reality that humans, (wither they believe in it or not), exist in.
Believe in God is not solely found in intellect (although if at least little intellect isn't used it turns kinda silly) at it's core it is a spirit thing that surpasses human communication and imposable to believe or understand unless experBelieve in God is not solely found in intellect (although if at least little intellect isn't used it turns kinda silly) at it's core it is a spirit thing that surpasses human communication and imposable to believe or understand unless experbelieve or understand unless experienced.
I believe they would argue that its development results from the innate human desire to «explain» and «understand» the natural world around us.
Most sociologists believe that evolutionary biology is crucial for understanding the many social insti.tutions of the human species, of which religion is only one.
Not a single thing in the entire universe can claim eternal life, and yet for some reason many humans refuse to understand this and believe they get to live on for eternity.
Christians, on the other hand, believe that God desires to reveal himself, and would contend that the fact that humans are made in the image of God (Gen. 1:27), even if fallen, provides some basis for some understanding of his character.
The more you came to understand the Universe, the less reason there was to believe in a god and the more you came to understand human nature, the more you understood why billions of us still do.
«Everyday life ceases to appear as something manipulated by vast, mysterious forces beyond human control or understanding and becomes a world that is manipulable, predictable, and intelligible... When you can get by happily enough without God, even if you do believe in him, why bother with him at all?»
I believe that he can, and it is my purpose in this paper to suggest the way in which his thought helps us to understand the basic motives which impel human beings to violence.
One may understand the personality of God as His act — it is, indeed, even permissible for the believer to believe that God became a person for love of him, because in our human mode of existence the only reciprocal relation with us that exists is a personal one.
Niebuhr, taking the doctrine of original sin seriously but not literally, believed that the biblical image of man conveyed a deeper understanding of the human situation than any alternate scheme.
He believes Paul's statements regarding female subordination can best be understood by recognizing «the human as well as the divine quality of Scripture.»
The German - American thinker Paul Tillich, who died only a few years ago, believed that the Christian faith could only be rightly understood when it was recognized as providing the «answer» — not of course in words or propositions but in the reality which is behind such statements — to the «problems» which are posed by human existence as such.
I also believe that all human understanding and experience of it is relative.
Writes Dark, «It is only when we're blessed by a feeling of finitude that we can begin to perceive the holy, that sense of a whole before which our limited understanding is dwarfed... Only a twisted, unimaginative mind - set resists awe in favor of self - satisfied certainty... More humility might characterize our talk of God if we believe that the whole truth can never be entirely ours and that our attempts to nail God down are always well - intentioned human constructs at best and idols at worst.»
But he believes that such images and concepts can acquire fresh meaning if considered in terms of the Whiteheadian understanding of Jesus as our model of what it means to overcome the common divergence that we as humans experience between that course of action which God presents to us and that course of action we find ourselves naturally wanting to follow (104).
I can never understand how any intelligent human being can possibly believe such crap.
Nevertheless, I believe that this basic motif of seeking maximizing enjoyments provides a key to understanding the final goal of all human moral action.
I believe that the three days has a relevance on which there are lots of debates and understanding... i feel that and understand that Jesus died as a son of man (human), and rose up as a Son of God (God Himself).
The figure of Don Juan is an imaginative impossibility in our time because he comes from a period in which the human being was understood not merely as a biological machine, generated randomly out of the incessant flux of an aleatory universe, but as a radiant and terrible enigma, dangerously and daringly poised between beast and angel, hell and heaven, the elemental abyss and the infinite God: a period in which it was still just possible to believe that human freedom was not merely the all - but - illusory residue of a random confluence of mindless physical forces and organic mechanisms, but a glimpse of the transcendent within the world of matter.
Like Jonathan Edwards, a theologian he admired (and about whom he writes in this volume), Niebuhr believed that human beings can be understood only in relation to God's glory.
A finely tuned sensitivity to human need and suffering may be a sufficient guide to action for the optimist who believes that the state can make everybody happy, but the realist who understands that every state rests on power and coercion is the one who most needs an ideal of power guided by justice.
However, I believe that if we seek to understand why Paul saw homosexual acts as radically contrary to God's design for human sexuality, we will come to understand both the Gospel itself — and that design — much more deeply.
Once we can discuss these things like rational human beings, I believe we will get to better understand one another... and actually like one another... and be more willing to discuss these differences in less violent ways.