Please come up with a more compelling reason to
believe in a deity other than «he's gonna kill you if you don't».
Not exact matches
So true, JohnQuest, but
believing in a moral
deity that allows you to oppress for gain while you measure
others by a stricter standard seems elitist and vain, doesn't it?
Ya, that's why we need to start running candidates who do not
believe in the Christian
deity or any
other mythological
deity.
Furthermore, there is certainly enough evidence
in the discrepant personalities of the OT v. NT
deity to indicate a «changing nature,» i.e., one who sees no
other option but to destroy humanity and then later destroy entire civilizations as opposed to one who prefers the option of alleged self - sacrifice coupled to a merciful «grace» for those who are willing to just
believe in the sacrifice.
And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are
other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed
in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they
believe that they all come via
deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who
believe in the biblical teachings
believe that through time they are more complete than those of
other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and
other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.
As an atheist who
believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and
believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if
believing in a
deity makes a person treat
other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.
so therefore just as much a religion as one that
believes in a
deity and tries to get
others to
believe the same.
If they
believe in some
other deity, then you should respect their beliefs and leave them alone.
If your
deity is into being decent to
others, then maybe he's really a Buddhist, a religion that
believes in decency instead of fear.
You know, it really makes no sense to (on the one hand) condemn the Bible as anhistoric, and (on the
other hand) condemn the
deity believed in as a brutal butcher.
This
deity and two
others associated with him
in the opening section, says Dr. Holtom, furnish the basis of a claim by some nineteenth and twentieth century Shinto scholars that Shinto
believes in a trinitarian monotheism.
Because they chose to
believe in a Bronze Aged God, who was fashioned from no fewer than 12
other deities?
«Seventy - five years ago evangelical leader J. Gresham Machen observed that Bible -
believing Protestants and faithful Roman Catholics shared more
in common with one another than they did with
others who denied the
deity of Christ, the miracles of Jesus, the Holy Trinity, or the second coming of Christ.
What I don't get is, if they don't
believe in a god,
deity or nature spirits what does it matter to them if
others do and why must they get so riled up about it like some sort of vendetta?
While you may not
believe in God, the man named Jesus, or any
other deity, there is
in fact, historical evidence pointing at least to the possibility of the existence of the man named Jesus and that many, many people were willing to change their lives, risk their lives and even be persecuted and executed
in the name of this man named Jesus.
All things are possible with atheism, though if you actually
believe in a
deity as you pray then you would no longer be considered an atheist, so you would follow the strictures of whatever
other group you would then fall into.
If you
believe otherwise, you are (by default), stating that your
deity is,
in fact
in favor of a special and elevated group of individuals (such as yourself and your favorite authors) who can and should control
others faith by virtue of their special understanding of this god and his «inspired» word.
On the
other hand those of us that have no need to
believe should not be berated or called names or have religion shoved down our throats because of our lack of faith
in a personal
deity.
I would also
believe in the various spirits of Native Americans, the Dreamtime
deities of the Australian Aboriginals, the gods of the Aztecs and Incas along with a couple of hundred
others.
In a letter to Darwin, Kingsley acknowledges that he has discarded the idea that God created immutable species at the beginning of time and that he «has gradually learnt to see that it is just as noble a conception of the
Deity to
believe that he created a few original forms capable of self - development into
other and needful forms.»
Atheists do not
believe in me but that does not mean they harbor any hatred toward Christianity, Islam, or any
other deity - based belief system.
Other than personally
believing accommodations for the disabled is a good idea, I don't know that atheists have any particular view on that subject as it has nothing to do with not
believing in a
deity.
In other words, though we should tell the lost about Christ's death and resurrection and
Deity, they do not need to
believe these truths of the guarantees eternal life to believers.
The line should have read: «
In other words, though we should tell the lost about Christ's death and resurrection and Deity, they do not need to believe these truths of the gospel in order to receive eternal life»
In other words, though we should tell the lost about Christ's death and resurrection and
Deity, they do not need to
believe these truths of the gospel
in order to receive eternal life»
in order to receive eternal life».
I certainly do not
believe in any
deity that looks over my shoulder every minute of every day and intervenes
in the affairs of man; none of the religions make sense to me
other than being a blight and scam on the supporters of the faith.
In other words, I don't believe in the God of the Bible, but even if He existed, I could never accept a deity who directly and indirectly kills childre
In other words, I don't
believe in the God of the Bible, but even if He existed, I could never accept a deity who directly and indirectly kills childre
in the God of the Bible, but even if He existed, I could never accept a
deity who directly and indirectly kills children.
While there is provision for atheist and agnostic MPs to affirm rather than invoking a
deity they don't
believe in, there is no provision to swear allegiance to an entity
other than the British monarch, which Sinn Fein MPs refuse to do.
Sorry Willlis, Anthony, Leif, Phil, Ira, Roy, George, and so many
others I've learned so much from, but I
believe you remain ranked at this time
in the range of minor
deities and demi - gods.