While I do not
believe that the
Resurrection was a historical event, your poorly phrased argument makes not only you, but atheists, agnostics, and non-Christians
in general look like fools...
primarily because we get associated with silly arguments like this.
We have spoken of the Easter message
in terms of the glorification or exaltation of the crucified Jesus, a divine act by which God was believed to have made Jesus both Lord and Messiah.37 In the New Testament the resurrection of Jesus is primarily to be understood not as an act of Jesus (he rose) but as an act of God (he was raised by God
in terms of the glorification or exaltation of the crucified Jesus, a divine act by which God was
believed to have made Jesus both Lord and Messiah.37
In the New Testament the resurrection of Jesus is primarily to be understood not as an act of Jesus (he rose) but as an act of God (he was raised by God
In the New Testament the
resurrection of Jesus is
primarily to be understood not as an act of Jesus (he rose) but as an act of God (he was raised by God).