Sentences with phrase «believe public tax»

Assemblyman Will Barclay, R - Pulaski: No «I do not believe public tax dollars should be used to fund political campaigns.

Not exact matches

The American public still believes in immigration, free trade, debt reduction, and tax reform, sometimes by large margins.

Stephen may legitimately believe that putting additional public money into the GST credit or Working Income Tax Benefit is preferable to making EI benefits more accessible.

Half the public believe their own taxes would go up under this plan and a plurality would like to see Congress scrap the current effort and start fresh in 2018.

Rather than having the poor on the public dole, thus providing a double hit, not paying taxes, and also requiring huge amounts of support, they believe in getting people back to work.

The issue of using public funds could pave the way for tax money paying for Qurans and prayer mats and stuff you'd hate worse than I would, and believe me, I am pretty skeptical about Muslims.

JK If you're talking about public schools, schools supported by everyone's tax dollars, please explain to me why my tax dollar would go to promote the belief in a god that I don't believe is real?

Supporters of the Tim Tebow laws believe homeschooled students should have the same rights as public school students, after all parents of homeschooled children pay the same amount of taxes as all the public school students» parents.

Cuomo, who has taken an increasingly arched view of Trump in his public comments, criticized the federal tax law that passed in December and said it was inconsistent to want bipartisanship in Washington when approving a tax law that the governor believes disproportionately hurts Democratic states.

Dolan is still smarting from what he believed was a failed promise last year from Cuomo to enact the education tax credit that would benefit those who donate to public, private and parochial schools.

The Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) has welcomed a recommendation in a report by the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee that the «self - employed» should be given at least «worker» employment status unless the engager of their labour can prove otherwise.1 This is a recommendation that LITRG made in written evidence to a separate inquiry.2 LITRG believes that the denial of employment rights to people working in the «gig economy» and the exploitation of other flexible workers regarding their taxes share a common cause: the workers» own lack of knowledge, their reluctance to challenge their treatment because they lack confidence or just need the work and the businesses involved apparently having little fear of action being taken against them by public bodies.

Some 94 per cent believe that the deficit in the public finances should be tackled more by cutting spending than raising taxes, while only 2 per cent disagree.

Along with the tax rate decrease, I believe that our key services remain well funded and able to serve residents, including the Sheriff's Office, Department of Public Works, Senior Services and Social Services.

E.J. McMahon, research director for Empire Center for Public Policy, said he believes the debate over the millionaires» tax has gained the most attention out of the executive budget.

«I firmly believe that New York can develop an approach to marijuana regulation that addresses public health concerns while reducing the exposure of so many people, and particularly young people of color, to interactions with the criminal justice system that have much more damaging life consequences than marijuana use,» said state Sen. Liz Krueger (D - Manhattan), who's sponsored a bill that would legalize, regulate and tax pot.

He believed Gordon Brown's doom - laden warnings — that they would mean «Tory cuts» in public services — had cost his party dearly at the past two elections, and that voters didn't believe the Tories would deliver their tax cuts anyway.

Mr Campbell's intervention taps directly into the debate at the heart of this year's conference, which divides the party into those who believe it must move away from a vote - boosting but ultimately unsustainable tax - and - spend approach towards new ways of running public services, and other grassroots supporters.

The voters believe these people take jobs that the indigenous working class would be happy to do (though the evidence for that is scarce), that they make an immediate claim on public services for which they have not made a contribution through their taxes (easier to prove) and that, in some cases, they behave in a way the indigenous population finds culturally offensive.

After all, it draws the same dividing line as the price freeze without any connotations of a 1970s style price control policy and given the windfall tax's previous successful implementation, the public would be more likely to believe it would be enforced (the ComRes poll today found that 52 % of the public do not think Labour will enact the price freeze, with 41 % believing it will).

If you lean toward the second narrative, I predict you read the Wall Street Journal, listen to conservative talk radio, watch Fox News, are pro-life and anti — gun control, believe America is a Christian nation that should not ban religious expressions in the public sphere, are against universal health care, and vote against measures to redistribute wealth and tax the rich.

Hansen, who is registered as an independent, believes carbon dioxide emissions should be taxed, but that the money should be returned to the public as a rebate, instead of going to the goverment.

I also believe that private schools participating in public scholarship or tax - credit programs should have performance contracts with authorizers.

But observers in St. Paul believe two recent developments may create a favorable climate for the concept: the U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the state's 25 - year - old system of income - tax deductions for expenses incurred by families with children in private and public schools, and the endorsement of a generalized voucher...

Only 28 percent of Americans believe that local taxes to support public schools should be increased, while over half believe that they should stay the same, and 16 percent believe that they should decrease.

GCI recommends changes to the financial oversight of charter schools that it believes will safeguard the public's investment in education while providing transparency regarding how tax dollars are being spent.

If you believe we should have fully funded public schools, sign on to the AROS Platform, which calls for a massive investment in public education and tax laws that prioritize schools over the super-weathy.

One can believe that public schools should not be uniform, but that in receipt for their funding - whether through vouchers, tax credits, or charter models - they should be properly regulated and held fully accountable.

Some people - including President - elect Donald Trump - believe that to improve U.S. education, the nation should stop spending so many tax dollars on public schools and instead invest in alternatives, including charter schools and taxpayer - funded vouchers for private and religious schools.

I believe tax dollars must remain within the transparent and democratically accountable public school system.

The more I think about it the more I believe that this is a smoke screen used by a government agency to rally public discord away from their own bureaucracies which via their HST, land transfer taxes and mortgage insurance rules — all percentages calculated on the sale price of the home by the way — do more to inflate house prices without providing any evidentiary benefit to the homeowner.

«The burden of taxes falls more heavily on single - earner families than dual - earner families,» says Jack Mintz, director of the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, who believes income splitting would be a fairer policy.

Already one potential future premier, John Cummins of the upstart BC Conservatives, is proposing to kill the carbon tax, apparently believing the public mood has changed since then - NDP leader Carole James campaigned in 2008 on a promise to «axe the tax» — and handed the BC Liberals a third straight majority.

So the Canadian public, most of whom do not understand the science anyway, have one more reason to believe that our Federal Government is wrong to do nothing about carbon taxes, CAGW, etc. etc..

No but they are duplictious & lobby the general public on behalf of clients that seek to dupe the tax payer into believing there is no harm from their product - product defence.

They believe they're entitled by being «government» to take tax payer money and jet around the world on the public's teat.

Is there anyone here who believes that Al Capone's paper work gotcha, malum prohibitum of not paying taxes should not have stood in for his ordering the St.Valentine's Day Massacre and hundreds of other murders, that substantive reasonableness would have protected the constitution and made the public better off, because their rights would be protected if they ever went to a criminal trial?

The campaign is being launched by a group of medical and public health researchers from across the nation because while we obviously think health and medical research is vital and that public good research should receive public funding, we also believe that funding should come from a universal, progressive and fair tax.

Generally, the public believes that this tax is unfair, that the city hasn't justified it, and that the city should first focus on getting its own house in order,» Bentley says.